| Author | Thread | 
		
			|  | 05/26/2004 10:17:00 PM | 
		| | the picture was taken using an option on the camera, allowing you to take 2 seperate shots and the camera puts them together | 
 | 
| Comments Made During the Challenge  | 
		
			|  | 11/30/2003 11:54:16 AM | 
		| | What surprises you about this?  Cookies are snarfed all the time if you leave them out on  a paper towel.  Anyway, the paper towel doesn make a good backdrop here.  And I am afraid I personally don't think this is the essense of what was asked for in surprise.  I am curious though how you did this within the rules!  You got pretty good shadow detail here. | 
 | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			|  | 11/29/2003 11:40:37 PM | 
		| | In Camera effect? ok...I give up how did you do it:) | 
 | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			|  | 11/28/2003 09:40:31 PM | 
		| | What a cute idea!  Turn your head for a second and WHAM, part of one is missing or in my house, the whole pile would be gone, LOL! 
 I like this idea but the cookies would have looked better on a plate instead of the paper towel or even a plain napkin, no distracting patterns.  The light is also a bit harsh, though well distributed on both sides, I'm betting a split screen shot, my Olympus can do that also, it's a fun feature to use sometimes.  A 6
 | 
 | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			|  | 11/27/2003 09:28:13 PM | 
		| | This happens to me all the time. What's going on? | 
 | 
		
			|  | 11/27/2003 01:06:42 PM | 
		| | How is this supposed to convey the feeling of surprise? 3 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 11/26/2003 07:03:07 PM | 
		| | dispite being validated, it looks to much like a photochop effect. even if it was done on the camera. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 11/26/2003 06:57:36 PM | 
		| | A few questions to explain the low vote i'm giving: did you think about what to use for the background, and did you think about removing the crumbs? Did you think about using the on-board flash or using a desk-light or something less harsh? did you think about making the intial composition simpler, so that the difference might be more immediately obvious? | 
 | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			|  | 11/26/2003 03:51:44 PM | 
		| | The biggest surprise about this photo will be in finding out how you did this in a DPC legal way since it has been validated. Cute concept but adding a glass of milk could have taken it one step further. | 
 | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			|  | 11/26/2003 07:41:59 AM | 
		| | Great shot...anxious to see how you did this one. | 
 | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			|  | 11/26/2003 01:25:33 AM | 
		| | This looks like two photos joined together. its a bit washed out good idea though | 
 | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			|  | 11/25/2003 10:14:06 AM | 
		| | hmmm....  how did you do this? Assuming it's legal is it two pictures you've printed side by side? | 
 | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			|  | 11/24/2003 06:15:01 PM | 
		| | cookie monster?  The light is too bright, and I wish there was better focus.  I'd be upset if my cookies got eaten (not by me...) but I'd like to see the look on the persons face. | 
 | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 10/31/2025 12:25:22 PM EDT.