| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/25/2006 09:55:28 PM · #1 |
| Okay I saw this on the Nikon site and couldn't find much info, anyone an expert? Is it worthy to ask for for X mas? and how does it measure up to the D70 and The Canon XT? thanks all you experts! |
|
|
|
11/25/2006 10:03:45 PM · #2 |
For the money, it's worth it to go the extra few $$ and get the D50.
However, the D40 should have Nikon's new noise reduction algorithms, and thus lower noise at high-ISO than the D50 presumably. (no definitive testing out yet that I know of.)
The D40 will only work with the newer type lenses that have a built in AF motor, so many third party lenses, and older Nikon lenses will not work.
The D40 only has 3 AF points.
By all accounts, if you want to be an SLR "power-user" then don't get the D40. It's a sight better than most P&S cameras though, and that's what Nikon is banking on. If you simply want better image quality and faster AF at a cheaper price thank going full-on gigantor SLR, the D40 seems to be a good little cam.
For me, something like the XTI or the D80 is minimum upgrade material at this point. You know what you're looking for better than I do though.
|
|
|
|
11/25/2006 10:36:18 PM · #3 |
| So this really isn't serious equiptment? ('cause I'm upgrading soon and I really want a good SLR that will last ) What's the best (P.S I really don't want to shell out too much $$$) |
|
|
|
11/25/2006 10:46:00 PM · #4 |
| What's your price range and expectation? |
|
|
|
11/25/2006 10:48:47 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by wavelength: The D40 will only work with the newer type lenses that have a built in AF motor, so many third party lenses, and older Nikon lenses will not work. |
As far as I can tell, it's just the older AF lenses that won't focus correctly as they depend on the cameras AF drive motor, which the D40 doesn't have.
Older manual focus lenses should work okay, shouldn't they? (If you were that way inclined!) :-)
Either way, I still think the D50 is a better option, given there's not *that* much in the price difference.
|
|
|
|
11/25/2006 10:50:17 PM · #6 |
| Well online Nikon says the D40 is new, oh well i thin I'm gonna spring for the D70. (My price range in in the 650 700 area) |
|
|
|
11/25/2006 10:52:03 PM · #7 |
| If your budget can stretch to the D80, it's the latest and best model in that price range. |
|
|
|
11/25/2006 10:57:37 PM · #8 |
Oh, the D40 *is* the newest model. But it's also the entry-level and cheapest model.
In order of release date, it's something like;
D70 (Jan 04)
D50 and D70s (Apr 05)
D200 (Nov 05)
D80 (Aug 06)
D40 (Nov 06)
In price, from cheapest to most expensive it's;
D40 -> D50 -> D70s -> D80 -> D200 |
|
|
|
11/25/2006 11:13:28 PM · #9 |
Personally, if I was not invested in lenses right now, and had the choice between the D40/50/70/80, and the RebelXT/XTi, I'd choose the Rebel XTi.
If you really only have $700 to spend, the D40 kit w/ 18-55 and a 70-300 lens will probably run you about that once they're in stock.
If you don't have SD cards, you need to build that into the price.
|
|
|
|
11/25/2006 11:18:01 PM · #10 |
Now I am not trying to start a Nikon vs. Canon war, because we all know they both make great cameras and either way you lean, you will be able to take awesome photos. That said, I keep reading how everyone keeps recommending the D50 over the D40 but no one is pointing out that the Rebel XT has been dropping in price lately and is a better camera than the D50. Seems that you can find a body-only in the mid-$500s and that would leave you with some extra cash to pick out a good lens.
Message edited by author 2006-11-25 23:23:40. |
|
|
|
11/25/2006 11:20:44 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by TJinGuy: Now I am not trying to start a Nikon vs. Canon war, because we all know they both make great cameras and either way you lean, you will be able to take awesome photos. That said, I keep reading how everyone keeps recommending the D50 over the D40 but no one is pointing out that the Rebel XT has been dropping in price lately and is a better camera than the D50. |
ah, you're right. For $600, you get the XT/18-55 now. Good call.
I'm still saving for the D200. ;-)
|
|
|
|
11/25/2006 11:21:03 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by jhonan:
Older manual focus lenses should work okay, shouldn't they? (If you were that way inclined!) :-)
|
Older lenses made since 1977 known as AI or AIs lenses will mount, but provide no metering and of course no AF. Older AF lenses (ie chipped lenses) will provide full metering, but no AF since the body lacks the drive motor. |
|
|
|
11/26/2006 11:54:50 AM · #13 |
| If I did get the D50 (which I most likley won't I'll probably go for the D70s or strech for the D80) does it lack alot of features? I recently played with a friend's Nikon D200, how does it compare to that? |
|
|
|
11/26/2006 12:05:07 PM · #14 |
Have you ever driven a 1970's Chevy Vega, then parked it and hopped behind the wheel of a 2006 Caddy? I reckon that would be a close comparison.
I would suggest the d-80 or d-200 if you want some bling for your ching.
Originally posted by panther2232: If I did get the D50 (which I most likley won't I'll probably go for the D70s or strech for the D80) does it lack alot of features? I recently played with a friend's Nikon D200, how does it compare to that? |
Message edited by author 2006-11-26 16:43:23. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 01/07/2026 03:34:34 PM EST.