| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/25/2005 09:11:56 AM |
Damn. I did not expect to see this all the way back here...I gave you a 7, and I loved this because:
The architect is both man and god, and your photo is largely landscape with the very smallest house in the corner, and it spoke to me of a kind of insignificance, of a little house (oh, wow) as compared to this giant beautiful sky...it was very fitting. I love photos that can speak volumes to me. I thought maybe you could use this for your own purposes, maybe retitle it "The Architects" :)
I am by no means religious, but I do see the obviousness of man vs nature, and I think you really captured the, uh, "size difference" here. Man is such a lightweight!
So anyway, I obviously got into this photo and I'm really truly surprised others didn't!
Take care,
Katy |
|
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
01/23/2005 07:50:06 PM |
| If the thing I'm looking at is indeed the house you're talking about, I can barely see it. It's an impressive shot, very dramatic, but I don't think it meets the challenge. |
|
|
|
01/22/2005 11:58:19 PM |
| Great effect with the sky and the water & I love the lighting. Your horizon looks level. B&W works really well also but if I hadn't read the title, I probably would of missed the house at first glance. In another challenge this photograph would of scored really well but I think it is a bit of a stretch to put this in to a challenge for architecture. Good on you for thinking outside the square but it would of been better for the house to be clearer to view |
|
|
|
01/22/2005 11:09:05 PM |
| A great shot. a little difficult to judge the architecture at this size though. Very little to it; a few pixels of light in the darkened horizon. The photo is VERY nice. Just a bit of a stretch of the imagination to call it architectural photography. 7 . |
|
|
|
01/22/2005 06:34:00 PM |
| where? this is an architecture challenge. might have scored higher if you titled it as God's earth and sky? No manmade architecture believable without your title. |
|
|
|
01/22/2005 07:06:44 AM |
| Great photo but the architecture I can see is mostly the nature itself. |
|
|
|
01/22/2005 12:02:34 AM |
| Nice clouds, nice lighting of clouds, and nice reflection. However, the house is less than 60 pixels in this format which is insufficient for an architectural study. A 3. |
|
|
|
01/21/2005 12:57:24 PM |
| You win the prize for the smallest piece of architecture, great sky. |
|
|
|
01/21/2005 12:48:32 PM |
| Great shot of the clouds, but I would've like to have seen the house more of the focus point of the photo. |
|
|
|
01/21/2005 07:11:46 AM |
| This is a beautiful image, but too much of a stretch for the challenge. |
|
|
|
01/20/2005 09:18:25 PM |
| Naaah. You could just as well have said it was Julie Andrews on the horizon & entered it in Movie Titles as "My Fair Lady". Sorry. 4. |
|
|
|
01/20/2005 10:54:06 AM |
| If ya gotta tell me it didn't do it on its own. Sorry this time. |
|
|
|
01/19/2005 07:27:09 AM |
| Beautiful shot, but dose not fit the challenge. |
|
|
|
01/19/2005 01:13:34 AM |
| Um... interesting twist on the theme! I actually giggled when I saw this because it's so vastly different from the others in this challenge. I'm afraid it might be a bit *too* free an interpretation of the challenge... |
|
|
|
01/17/2005 06:37:36 PM |
| This is a great sky picture, but I wouldn't count it as architecture shown at this size. Maybe a large print would give a different impression. |
|
|
|
01/17/2005 06:12:00 PM |
| This is a great image, though I can hardly spot the house?! |
|
|
|
01/17/2005 03:29:01 PM |
| where's waldo was last week. Great shot but it dosen't suit the challenge. i hope you detailed how you did the conversion to B&W, it's lovely |
|
|
|
01/17/2005 01:54:59 PM |
| Dramatic sky, nice contrast - but outside the envelope on architecture in my opinion. |
|
|
|
01/17/2005 01:19:52 PM |
| Nice horizon, but the house seems to small to work for this challenge. |
|
|
|
01/17/2005 12:58:34 PM |
| this is not a waldo-house challenge :) Otherwise, a nice photo |
|
|
|
01/17/2005 12:40:10 AM |
| qualifys more a s a landscape. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/25/2024 11:58:32 AM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
