Is it "Angel Eyes" or "Angel Eye" !!

02/05/2007 02:28:51 AM · #26

Originally posted by Blue Moon:

Wow, this guy reminds me SO MUCH of this: PHONY!!!

I agree, trying to sell us one eye for two.

02/05/2007 02:29:39 AM · #27

Once again u silly freak... i believe that was against you!

Message edited by author 2007-02-05 02:40:06.

02/05/2007 02:31:04 AM · #28

In fact ur that idiot screaming PHONY..... look how silly he is.

02/05/2007 02:31:42 AM · #29

Originally posted by rainmotorsports:

Once again ur silly freak... i believe that was against you!

hmmm ... you really read into things. wow

02/05/2007 02:36:17 AM · #30

Originally posted by rainmotorsports:

In fact ur that idiot screaming PHONY..... look how silly he is.

Name calling.. not my game. I think it reflects a certain culture.

Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED

02/05/2007 02:39:46 AM · #31

SO long as you dont say American's or white people! lol but its funyn when someone takes a joke thats at themand turns it around on what theyre laughing at.

But seriously have you heard of a mirror. This image is nothing but a mirror image?

Since when does that defy physicis or nature? dont try to play it off your the one that said it not me.

You seem to feel that a miror image cant be made with film or that it somehow defies nature and physiscs that i dont get.

Mirror imaging isnt somethign new, doesnt matter how he attaiend it call it digital art if u want but if it can be create din an analog fashion also then it kinda kills the whole concept of digital art.

Message edited by author 2007-02-05 02:41:27.

Citadel

Nikon D7500

02/05/2007 02:49:36 AM · #32

Originally posted by TIHadi:

Originally posted by rainmotorsports:
In fact ur that idiot screaming PHONY..... look how silly he is.

Name calling.. not my game. I think it reflects a certain culture.

Fine. I will call you what you are: Troll.

//www.dpchallenge.com/comment_browse.php?USER_ID=54033&TYPE=made&PP=50&ORDER=desc&HELPFUL=all

I stopped counting the phrase "DNMC" after 30. All on the same challenge. Each made within seconds of each other. I imagine a vote of one was also made.

02/05/2007 02:51:01 AM · #33

Citadel thanks for calling him a nice name... i was trying to be nice. I have a feeling im gonna ahve an SC letter in my mail box followed by a big fat ban... hopefully not.

Yeah so um troll can i take ur picture ive never actually seen one before.

02/05/2007 02:52:59 AM · #34

Originally posted by rainmotorsports:

I like your attitude; I believe "expert rules" should be used to emphasize and strengthen the meaning and the goal set for the photo, and not produce something that is not natural; like the cross-eyed-window reflection in that specific photo.
This is my opinion "as simple as it may by it is my opinion"

Olympus 40-150mm f/4.0-5.6 ED Zuiko Digital Zoom

02/05/2007 02:54:17 AM · #35

Originally posted by rainmotorsports:

Not on my account; I forgive you. LOOOOL

craigester

Olympus E-400

02/05/2007 02:56:25 AM · #36

Originally posted by Citadel:

Fine. I will call you what you are: Troll.

From the DPC site stats on Tihadi:
"Avg Vote Cast: 3.4345"

I think that name fits perfectly!

Olympus 40-150mm f/4.0-5.6 ED Zuiko Digital Zoom

02/05/2007 03:00:07 AM · #37

Originally posted by TIHadi:

Originally posted by rainmotorsports:
Citadel thanks for calling him a nice name... i was trying to be nice. I have a feeling im gonna ahve an SC letter in my mail box followed by a big fat ban... hopefully not.

Yeah so um troll can i take ur picture ive never actually seen one before.

Not on my account; I forgive you. LOOOOL

Heh i get a letetr from an SC memebr atleast twice a week. Im kinda of a um... compulsive name caller and uh..... let me seee ummmmm...... yeah... uh..... I dunno people just hate me!

sabphoto

Samsung Galaxy S8/S8+

02/05/2007 03:42:09 AM · #38

Originally posted by Citadel:

...I stopped counting the phrase "DNMC" after 30. All on the same challenge. Each made within seconds of each other. I imagine a vote of one was also made.

In my book if you comment about something while voting, (lets say "too dark") on one or two images, you could be right. BUT when you are making the same comment on dang near EVERY photo, you have to question your thinking and wonder if you have it wrong.

I have personally had to do this, as a matter of fact I am going to change some of my scores in a current challenge because I don't think I'm seeing things in the right light.

btw...where's the popcorn when you need it. ;)

goc

Apple iPhone 4

02/05/2007 05:04:38 AM · #39

okay, before this thread get closed ...

TIHadi ...

craigester

Olympus E-400

02/05/2007 05:11:07 AM · #40

Originally posted by goc:

okay, before this thread get closed ...

