DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> General Discussion >> "taking pictures" = see the back seat of a cop car
Pages:  
Showing posts 101 - 110 of 110, (reverse)
AuthorThread
07/12/2006 11:02:55 PM · #101
Mike these should help you understand why you would encounter a very difficult and uphill battle. They are case cites that have long guided the courts in regards to search and seizure relating to vehicles.

UNITED STATES v. ROSS, 456 U.S. 798 (1982)
and if you have the time for further research you might read one of the cases the decision was based upon. CARROLL v. U.S., 267 U.S. 132 (1925)
07/12/2006 11:26:11 PM · #102
bah, second ammendment, I'm still waiting for the ammendment "Right to bare chests" ;-)
07/12/2006 11:44:47 PM · #103
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:

bah, second ammendment, I'm still waiting for the ammendment "Right to bare chests" ;-)


I would guess most dpc'rs are waiting for the "Right to Bear Music"
07/12/2006 11:47:02 PM · #104
... Isn't that the rights to bare harems :O)
07/13/2006 10:30:22 AM · #105
Originally posted by mo5988:

...he could have just cited the patriot act and carted you off...
In the story, the cop doesn't ever seem to challenge anyone's RIGHT to make pictures -- he just a priori decided that Mike was somehow an unindicted felon guilty of something, that he had almost no rights -- but the cop really doesn't seem to have cared about the specific right to photograph.

Either way, the PATRIOT Act contains no actual provisions against photography and any officer that actually brought you in for violating the PATRIOT act (or who actually brought you in for anything at all) would have to deal with paperwork. This cop, from what we're hearing here, sounds like he enjoys working very much off of the books, so to speak.

Anyone who tells you you can't photograph anything because of the PATRIOT act is lying, mis-informed, or both.

KB
PhotoPermit.Org
07/13/2006 10:38:08 AM · #106
Originally posted by garrywhite2:

Originally posted by fotomann_forever:

bah, second ammendment, I'm still waiting for the ammendment "Right to bare chests" ;-)


I would guess most dpc'rs are waiting for the "Right to Bear Music"


Oddly enough, I have decided to put the rights to "Bear_Music" up for bids. This is your chance to own a piece of me :-) The line starts over there >>>>, bids in increments of 500 dollars please...

R.
07/13/2006 11:29:53 AM · #107


She wasn̢۪t in a dark alley late at night offering illicit services of any kind she was there to take pictures of the seedy side of life :D Look on the bright side at least it was a cop you ran into and not the seedy side!
07/13/2006 11:37:19 AM · #108
Originally posted by bjorke:

Originally posted by mo5988:

...he could have just cited the patriot act and carted you off...
In the story, the cop doesn't ever seem to challenge anyone's RIGHT to make pictures


Considering that this scenario seemingly occured on what seems to be "Private" property, the rights of the photographer in this instance may or may not be as secure as they would have been had the incident transpired on public lands.

Originally posted by bjorke:

... This cop, from what we're hearing here, sounds like he enjoys working very much off of the books, so to speak.


I find it almost bemusing that people are quick to ascribe motive to individuals in authority such as police officers by using the very same mechanism they so vehemently oppose. You accuse this officer of making assumptions... then make use of inference and speculation to support your argument. We can't have it both ways...

Ray

07/13/2006 12:01:56 PM · #109
Originally posted by overclover:



She wasn̢۪t in a dark alley late at night offering illicit services of any kind she was there to take pictures of the seedy side of life :D Look on the bright side at least it was a cop you ran into and not the seedy side!


Hey, how'd you get CLOTHES for your woody!? Mine keep getting arrested for indecent exposure... :-P
07/14/2006 12:38:12 AM · #110
Quite so Odyssey!

I think it might be time for someone to start a thread on clothing for woodies and woodettes...

I've been disturbing all the local toy stores by staring at the Barbies and Kens trying to do measurements...

Found a great plastic woody the other day, but they were sold without heads!
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 08/17/2025 11:13:36 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/17/2025 11:13:36 AM EDT.