DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Hardware and Software >> consumer dslr vs. 35mm quality
Pages:  
Showing posts 26 - 31 of 31, (reverse)
AuthorThread
12/15/2006 02:06:57 PM · #26
Man, I miss the smell of Kodak D76 in the mornings :-)
12/15/2006 02:14:37 PM · #27
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:

Man, I miss the smell of Kodak D76 in the mornings :-)


Does it smell like victory?
12/15/2006 02:15:58 PM · #28
Originally posted by DrAchoo:

Originally posted by fotomann_forever:

Man, I miss the smell of Kodak D76 in the mornings :-)


Does it smell like victory?


Depends on how long I was in the darkroom and whether I turned the vents on ;-)
12/15/2006 03:21:45 PM · #29
Originally posted by Gordon:

Originally posted by guillermo21:

what about lens use in 35mm vs. dSLR's? i understand you don't get as much out of a lens with digital? is this true?


Mostly depends on what you mean. Many of the better SLRs are showing how poor the lenses are and are out-resolving the lenses.

Lower end SLRs crop out the center of the image, so tend to actually improve the effective lens quality.

Sort of--cropped sensors only use the center or "sweet spot" of the lens. But their "pixel pitch" is smaller (compare the 10MB 400D to the 1DMII or 5D) so the center of the lens has to be sharper. In other words, the circle of confusion of a given lens covers more pixels on a cropped sensor camera, assuming the number of pixels are the same on both sensors.
12/15/2006 03:39:29 PM · #30
I was using 35mm film and scanning the slides/negs to get a digital file. The bottom line for me is that straight digital for me was cleaner in the end. If film had any advantage (I suspect it has a little on stuff below the 5D - doubt it above that) it was lost in the scanning process unless you go the drum scan path (I have a GOOD film scanner, so I was not slopping them on a flatbed). I think film is far better in some areas - think fast B&W. If you are not scanning slides, then you probably still had some advantage on film - although you have a longer learning curve due to delayed feedback.
12/15/2006 04:06:08 PM · #31
Originally posted by hankk:

Originally posted by Gordon:

Originally posted by guillermo21:

what about lens use in 35mm vs. dSLR's? i understand you don't get as much out of a lens with digital? is this true?


Mostly depends on what you mean. Many of the better SLRs are showing how poor the lenses are and are out-resolving the lenses.

Lower end SLRs crop out the center of the image, so tend to actually improve the effective lens quality.

Sort of--cropped sensors only use the center or "sweet spot" of the lens. But their "pixel pitch" is smaller (compare the 10MB 400D to the 1DMII or 5D) so the center of the lens has to be sharper. In other words, the circle of confusion of a given lens covers more pixels on a cropped sensor camera, assuming the number of pixels are the same on both sensors.


Yup, but, as you mentioned, most lenses are significantly better in the center than at the edges, cropped sensors have an advantage over higher resolution, full frame sensors. Pixel pitch matters, but I don't see issues due to pixel pitch visibly in my images, but I do see how soft something like a 17-40 F4L is at the edges on a full frame sensor.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 01/05/2026 03:41:09 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 01/05/2026 03:41:09 AM EST.