| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/05/2006 03:01:00 PM · #26 |
Votes: 48
Views: 66
Avg Vote: 4.5000
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
No comments again, what a suprise! Haha. Wish I had a higher score, because I think my picture is really neat, but I think its low becuase people are thinking it doesn't fit the challenge enough... oh well. Still hoping for some more comments! |
|
|
|
07/05/2006 03:09:38 PM · #27 |
Originally posted by albc28:
I have a comment that asks a question about my photo...should I answer the question now or wait until after voting?? |
wait
|
|
|
|
07/05/2006 04:09:39 PM · #28 |
LOL, I'm starting to regret submitting a photo to this competition. This is one of my worst ever showings so far. Pity, because I quite liked the photo I submitted. Oh well, what can you do, eh? :D
Votes: 58
Views: 74
Avg Vote: 4.9138
Comments: 1
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0 |
|
|
|
07/05/2006 04:20:15 PM · #29 |
|
|
|
07/05/2006 04:26:13 PM · #30 |
Originally posted by karmabreeze:
Currently at 5.92. :D |
Go Becky Go!!!!
|
|
|
|
07/05/2006 05:06:46 PM · #31 |
oh come-on ... where are all the 7's in this challenge???
|
|
|
|
07/05/2006 06:10:23 PM · #32 |
Up to 6.0704... eeeeeeeppppp.... if only this one could count for WPL...
|
|
|
|
07/05/2006 06:13:28 PM · #33 |
Originally posted by PhantomEWO:
oh come-on ... where are all the 7's in this challenge??? |
not here. I'm trying hard for a 6. If I'm lucky. |
|
|
|
07/05/2006 07:10:59 PM · #34 |
Originally posted by karmabreeze:
Up to 6.0704... eeeeeeeppppp.... if only this one could count for WPL... |
it doesn't? hmm... that's probably good, since my score sucks.
|
|
|
|
07/05/2006 07:11:51 PM · #35 |
| Oh no - I've been given a 1 and two 2's - need a "withdraw from challenge because I can't take the scores" button :) |
|
|
|
07/05/2006 08:22:51 PM · #36 |
3.8
No comments... no reason why my image sucks so friggin bad... and here I thought it was great... but, guess that proves what a craphead photographer I am I guess... well least to this crowd. )-;
|
|
|
|
07/05/2006 08:25:46 PM · #37 |
Had a horrible start that I cannot figure out for the life of me. Finally got out of the 4's and all the way up to 5.9, then slipped to my current score of 5.7973
|
|
|
|
07/05/2006 08:28:34 PM · #38 |
Originally posted by PhantomEWO:
oh come-on ... where are all the 7's in this challenge??? |
damn!
Message edited by author 2006-07-05 20:29:16. |
|
|
|
07/05/2006 08:46:07 PM · #39 |
Votes: 82
Views: 121
Avg Vote: 5.3902
Comments: 3
Favorites: 0
Been falling like a rock all day. Going from being sure I had a 6+ image when I submitted to hoping it stays above a 5.
Message edited by author 2006-07-05 22:26:54. |
|
|
|
07/05/2006 08:47:53 PM · #40 |
Originally posted by PhantomEWO:
oh come-on ... where are all the 7's in this challenge??? |
not here, but not too far
Votes: 83
Views: 113
Avg Vote: 6.8434
Comments: 3
Favorites: 0
based on these stats, one can guess that I am sitting on a pretty but not very interesting shot. Which is exactly true :)
|
|
|
|
07/06/2006 03:17:35 AM · #41 |
Originally posted by EricMGB1974:
Votes: 82
Views: 121
Avg Vote: 5.3902
Comments: 3
Favorites: 0
Been falling like a rock all day. Going from being sure I had a 6+ image when I submitted to hoping it stays above a 5. |
Votes: 102
Views: 132
Avg Vote: 5.3627
Comments: 0
Had been at 6.18 for a while, took a huge dive over night, too. Still NO comments. What's going on? |
|
|
|
07/06/2006 03:31:52 AM · #42 |
| I was going good (I had a 6) then I went downhill. For some reason my pictures seem to get alot of comments :/ |
|
|
|
07/06/2006 05:51:54 AM · #43 |
Votes: 93
Views: 103
Avg Vote: 4.9677
Comments: 0
I am rather disappointed. I was really expecting better. And I don't even have one comment to give some explanation of why it is scoring so low. :-(! |
|
|
|
07/06/2006 08:29:44 AM · #44 |
Very confused about this one. I had expected mid 5's. Not a terribly interesting shot, but technically well done (or so I thought).
