Author | Thread |
|
07/15/2008 09:28:13 AM |
ya see, mine wasnt as noticeable as yours |
|
|
07/10/2008 04:05:28 PM |
well i think part of the reason yours turned out better was because my apature was way wider, i was on like 3.2 i think. so if i had more DOF than the beads would have shown up better
ill put mine up soon
Message edited by author 2008-07-10 16:08:42. |
|
|
07/10/2008 03:02:17 PM |
Originally posted by davisssrh: Fetor: this image is Heavily processed. I'm pretty sure yours was better. I definitely want to see your version.
pidge: The setup was:
- a light 45° camera left with a CTO gel and a grid pointed at her face
- a light 45° camera right with a red gel
- a hat with strings of beads hanging down from it was placed just in front of the lense |
Sweet. thanks for the info |
|
|
07/10/2008 01:56:55 PM |
Fetor: this image is Heavily processed. I'm pretty sure yours was better. I definitely want to see your version.
pidge: The setup was:
- a light 45° camera left with a CTO gel and a grid pointed at her face
- a light 45° camera right with a red gel
- a hat with strings of beads hanging down from it was placed just in front of the lense
|
|
|
07/10/2008 10:46:01 AM |
Nice job. I watched you guys do this and never got a chance to try it. Very cool. |
|
|
07/10/2008 10:32:02 AM |
Okay, this one has a night club effect. |
|
|
07/10/2008 10:31:45 AM |
yes this turned out awesome, better than mine i might add. great job |
|
|
07/10/2008 10:29:14 AM |
Oh very cool lighting effect! I missed the set-up. Was there a honeycomb or did you shoot through something? |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/06/2025 06:44:07 PM EDT.