Author | Thread |
|
06/19/2006 01:20:11 PM · #1 |
I thought the meaning of the shadow in this shot was pretty obvious, but then a few people commented that it took them some while to get it. So I wonder whether there were some people who looked at the shot briefly during voting, saw the still life, saw the shadow, but did not "decode" its second meaning.

|
|
|
06/19/2006 01:23:41 PM · #2 |
didnt vote, but really very clever.. however, it suffers from the cropping, a bit tighter would of worked better, the table the fruit is on detracts from the overall feel though.. v good idea. |
|
|
06/19/2006 01:26:48 PM · #3 |
Considering your very good score, I doubt that many people "missed" it.
I gave you a 7..... 2 of those were for the effort you made, the photo as such has a few too many problems in my opinion. |
|
|
06/19/2006 01:27:01 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by ltsimring: I thought the meaning of the shadow in this shot was pretty obvious, but then a few people commented that it took them some while to get it. So I wonder whether there were some people who looked at the shot briefly during voting, saw the still life, saw the shadow, but did not "decode" its second meaning.
|
Saw it, loved it, showed it to all my relatives while I was on vacation, who also saw it immediately and thought it ever so clever! Nice work, Lev. Then again, most of your stuff is a fair bit above shabby to begin with. Just remind me not to take you on in head to head challenges.... :-) |
|
|
06/19/2006 01:32:17 PM · #5 |
I liked it a lot, and "got it" pretty easily, though I think maybe you could have been even less subtle in your title ... I think making the literary reference more obvious might have helped, perhaps like
Le Morte d'Flora (based on Mallory's Le Morte d'Arthur) |
|
|
06/19/2006 01:32:25 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by Beetle: Considering your very good score, I doubt that many people "missed" it.
I gave you a 7..... 2 of those were for the effort you made, the photo as such has a few too many problems in my opinion. |
thanks for your honest opinion. A few people mentioned tighter cropping, however I am not sure about that. For a "deathbed" look of the shadow it has to kinda lay low, with some empty space above it, IMO. One technical problem which I do see is a pretty harsh lighting which is not good for the still life, but I could not avoid it as I needed a point source to produce sharp shadow. What other problems do you think this photo has?
|
|
|
06/19/2006 01:36:35 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by ltsimring: One technical problem which I do see is a pretty harsh lighting which is not good for the still life, but I could not avoid it as I needed a point source to produce sharp shadow. What other problems do you think this photo has? |
A diffused lighting source above the fruit and pointed away from the wall might have softened the appearance of the fruit while retaining the sharpness of the shadow. The solution to most difficult lighting problems seems to be multiple light sources ... |
|
|
06/19/2006 01:36:46 PM · #8 |
I left you a comment I love this shot
|
|
|
06/19/2006 01:44:17 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by GeneralE: Originally posted by ltsimring: One technical problem which I do see is a pretty harsh lighting which is not good for the still life, but I could not avoid it as I needed a point source to produce sharp shadow. What other problems do you think this photo has? |
A diffused lighting source above the fruit and pointed away from the wall might have softened the appearance of the fruit while retaining the sharpness of the shadow. The solution to most difficult lighting problems seems to be multiple light sources ... |
General,
I tried to do this with a softbox on a strobe (see my comments below the shot), but still the direct light was overpowering if I wanted clear shadows on the background. I guess I could tone it down a bit by filtering the projector light and then amplify the shadow in photoshop, just wasn't in the mood for a lot of tweaking...
Originally posted by GeneralE:
I liked it a lot, and "got it" pretty easily, though I think maybe you could have been even less subtle in your title ... I think making the literary reference more obvious might have helped, perhaps like
Le Morte d'Flora (based on Mallory's Le Morte d'Arthur)
|
I thought about the title, too. I could call it something like "double nature morte" to make it more transparent, but decided to leave an element of a puzzle there.
Message edited by author 2006-06-19 13:44:40.
|
|
|
06/19/2006 01:51:32 PM · #10 |
i saw it right away. i loved it. gave it a 9. very clever and well done |
|
|
06/19/2006 01:56:01 PM · #11 |
I did not see it right away but when I did - I liked it. Only gave it a 9 cos it was not obvious first time - sorry! :-)
|
|
|
06/19/2006 02:15:32 PM · #12 |
I didn't have time to vote fairly so I did not vote...However, your shot with the face in the shadow is great. I would have immediatly gave it a 7. I would have then went over all of the shots and may have moved you up to an 8.
The photo itself is worth a 5 but I would have given 7-8 on a concept that worked and NO ONE else figured out !
KS
Originally posted by ltsimring: I thought the meaning of the shadow in this shot was pretty obvious, but then a few people commented that it took them some while to get it. So I wonder whether there were some people who looked at the shot briefly during voting, saw the still life, saw the shadow, but did not "decode" its second meaning.
|
|
|
|
06/19/2006 02:19:07 PM · #13 |
I did not vote on this challenge either but as soon as I saw the thumb in this thread I saw the face shadow. Very clever!! |
|
|
06/19/2006 02:19:13 PM · #14 |
I caught the "metaphor" instantly, no problem there. Conceptually a great shot, in execution it suffers a little as others have pointed out. I did a quick tweak in PS (not a very good one) to explore an alternative, hope you don't mind. Note that I've also cropped from the left to get the profile off center..
