Author | Thread |
|
03/10/2004 05:03:59 PM · #1 |
Things I already learned:
1) It's lighter than my 70-200mm 2.8 IS
2) It's pretty damn sharp. MTF's aren't bad on it.
3) Gotta have a stable platform to shoot with it or cracnk your shutter speed way up.
Sample pic taken from my backyard |
|
|
03/10/2004 06:20:51 PM · #2 |
Let me know how you like it... that is on my 'potential' list at this point.
|
|
|
03/10/2004 07:18:07 PM · #3 |
Originally posted by Jason: Things I already learned:
1) It's lighter than my 70-200mm 2.8 IS
2) It's pretty damn sharp. MTF's aren't bad on it.
3) Gotta have a stable platform to shoot with it or cracnk your shutter speed way up.
Sample pic taken from my backyard |
Wow ! What kind of back yard is that?!
|
|
|
03/10/2004 07:19:39 PM · #4 |
I rent that lens for my zoo shots - I love it!! Congrats on your purchase... can't wait to see samples.
Edit: Just looked at your sample... holy sh@t... that's cool :-)
Message edited by author 2004-03-10 19:20:45. |
|
|
03/10/2004 09:06:26 PM · #5 |
A couple more... but these were taken with the 400mm + 1.4 teleconverter. All images cropped a bit, unsharp mask, NeatImage'd then brought back in PhotoShop to save to web.
Clicky #1
Clicky #1
Clicky #1
|
|
|
03/10/2004 11:33:41 PM · #6 |
I rented a 400 5.6L and I have to say that I was very impressed with the clarity, color and contrast of the images, the speed of focus and the light weight of the lens. Of course it would be nice if it were an f/4 or f/2.8, but then you're talking big $$$...although IS would be a welcome addition. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/10/2025 10:38:51 AM EDT.