Votes: 92
Views: 106
Avg Vote: 4.7717
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 07/06/06 08:25 am
|
|
|
|
07/06/2006 11:50:21 AM · #45 |
Votes: 115
Views: 169
Avg Vote: 6.4522
Comments: 7
Now all I need are some 10s to make it to my first 7+ score :D ..Night voters always bump me down, day voters are good!
|
|
|
|
07/06/2006 04:50:21 PM · #46 |
Votes: 117
Views: 133
Avg Vote: 4.6667
Comments: 1
Come on people - if it's not that good please offer a few opinions as to where I could improve - please |
|
|
|
07/06/2006 06:06:05 PM · #47 |
It could be argued that everything is in motion, because the earth is rotateing etc., and therefore nothing is stationary; and it could also be argued that by using a very small fraction of a second for our exposure time that we are able to stop even the swiftest of motion so that everything is stationary. In my voting I am using a definition of stationary similar to the second choice of those offered in dahkota's quote from a dictionary. To me, to meet the challenge a shot must depict something that does not move, ever, in relation to it's surroundings; not something that can, and normally does, move but is still at the instant the shutter snapped. To do otherwise renders the description useless, and to interpret that as the intended is too ridiculous to contemplate. Sorry if this does not fit with your thinking.
|
|
|
|
07/06/2006 06:09:41 PM · #48 |
Originally posted by coolhar:
It could be argued that everything is in motion, because the earth is rotateing etc., and therefore nothing is stationary; and it could also be argued that by using a very small fraction of a second for our exposure time that we are able to stop even the swiftest of motion so that everything is stationary. In my voting I am using a definition of stationary similar to the second choice of those offered in dahkota's quote from a dictionary. To me, to meet the challenge a shot must depict something that does not move, ever, in relation to it's surroundings; not something that can, and normally does, move but is still at the instant the shutter snapped. To do otherwise renders the description useless, and to interpret that as the intended is too ridiculous to contemplate. Sorry if this does not fit with your thinking. |
Even if I don't agree I applaud your conviction.
On another note, since my mind is always moving the world is stationary relative to me. Everything is fair game... |
|
|
|
07/06/2006 06:14:51 PM · #49 |
Originally posted by coolhar:
It could be argued that everything is in motion, because the earth is rotateing etc., and therefore nothing is stationary; and it could also be argued that by using a very small fraction of a second for our exposure time that we are able to stop even the swiftest of motion so that everything is stationary. In my voting I am using a definition of stationary similar to the second choice of those offered in dahkota's quote from a dictionary. To me, to meet the challenge a shot must depict something that does not move, ever, in relation to it's surroundings; not something that can, and normally does, move but is still at the instant the shutter snapped. To do otherwise renders the description useless, and to interpret that as the intended is too ridiculous to contemplate. Sorry if this does not fit with your thinking. |
Without arguing semantics too much, I agree with the idea that something that is clearly immovable is likely to get a higher vote than something that can move but is at rest. Argue technicalities and interpretations all you like, but complete immobility is simply a stronger visual projection of the theme than something capable of motion, regardless of its current state.
|
|
|
|
07/06/2006 06:14:59 PM · #50 |
Originally posted by Nobody:
Very confused about this one. I had expected mid 5's. Not a terribly interesting shot, but technically well done (or so I thought).
Votes: 92
Views: 106
Avg Vote: 4.7717
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 07/06/06 08:25 am |
I feel the same way. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/28/2025 07:47:05 AM EDT.
