| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/01/2008 09:00:09 AM · #26 |
| Bob once the page is up , you have to refresh it. Mine didn't work then refreshed and there it all was |
|
|
|
10/01/2008 09:51:53 AM · #27 |
Originally posted by Dirt_Diver:
Originally posted by bobnospum:
The stats pages have no scores in them when I view them. Is anyone else seeing this problem? Are they just being upated? |
He is still updating them |
They's live now. |
|
|
|
10/02/2008 01:10:48 PM · #28 |
Congrats to the medalers!
|
|
|
|
10/08/2008 01:10:07 AM · #29 |
Well it's that time of week again folks here are your weekly DPCO-III Scores...
Congratulations to this weeks winning team:
Official Results can be viewed here
Curious to see how well you and your teams averages have improved?
Click here
|
|
|
|
10/08/2008 01:12:47 AM · #30 |
| So given that there is a three way tie, seems that a difference in the points given out just for showing up to the party could indeed affect rankings. Yes? |
|
|
|
10/08/2008 01:23:46 AM · #31 |
Originally posted by violinist123:
So given that there is a three way tie, seems that a difference in the points given out just for showing up to the party could indeed affect rankings. Yes? |
I think I counted on people not entering challenges, but that's ok.. Next week the tie should be gone.
|
|
|
|
10/08/2008 02:05:46 AM · #32 |
Originally posted by Dirt_Diver:
Originally posted by violinist123:
So given that there is a three way tie, seems that a difference in the points given out just for showing up to the party could indeed affect rankings. Yes? |
I think I counted on people not entering challenges, but that's ok.. Next week the tie should be gone. |
I sure hope that is not a shot at the Love Shack! ;) |
|
|
|
10/15/2008 12:38:15 AM · #33 |
Well it's that time of week again folks here are your weekly DPCO-III Scores...
Congratulations to this weeks winning team:
Team Poland
Official Results can be viewed here
Curious to see how well you and your teams averages have improved?
Click here
|
|
|
|
10/15/2008 12:50:07 AM · #34 |
|
|
|
10/16/2008 12:10:17 PM · #35 |
| Thanks, Joe! You do such a great job at this. I know it's a pain, and I appreciate it. We all do. |
|
|
|
10/16/2008 12:14:37 PM · #36 |
Originally posted by LydiaToo:
Thanks, Joe! You do such a great job at this. I know it's a pain, and I appreciate it. We all do. |
Yes! I appreciate it too, it makes the alternate scoring calculations much easier! :)
|
|
|
|
10/16/2008 12:16:51 PM · #37 |
Originally posted by Dirt_Diver:
Curious to see how well you and your teams averages have improved?
Click here |
Holy Crap!How am I going to improve on this? This doesn't help my team in this Alternate scoring Method!
Lvicari CAN-III 6.8011 72670 6.7619 7.0000 6.8171 7.4785 7.1697 7.0199 6.7550 6.3855 6.5135 6.1094 68.0105 10
That's my starting average? From the last 10 entries?
Message edited by author 2008-10-16 12:17:27. |
|
|
|
10/16/2008 12:22:37 PM · #38 |
Originally posted by LVicari:
Originally posted by Dirt_Diver:
Curious to see how well you and your teams averages have improved?
Click here |
Holy Crap!How am I going to improve on this? This doesn't help my team in this Alternate scoring Method!
Lvicari CAN-III 6.8011 72670 6.7619 7.0000 6.8171 7.4785 7.1697 7.0199 6.7550 6.3855 6.5135 6.1094 68.0105 10
That's my starting average? From the last 10 entries? |
Yes. The purpose is to base it on each user's current ability, not give them a benefit from lower scores in the past as they've improved over time.