TIHadi ...

Amen to that brother!

yanko

Canon EOS-5D Mark II

Carl Zeiss 50mm ZE f/1.4 Planar T for Canon

02/05/2007 06:11:15 AM · #41

Originally posted by TIHadi:

The idea is that even with "expert editing" you have to produce a photo that abides by the rules of physics and nature. The reflection in the eyes is wrong.
But then, may be some of you are so defenses because you missed it. Who knows!

Huh? In the sky challenge which also ran under expert editing you faved two images and during the voting commented very positively on both saying you scored them a 10 yet both would easily fail your "physics and nature" criteria at least more so than Qart's photo. How do you explain that? These are the two photos in question:

Your comment: Great work . really good. 10

Your comment: "10 great idea and work"

Message edited by author 2007-02-05 06:12:25.

02/05/2007 06:47:24 AM · #42

Originally posted by yanko:

Originally posted by TIHadi:
The idea is that even with "expert editing" you have to produce a photo that abides by the rules of physics and nature. The reflection in the eyes is wrong.
But then, may be some of you are so defenses because you missed it. Who knows!

Huh? In the sky challenge which also ran under expert editing you faved two images and during the voting commented very positively on both saying you scored them a 10 yet both would easily fail your "physics and nature" criteria at least more so than Qart's photo. How do you explain that? These are the two photos in question:

Your comment: Great work . really good. 10

Your comment: "10 great idea and work"

Thanks for the question and the chance, as you see I do give 10's and a lots of them when I see work worthwhile.
As for the explanation it is very easy, the two photos you referred to were done and designed with expanded imagination and treatment and it was very clear the photographers did not want us to believe they were factual, on the other hand the title "Angel Eyes" meant to lead us to seeing and believing a real thing, and in my opinion that makes a great deference. To me "AE" would have been a great shot and work if only work was done on both sides of the face, or I was made aware of that fact and not find it out myself.

Thanks.

Message edited by author 2007-02-05 06:49:29.

timfythetoo

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

02/05/2007 06:52:34 AM · #43

Originally posted by TIHadi:

Your comment: "10 great idea and work"

Thanks for the question and the chance, as you see I do give 10's and a lots of them when I see work worthwhile.
As for the explanation it is very easy, the two photos you referred to were done and designed with expanded imagination and treatment and it was very clear the photographers did not want us to believe they were factual,

But this is factual. Downtown Columbus is a mini globe just like this. Oh wait - maybe not.

And you know I am beginning to agree with you on the point of Qarts Angel Eyes. Personally I think he should not only be DQed for trying to make me believe something that isn't true but he should also have his DPC membership revoked for ever and ever. Well, after the WPL is over. Then FOEREVER AND EVER!!!

Message edited by author 2007-02-05 06:53:48.

UrfaK

Canon EOS-650/T4i Rebel

02/05/2007 07:00:50 AM · #44

Completely ignoring everything said and done before..
The whole mirrored eye thing causes no response because it's been done before..Many professionals do this because symmetry in faces is considered at the ultimate beauty..maybe the photographer found more beauty in the reflected light dots...
The majority is authority and no matter how much anyone objects the picture found many admirers and it won..

Tamron SP AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di for Canon

02/05/2007 07:01:57 AM · #45

Originally posted by timfythetoo:

Originally posted by TIHadi:

Your comment: "10 great idea and work"

Thanks for the question and the chance, as you see I do give 10's and a lots of them when I see work worthwhile.
As for the explanation it is very easy, the two photos you referred to were done and designed with expanded imagination and treatment and it was very clear the photographers did not want us to believe they were factual,

But this is factual. Downtown Columbus is a mini globe just like this. Oh wait - maybe not.

And you know I am beginning to agree with you on the point of Qarts Angel Eyes. Personally I think he should not only be DQed for trying to make me believe something that isn't true but he should also have his DPC membership revoked for ever and ever. Well, after the WPL is over. Then FOEREVER AND EVER!!!

You guys are super heated. Take it easy it is a point of view.
Thanks

aimeethetoo

Canon EOS-30D

02/05/2007 07:02:17 AM · #46

WHAT???!!!! You mean this wasn't actually an angel????? You tricksy Canadian. I feel so let down...so used! I just don't know what I can believe anymore!

02/05/2007 07:05:51 AM · #47

Message edited by author 2007-02-05 07:08:27.

02/05/2007 07:07:57 AM · #48

Originally posted by UrfaTheGreat:

Photography is an art; you taste and present what you like and want to do.
It won, people like, that is great. I respect the way the look at things, and have my own point of view. I hope this is not too much for you to accept.

timfythetoo

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

02/05/2007 07:11:50 AM · #49

Originally posted by TIHadi:

You guys are super heated. Take it easy it is a point of view.
Thanks

Not heated here. I just find this incredibly entertaining. ;)