| Author | Thread |
|
|
12/25/2009 11:09:46 PM · #1 |
Is there an alternative to the Nikon ML-3 for the D300s? I found these two that are similar from an older thread, but they don't appear to have the motion sensor capabilities. Are there alternatives that have the motion sensor?
Cactus
JJC... or whatever |
|
|
|
12/25/2009 11:32:59 PM · #2 |
| Are you looking for a cheaper alternative or just something different? I wanted to get one with motion sensor when I purchased my MC-36 Remote a couple of years ago. But at the time I couldn't justify the price. |
|
|
|
12/25/2009 11:59:33 PM · #3 |
Originally posted by Bugzeye: Are you looking for a cheaper alternative or just something different? I wanted to get one with motion sensor when I purchased my MC-36 Remote a couple of years ago. But at the time I couldn't justify the price. |
The $200+ price tag is making me cringe. Definitely looking for something cheaper, but at the same time hoping for the same functionality. I'm a dreamer, what can I say... |
|
|
|
12/26/2009 12:30:03 AM · #4 |
You can build your own photogates pretty cheap with some electronics knowledge and planning. DIY Photogate. Photogate FAQ. You can also build a soundgate too if you want. I haven't personally built one, but I remember seeing somebody on DPC that used these, and I read up about them, but decided I didn't have enough of a need for it to dedicate the time.
Here are some online success examples
Wireless triggering
Wireless trigger with delay and flash
Example for high speed photography
Message edited by author 2009-12-26 00:37:06. |
|
|
|
12/26/2009 02:01:44 AM · #5 |
Intriguing, but the last time I built anything electric was in 3rd grade when I lit up a light bulb. Repair I do... build circuitry and plug it into my new camera? I don't trust myself. At least not without giving myself some schooling, which I don't have time for at this point. I can't learn everything even though I really want to, heh. I'm willing to fork over a little extra to have something already prebuilt by someone that knows exactly what they're doing.
It's good info for someone else if they stumble across this thread though, so thanks! |
|
|
|
12/26/2009 02:49:05 AM · #6 |
Originally posted by aliqui:
Intriguing, but the last time I built anything electric was in 3rd grade when I lit up a light bulb. Repair I do... build circuitry and plug it into my new camera? I don't trust myself. At least not without giving myself some schooling, which I don't have time for at this point. I can't learn everything even though I really want to, heh. I'm willing to fork over a little extra to have something already prebuilt by someone that knows exactly what they're doing.
It's good info for someone else if they stumble across this thread though, so thanks! |
Ha. yeah, I sorta figured that might be the case. I've thought about building a wireless trigger using my Cactus triggers and a 10pin cord but haven't done it yet... due to time constraints and worry about damages, so I know where you're coming from (though I may still build one if I get bored at some point down the road). It's nice to know what all your options are though, and I know how pricey those Nikon releases are.
ETA: I hadn't gone to your Cactus link earlier... didn't know they were making their own one now (you can make one for less). Buuuut... if you were to get one of those Cactus triggers and connect the photogate up to it like in the link I put up, you wouldn't be in danger of anything but frying a piece of hong kong electronics since the worse it could do is send out a radio signal or short the transmitter (which isn't connected to the camera). Just figured I'd point that out. Good luck with your search. Out of curiosity, what are you planning to take photos of that requires motion triggering?
Message edited by author 2009-12-26 02:53:54. |
|
|
|
12/26/2009 08:47:45 AM · #7 |
| I use the Nikon ML-3 and it works well. My wish would be for it to use RF rather than infrared, that way the range would be better and the potential for non-line-of-sight would improve too. So, unless you can find a model that is RF based, I would stay with the Nikon model, albeit a tad pricey. |
|
|
|
12/26/2009 02:18:17 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by spiritualspatula:
ETA: I hadn't gone to your Cactus link earlier... didn't know they were making their own one now (you can make one for less). Buuuut... if you were to get one of those Cactus triggers and connect the photogate up to it like in the link I put up, you wouldn't be in danger of anything but frying a piece of hong kong electronics since the worse it could do is send out a radio signal or short the transmitter (which isn't connected to the camera). Just figured I'd point that out. Good luck with your search. Out of curiosity, what are you planning to take photos of that requires motion triggering? |
Then if I were quick enough I could get a shot of the little curl of smoke!
I'm not entirely sure what I'd be using the motion triggering for to be honest. At this point it's nothing specific, but I've read people using it for all kinds of wildlife. I tend to go with the mindset of, "If I don't get it, I know I'll really want it at some point". Other than a good early sale price on my camera, that's how I came up with getting the D300s vs the D300. I didn't want video, but knew there would be a point where I'd kick myself for not getting it.
I'm leaving myself room to grow basically. Getting all the features for under $200+ is clearly the goal, but if I can't do that and get similar quality I'm going ML-3 and hoping for a sale. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 12/24/2025 07:03:11 PM EST.