DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Photography Discussion >> Avoiding Blur 'Lines'
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 11 of 11, (reverse)
AuthorThread
02/06/2004 12:51:57 AM · #1
I've recently noticed that when applying gaussian blur (or dust & scratches or median) filters, I sometimes get strange little gradation lines, as in this shot. If you look closely, you can see little squiggley lines, kind of like a topographic map.

Is there any way of avoiding these lines when applying these filters? I have noticed that they appear most often when the filter is applied somewhat drastically.
02/06/2004 01:19:05 AM · #2
I believe it's caused by the polarized filter. If I don't process much in PS the effect of the polarizer is good, but when you tweak with PS too much I sometimes see this same type of banding effect.
02/06/2004 01:30:51 AM · #3
I belive you are referring to the banding effect noticable in large areas with smooth gradations. This is most noticable with images edited in an 8 bit color mode as apposed to a 16 bit color modes which provides many more colors for smoother gradations. It is hard to avoid completely in 8 bit mode but it can be reduced somewhat by applying a slight amount of noise or grain via a filter in your editor. It's common with images on the internet which have to be 8 bits or less.

T
02/06/2004 07:03:26 AM · #4
Is it possible to switch to 16 bit to avoid it?
02/06/2004 07:08:29 AM · #5
In photoshop CS you can work in 16bit
02/06/2004 07:20:39 AM · #6
I often get this effect even in 24-bit mode... I also used a noise filter on high density but very low setting. I thought that there must be some dithering function that I just could not find, feeling stupid noising an image that I blurred to smoothen out. Is there not a better way to get rid of these lines?
02/06/2004 07:28:10 AM · #7
Originally posted by labuda:

I often get this effect even in 24-bit mode

Everyone is talking cross-purposes here, and not really using terms correctly.

Jpeg is a 24 bit image made up of 3 * 8 bit channels.

Photoshop normally edits images in 8 bits per channel. Photoshop CS also allows you to use 16 bits per channel.
02/06/2004 07:50:55 AM · #8
24 bit? Don't cameras usualy only record in 12 bit mode 16 bit is only the space that your working in as your image is 12 bits. Thus working in 24 is pointless?


02/06/2004 08:43:42 AM · #9
I had the same problem and ran my photo through Neat Image and it took those little lines away!
02/06/2004 09:10:00 AM · #10
Did you perhaps increase the brightness on this shot quite a bit from the as-shot file? The bands are present to a greater degree than I am used to seeing, even working in 8-bit per channel mode.
If this is the case, working in 16-bit (per channel) mode is not going to help. The bands are a limitation of the original file. If you did not increase the brightness significantly in software, then I can't say why you are seeing such distinct bands.
Working is 16-bits per channel can help you to avoid introducing this effect, however it can't help if it's there already.
02/06/2004 09:21:43 AM · #11
Some people (on photo.net) claim to take 8-bit images, convert them to 16-bit, then add a small gaussian blur (1%) to smooth out the histogram. I can't recommend it, but you might want to try it. You should do all additional editing in 16-bit too, although a wider color space is recommended when working with 16-bit.

Since you're only starting with 8-bits (per channel) of data, the advantages of converting to 16-bit are really not that great. Any editing that would cause banding/posterization in 8-bit are also likely to exist if you edit in 16-bit and convert to 8-bit. I really haven't done intensive research/testing in this area, but I would be very interested to hear about your experience.

Another option to to grab the BruceRGB working space and try working in that instead of sRGB. It's a more "efficient" suited for 8-bit editing on images intended for typical output devices. Finding BruceRGB can be tricky as it's not so commonly available anymore.

Finally, something you may have overlooked is a recent change to your color quality settings in your operating system (display preferences/settings). If they're set to 16-bit (or maybe even 24-bit), instead of 32-bit, you're more likely to see these problems.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 06/10/2025 02:30:06 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/10/2025 02:30:06 AM EDT.