| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/25/2009 09:48:02 PM · #101 |
Originally posted by david_c:
Excuse me, but I just went through 4 pages of this, and I haven't seen a nude shot yet. What's with the false alerts?!?
Get with the program, people. |
Just for you, David!!! :D
Now, wouldn't you want a screen for this one?! ;-P
ETA: Just be glad it doesn't enlarge!!!
Message edited by author 2009-01-25 21:50:06. |
|
|
|
01/25/2009 09:49:33 PM · #102 |
Originally posted by PhotoInterest:
Originally posted by david_c:
Excuse me, but I just went through 4 pages of this, and I haven't seen a nude shot yet. What's with the false alerts?!?
Get with the program, people. |
Just for you, David!!! :D
Now, wouldn't you want a screen for this one?! ;-P |
Oh sure, tease us and make it too small :P |
|
|
|
01/25/2009 09:55:34 PM · #103 |
| Hey, it was cold out! Of course it would be small! |
|
|
|
01/25/2009 09:57:02 PM · #104 |
Originally posted by BeeCee:
Hey, it was cold out! Of course it would be small! |
hahahaha. Well, at least now I can show the 4 year old what kind of man NOT to marry :P |
|
|
|
01/26/2009 03:55:56 AM · #105 |
WOW!!!
Didn't think I'd start off this big a discussion.
For the record its just a work filter I'd like. Otherwise nudity is something I encourage.
Get 'em off! |
|
|
|
01/26/2009 09:37:05 AM · #106 |
Originally posted by LiamD2005:
WOW!!!
Didn't think I'd start off this big a discussion.
For the record its just a work filter I'd like. Otherwise nudity is something I encourage.
Get 'em off! |
Best work filter available: Don't access the site at work. ;o) |
|
|
|
01/26/2009 11:00:10 AM · #107 |
Originally posted by PhotoInterest:
ETA: Just be glad it doesn't enlarge!!! |
Your glad that it doesn't enlarge, yet you clicked it to try and enlarge it? Perhaps the site could have a test to eliminate those that can't protect themselves.
|
|
|
|
01/26/2009 11:14:26 AM · #108 |
Originally posted by PhotoInterest:
|
Thats probably going to hurt someones property values. |
|
|
|
01/26/2009 11:34:33 AM · #109 |
Originally posted by BeeCee:
Originally posted by ThingFish:
I have come across very many full nude shots depicting both male and female genitalia on this site but in the rules it states
Quote" You may not submit a photograph depicting male or female genitalia, or acts of sex deemed inappropriate by a majority of the Site Council" Unquote
So why are these self imposed rules not enforced then? |
If you're right (obviously I've somehow missed those) then you should send SC a ticket telling them specific picture #s. They don't police every photo put on the site, but only know if someone tells them. |
Personally I am not offended at all by nudes but it just struck me that the rules say one thing and what actually happens is another thing. I typed "nudes" in the forum search window and here's what I found. Have a look. There are quite a number of fully nude shots here displaying genitalia.
//www.dpchallenge.com/photo_search.php?IMAGE_SEARCH_ID=701329 |
|
|
|
01/26/2009 11:41:45 AM · #110 |
Originally posted by ThingFish:
it just struck me that the rules say one thing and what actually happens is another thing. I typed "nudes" in the forum search window and.... There are quite a number of fully nude shots here displaying genitalia. |
Editing rules do not apply to portfolio images. Those are limited only by the ToS, which restricts explicitly sexual photos (outright porn). |
|
|
|
01/26/2009 11:54:51 AM · #111 |
Originally posted by scalvert:
Originally posted by ThingFish:
it just struck me that the rules say one thing and what actually happens is another thing. I typed "nudes" in the forum search window and.... There are quite a number of fully nude shots here displaying genitalia. |
Editing rules do not apply to portfolio images. Those are limited only by the ToS, which restricts explicitly sexual photos (outright porn). |
aha..thanks..that explains it then.
|
|
|
|
01/26/2009 02:19:47 PM · #112 |
Originally posted by vxpra:
Originally posted by PhotoInterest:
|
Thats probably going to hurt someones property values. |
ROFLMAO!!!
Can't imagine living in the same house after that one!
|
|
|
|
01/26/2009 08:16:35 PM · #113 |
Originally posted by PhotoInterest:
Originally posted by david_c:
Excuse me, but I just went through 4 pages of this, and I haven't seen a nude shot yet. What's with the false alerts?!?
Get with the program, people. |
Just for you, David!!! :D
Now, wouldn't you want a screen for this one?! ;-P
ETA: Just be glad it doesn't enlarge!!! |
GAHHH! My eyes! These goggles do nothink!!!
|
|
|
|
01/26/2009 08:23:31 PM · #114 |
You people are mean - I think he's cute and useful, too!
I bet you wouldn't complain if he came to shovel YOUR snow for you! :-p |
|
|
|
01/26/2009 08:24:54 PM · #115 |
|
|
|
01/26/2009 10:50:13 PM · #116 |
That all depends on if I am home or not. lol
Originally posted by Beetle:
I bet you wouldn't complain if he came to shovel YOUR snow for you! :-p |
|
|
|
|
01/26/2009 11:18:23 PM · #117 |
He comes to OUR HOMES?????
:-0
off I go to set up 9-1-1 on speed-dial............
my grandfather woulda kept his 12-gauge loaded, and "peppered his behind"
Message edited by author 2009-01-26 23:19:40. |
|
|
|
01/27/2009 09:28:45 PM · #118 |
Originally posted by chromeydome:
He comes to OUR HOMES?????
:-0
off I go to set up 9-1-1 on speed-dial............
my grandfather woulda kept his 12-gauge loaded, and "peppered his behind" |
Yeah, apparently, he has quite a clientel base built up.
1-800-555-NUDE
;-) |
|
|
|
01/27/2009 09:35:25 PM · #119 |
It's art
The first nudes were on cave walls. I would vote not to treat nudes differently
|
|
|
|
01/27/2009 11:29:26 PM · #120 |
Originally posted by chromeydome:
Originally posted by PhotoInterest:
Originally posted by chromeydome:
even so, any filter requires someone, usually the photographer, to check a box at some point indicating nudity is present--some would have considered the Dec Free Study winners to be nudity, some not. And if the box is not checked off, the filter would not work anyway.
|
To take it back to the orginating thread member's question...IS there a way that could be implemented that one could use to prevent nude shots from popping up?
In this case, this particular member WOULD check that box while at work. *smile* He just doesn't have one to check! :) |
sorry, I meant that EACH image with nudity, partial, implied, whatever, would have to be self-reported at the time of posting, etc., in order for a site filter to screen it. So the OP could check the box saying he does not want it to pop up--but if the images themselves are not "marked" then the filter will pass them thru. Fatal Flaw in the idea of relying on an "automatic site filter" in my opinion.
for example, when submitting at 1x , you have to check yes or no to nude content at upload. But what if you check it incorrectly? |
I soitenly agree, If ya ain't supposed to view semi-nudes at work, then don't.
Would you want yer kid to vote and view them in skool? The nudity here is equivalent to the Playboy/Penthouse magazines of the 1970's, but may not be suitabable for work viewing.
As an adult, I am not as vulnerable to the influence of things I see, whether it's nudes or violence. As a photographer, I would photograph anything we see. It's part of the world and environment we live in.
I really don't think you can instill any decision making abilities or moral values into growing youth by restrictions. Yes there are rules of the house while living here, but everything is available for discussion. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/02/2025 05:27:26 AM EDT.
