DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Rant >> Juice still on the loose
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 9 of 9, (reverse)
AuthorThread
06/13/2004 02:25:38 AM · #1
Ten years ago today O.J. was chipping golf balls in his front yard. Man, I really thought they'd be tapping a vain at San Quentin by now.
06/13/2004 06:17:47 AM · #2
I guess its like with any other trial the way the prosecuters do, the innocent go to jail and the guilty are free.....somethings I never understand and hope I am never put in the situation like some have....
I have been hearing and watching about a lot of people who have been accused with rape or murder and after losing 5 or 10 years are proving innocent....they throw out all the real evidence for some reason!

Message edited by author 2004-06-13 06:18:23.
06/13/2004 09:50:16 AM · #3
I guess with his busy social calendar and all, ten years hasn't been enough time to find "the real killers." ;o)
06/13/2004 10:04:22 AM · #4
Wonder if he owns any gloves in Florida?
06/13/2004 10:44:34 AM · #5
I don't know about gloves, but soon after his trial, photos came out that showed he sure owned Bruno magli shoes in California.
06/13/2004 03:44:20 PM · #6
It's important to remember that he was not proven 'innocent', just 'not guilty' which is not the same thing. I guess the defense created enough doubt in the minds of the jurors, that they did not see fit to sentence him as 'guilty'.

Now have any of you seen 'Runaway Jury'? Fun movie!
06/13/2004 04:31:03 PM · #7
Originally posted by gingerbaker:

I don't know about gloves, but soon after his trial, photos came out that showed he sure owned Bruno magli shoes in California.


Even before the trial those photos were around.
06/13/2004 04:32:16 PM · #8
Originally posted by thelsel:

Ten years ago today O.J. was chipping golf balls in his front yard. Man, I really thought they'd be tapping a vain at San Quentin by now.


LOL, I've never heard this: "Tapping a vien at San Quentin by now."

OJ got off because his lawyers played the race card and the jury was carefully selected as people who would be sympathetic to that. He litteraly got away with murder and the jury is blame.

There was DNA evidence showing that OJ's blood was all over the crime scene. DNA evidence. What else did the jury need? I believe if OJ admitted he did in front of that jury, they would have still aquited him.
06/13/2004 04:34:01 PM · #9
the prosecution should have had someone with same large hands put on the gloves----they blew the case on most every point
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 08/29/2025 06:01:17 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/29/2025 06:01:17 AM EDT.