This isn't great by any means, but I've tried to mute the harshness of the light and get some drama into the BG...
R.
|
|
|
06/19/2006 02:29:29 PM · #15 |
Bear,
i like your rendition a lot, I think it is a great idea to darken the background a bit and add vignetting to increase its "somberness". Darn, did not think about it :).
|
|
|
06/19/2006 02:31:05 PM · #16 |
Originally posted by ltsimring: What other problems do you think this photo has? |
I hope you won't get mad at me. Some of these negatives are just my personal preference. Mostly they are very minor points, and you did ask :-)
Just remember I DID you give a 7, and this is only my humble opinion:
1)The overall compostion feels a bit off balance - bottom heavy
2)The lighting is harsh. I understand the need for it, but that doesn't make it any better. Different lighting might also have helped to minimize/stop the shadows on the fruit itself (from other bits of fruit).
3)I would prefer if the shadow was further away from the fruit. Again, that might make things even more difficult, but I feel it would look better.
4)I wish I couldn't see the ends of the table that the fruit is sitting on. I'd prefer it if was continuous and out of the frame.
5)The shadow line above and below the shadowhead is an almost perfectly straight line. I would have preferred more of an illusion of a bed.
After all this criticism, I must add that I don't think I could have done it any better, and that I still really like the idea and the photo.
|
|
|
06/19/2006 02:34:55 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by Beetle: Originally posted by ltsimring: What other problems do you think this photo has? |
I hope you won't get mad at me. Some of these negatives are just my personal preference. Mostly they are very minor points, and you did ask :-)
|
Karin, why would I be mad at you?! I really appreciate you taking time to answer my call, and I cherish thoughfull comments like yours.
Lev
|
|
|
06/19/2006 02:42:32 PM · #18 |
|
|
06/19/2006 02:51:28 PM · #19 |
It's a lot better than my old shot a while back , I think more people were looking for shadows this time around. |
|
|
06/19/2006 03:08:17 PM · #20 |
I didn't vote, but when I looked at some photos after the challenge, I glanced at yours and didn't see it, until now. However, I'm sure that if I was voting, I would've looked more carefully. |
|
|
06/19/2006 08:34:45 PM · #21 |
Originally posted by caba: It's a lot better than my old shot a while back , I think more people were looking for shadows this time around. |
Your shot amazes me a lot more than mine :). It was relatively easy for me to "assemble" a face shadow from many little fruits and veggies, but to make a good face just from four fortune cookies... now, that's pretty amazing. Was it pure luck or you knew what you were doing beforehand?
I agree that the challenge theme has made my shot a lot easier to digest.
Edit: the score you got is ridiculous...
Message edited by author 2006-06-19 20:36:00.
|
|
|
06/19/2006 08:38:29 PM · #22 |
I am guessing most people 'got it.' Honestly, if your shadow wasn't done so creativly, I think the picture would have gotten a much lower score. (Because the lighting is not attractive for a still life) You got a great score and a great placement. People saw the creativity and you were rewarded :) Congrats!
|
|
|
06/19/2006 08:48:10 PM · #23 |
Originally posted by JRalston: I am guessing most people 'got it.' Honestly, if your shadow wasn't done so creativly, I think the picture would have gotten a much lower score. (Because the lighting is not attractive for a still life) You got a great score and a great placement. People saw the creativity and you were rewarded :) Congrats! |
Jennifer,
I am not complaining about my score - I am pretty happy with it... and I knew before submitting that the photo would not stand without the shadow face. Just was genuinely curious as to how obvious the shadow was, it is kind of hard to gauge once you made it. Now I know for sure that at least one person two people who voted, "missed" it (see comments after the challenge). Evidently, all 50 commenters saw it, but their mean score is 7.8 something. Does it imply that those 50+ people (30% of all voters) who gave it 5 or less, "missed" it?
Message edited by author 2006-06-19 21:04:07.
|
|
|
06/19/2006 08:58:52 PM · #24 |
Originally posted by ltsimring:
Jennifer,
I am not complaining about my score - I am pretty happy with it... and I knew before submitting that the photo would not stand without the shadow face. Just was genuinely curious as to how obvious the shadow was, it is kind of hard to gauge once you made it. I know for sure that at least one person who voted, "missed" it (see comments after the challenge). Evidently, all 50 commenters saw it, but their mean score is 7.8 something. Does it imply that those 50+ people (30% of all voters) who gave it 5 or less, "missed" it? |
Well, being that it is a shadow challenge, I think the shadow is the first thing people were looking for. For me, the shadow and the face jumped right out at me. If I were to wager a guess about the lower scores, I would say it's because of the harsh lighting. It's kinda a catch 22.........your shadow wouldnt have been as evident with softer lighting.
Just my guesses, though :)
|
|
|
06/19/2006 09:22:44 PM · #25 |
I gave you a 7 I thought it was clever but didnt winning appeal >.< Sorry
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/20/2025 03:09:00 PM EDT.