| Author | Thread |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
02/07/2006 08:11:35 PM |
| Too small!!! I'm sure that's not the first time you'll hear that. Cute dogs. |
|
|
|
02/07/2006 05:22:39 PM |
| Photo is too small, looks more like a snapshot than a well thought out photo |
|
|
|
02/07/2006 11:39:49 AM |
| Was that taken with a webcam? |
|
|
|
02/06/2006 05:02:28 PM |
| omg this is so bad it's good ya know??? such a funny candid..have to give it an 8 |
|
|
|
02/06/2006 12:39:02 PM |
| Too small, make sure when you upload you set the size at 640 width so you don't get this comment anymore. |
|
|
|
02/05/2006 11:28:15 PM |
| Image is to small to see details. |
|
|
|
02/05/2006 09:51:36 AM |
| This does not say romance to me. As a photo, this looks too much like a snapshot. Try to include all of the dog's face. Also, there is a tutorial on how to resize images, it is easier to see a larger image. |
|
|
|
02/05/2006 04:28:49 AM |
| Great grin on the bigger dog. |
|
|
|
02/04/2006 05:11:06 PM |
| cute, but shadowy and inconsistent coloring. |
|
|
|
02/03/2006 08:11:12 PM |
| It looks like you might have a ouple of cute pups there, but the ize of the image makes it very diffiult to rate properly. I can say that the refection in the eyes is a bit disappointing. |
|
|
|
02/03/2006 10:51:10 AM |
|
|
|
02/03/2006 01:13:45 AM |
| This is a very small snapshot. I could conceivably read affection, companionship, or possibly even love into the image, but definitely not romance. |
|
|
|
02/02/2006 05:19:33 PM |
| Too small shot, sorry. And the way the small dog was flashed on the eye... Don't use direct flash for animal photos, it hurts their eyes. |
|
|
|
02/02/2006 01:12:51 AM |
dark upper half of photo, dog red-eye, bright reflection from on-board flash on the leather - very small size compared with the 640 pixel allowed - make this a snapshot in my book.
Suggestions:
Drape a sheet over the couch
wait for daylight and open the curtains to let nice diffuse light in
shoot from another 18 inches to 3 feet up
Hope you find this helpful, as was intended. |
|
|
|
02/02/2006 12:52:52 AM |
| this shot really could have benefited from being a larger size. |
|
|
|
02/01/2006 07:23:54 PM |
| Hahaha, Does the little one really have blue eyes? |
|
|
|
02/01/2006 06:59:34 PM |
| I'm sorry but this is horrible. It was sized incorrectly, OOF, and framed poorly. 1 |
|
|
|
02/01/2006 03:58:01 PM |
| Size really does matter on dpc. You cannot expect voters to be able to jusge the merits of a photo they can barely see. Try for 640pxl at the longest dimension next time. |
|
|
|
02/01/2006 02:23:32 PM |
|
|
|
02/01/2006 02:12:28 PM |
| Seem to be a cute couple of dogs, but image is too small to see much, please see the tutorial "Using Photoshop to Prepare Photos for DPC Challenges." More depth-of-field is needed to get Bijou in focus, and blanket is distracting. |
|
|
|
02/01/2006 08:39:50 AM |
|
|
|
02/01/2006 06:29:10 AM |
| The image could be bigger, and better lighting could have been used in place of the flash. |
|
|
|
02/01/2006 03:41:25 AM |
| To small to see properly, side of dogs face cut off. Looks like a dog snapshot. |
|
|
|
02/01/2006 03:40:34 AM |
| This is difficult to judge due to the small image. Pity the dog on the left has been cut off a bit. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/25/2024 01:50:12 AM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
