a) Multiple : more that one
b) Light source : emiting light
C) I suppose I got a different interpretation of the challenge, that good to be different and original !
Statistics
Place: 209 out of 221 Avg (all users): 3.7695 Avg (commenters): 3.4000 Avg (participants): 3.7677 Avg (non-participants): 3.7707 Views since voting: 1006 Votes: 256 Comments: 11 Favorites: 0
Every car on the planet has two light sources. This would have been better if it had given me a clue about what was unique about your car. Is it the location? Or the dust/fog. Might have been better to take the lights out of the photo and just caught the fog. The multiple light sources would still have been obvious.
Techniquely, everything is a bit out of focus and the lights are blown out. Balance of dark at the top and light at the botttom feels overweighted.
The fog gives the image some interest but:
a) the top 40% of the frame adds no value at all.
b) Even with the top cropped out, there;s not much to hold my attention.
The "printing" does have great whites and deep blacks - a good thing for B&W images.
I don't know if this was a snapshot or what, but this sorta has the horror movie creepiness to it...very good, if that was what you were going for you should have thought of a better title...well you should have thought of a better titled anyways. Like the pic though
The idea is good; the title might need some development... i like how the ehadlights illuminate the dirt in front - pretty good effect that. however, might i suggest that you position the camera on a more stable surface and use the timer to take a picture? i'm guessing the shot was hand-held, which inevitably leads to minor levels of shake and fuzziness. DPC is a pedantic bunch who always harp on about focus... the silver colour of the car suits the monochrome appearance well... incidentally, my uncle just got a c-class - they're very nice. if it were sharper, 8. as it is, i awarded 5.