This is where teamwork comes in. Your score this week was an improved over your average, so it helped the team. The top 5 differences are used. So just getting close helps. The first week, you scored lower, but it wasn't one of the top 5, so it didn't hurt your team. The next week, you scored way lower, so your score applied, but primarily because your team had 3 non-participants that week.
|
|
|
|
10/17/2008 10:36:13 AM · #39 |
Originally posted by LVicari:
Originally posted by Dirt_Diver:
Curious to see how well you and your teams averages have improved?
Click here |
Holy Crap!How am I going to improve on this? This doesn't help my team in this Alternate scoring Method!
Lvicari CAN-III 6.8011 72670 6.7619 7.0000 6.8171 7.4785 7.1697 7.0199 6.7550 6.3855 6.5135 6.1094 68.0105 10
That's my starting average? From the last 10 entries? |
HAHAHHAA you better pick it up...
|
|
|
|
10/22/2008 09:38:54 AM · #40 |
Well it's that time of week again folks here are your weekly DPCO-III Scores...
Congratulations to this weeks winning team:
Team Iceland
Official Results can be viewed here
Curious to see how well you and your teams averages have improved?
Click here
Message edited by author 2008-10-22 13:31:25.
|
|
|
|
10/22/2008 10:26:49 AM · #41 |
| This weeks winning team is ICELAND, not Poland |
|
|
|
10/22/2008 01:31:10 PM · #42 |
Originally posted by Structor:
This weeks winning team is ICELAND, not Poland |
Yes you are correct. Thanks
|
|
|
|
10/22/2008 01:33:30 PM · #43 |
Originally posted by Dirt_Diver:
Originally posted by Structor:
This weeks winning team is ICELAND, not Poland |
Yes you are correct. Thanks |
And thank YOU for your hardwork! |
|
|
|
10/22/2008 09:27:22 PM · #44 |
Okay everyone I'm sorry but there was a slight error in the math for the DPCO-III score card.
After some hours of looking at it and thinking what the heck is the problem I finally found out that I had some formulas that were somehow swapped around with a total of 4 teams, the teams were Canada I, Canada II, Canada, III, and Germany.
I have updated the score card and added something a little special as well..
Because Langdon on behalf of DPCO-III is giving away a free 1 year membership to the top player (the MVP) of the DPCO-III and up until now it was a little hard to figure that out. I have added a section to the card that shows the top 5 players of this season.
This will be updated along with the scores each week.
New update can be shown here
Message edited by author 2008-10-22 21:27:59.
|
|
|
|
10/29/2008 02:33:46 PM · #45 |
| I know you are busy, but any word on the latest updates? |
|
|
|
10/29/2008 03:49:45 PM · #46 |
Wow really Langdon offered a 1 year membership? that's awesome
|
|
|
|
10/29/2008 07:48:16 PM · #47 |
Originally posted by basssman7:
I know you are busy, but any word on the latest updates? |
I have been really busy today but to be honest I completely forgot about the scores. hahaha
Funny that no one really noticed. hahaha
|
|
|
|
10/29/2008 09:29:36 PM · #48 |
I noticed, been looking for the update since last night....Lol. Appreciate what your doing so didn't jump in. Since you asked are the stats updated?....Lol.
Originally posted by Dirt_Diver:
Originally posted by basssman7:
I know you are busy, but any word on the latest updates? |
I have been really busy today but to be honest I completely forgot about the scores. hahaha
Funny that no one really noticed. hahaha |
Message edited by author 2008-10-29 21:33:04.
|
|
|
|
10/30/2008 12:07:07 AM · #49 |
Thanks for getting them up.
You've got us (US Southwest) tied for first, but I believe Poland beat us, correct?
Steve
|
|
|
|
10/30/2008 06:36:39 AM · #50 |
Originally posted by socalsteve:
Thanks for getting them up.
You've got us (US Southwest) tied for first, but I believe Poland beat us, correct?
Steve |
You talking about where is says 1st Place - 16 Points?
I don't know why I have it on there twice but that is just the text I have in there. The second spot is really second place. Thanks for seeing that. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/31/2025 02:22:30 AM EDT.
