| Author | Thread |
|
|
04/25/2002 05:15:28 PM · #1 |
* This message has been edited by the author on 4/26/2002 2:40:46 AM. |
|
|
|
04/25/2002 05:41:17 PM · #2 |
| ever gotten one of those chips down the back of your shirt |
|
|
|
04/25/2002 07:36:18 PM · #3 |
Originally posted by clay:
ever gotten one of those chips down the back of your shirt
Ever had anything meaningful to post?
|
|
|
|
04/25/2002 08:04:44 PM · #4 |
|
|
|
04/25/2002 08:42:02 PM · #5 |
|
|
|
04/25/2002 09:10:47 PM · #6 |
ummmm.. the shortest fight i ever saw was a left to the body and a right to the jaw...
... and no, the man was not from Nantucket...
* This message has been edited by the author on 4/25/2002 9:11:47 PM.
|
|
|
|
04/25/2002 11:04:15 PM · #7 |
|
|
|
04/26/2002 05:55:48 AM · #8 |
heres something meaningful, punky.
your picture should have rated higher, achiral. ive been toying with the idea of setting up my camera in front of the couch at parties and slamming unsuspecting persons because of you |
|
|
|
04/26/2002 07:37:19 AM · #9 |
| oh heck yeah, but there are a lot of people that said mine was fake |
|
|
|
04/26/2002 07:42:25 AM · #10 |
| no, they said you are a 'flake' |
|
|
|
04/26/2002 08:17:26 AM · #11 |
... sigh ...
* This message has been edited by the author on 4/26/2002 8:19:45 AM. |
|
|
|
04/26/2002 08:46:18 AM · #12 |
| haha, David Ey, what a nice guy, I don't even remember talking to you... |
|
|
|
04/26/2002 08:47:31 AM · #13 |
|
|
|
04/26/2002 08:58:49 AM · #14 |
| ahh.. aspirations of delinquency. |
|
|
|
04/26/2002 09:00:39 AM · #15 |
i love how people every once in a while try to leave profound statements about people being children or delinquency, when some of the most immature people on this site are some of the older ones
not you drew
* This message has been edited by the author on 4/26/2002 9:00:59 AM. |
|
|
|
04/26/2002 09:06:11 AM · #16 |
|
|
|
04/26/2002 09:19:55 AM · #17 |
i didn't want to seem like i was ripping on drew, i have no idea how old he is though
someone should delete this thread
* This message has been edited by the author on 4/26/2002 9:20:10 AM. |
|
|
|
04/26/2002 09:58:09 AM · #18 |
I was joking really. Drew's profile says 21. To me that's a spring chicken.
I just want to know what this whole thread has to do with voting anyway. |
|
|
|
04/26/2002 10:09:55 AM · #19 |
Originally posted by shortredneck:
I was joking really. Drew's profile says 21. To me that's a spring chicken.
Spring chicken ... ooh :)
I just want to know what this whole thread has to do with voting anyway.
Nothing. Sad, no? |
|
|
|
04/26/2002 10:15:35 AM · #20 |
Yeah and kind of weird too.
(from the dried up old hen) |
|
|
|
04/26/2002 10:37:14 AM · #21 |
ey posted a legit question and it got derailed and he got disgusted and deleted his post
|
|
|
|
04/26/2002 10:53:37 AM · #22 |
To reply to your original post, David, my concern with it is that it makes the voting scheme somewhat more difficult (keeping in mind there are still people who don't understand it) as well as adds a little more time to the voting process (a process that might already be too lengthy). I was thinking a few weeks back of something like superlatives, where you could pick one from a dropdown. i.e. Most Creative, Best Challenge Interpretation, uhmmmm... I'm out of superlatives :)
Drew |
|
|
|
04/26/2002 11:03:11 AM · #23 |
...
Best use of color...
Best use of depth of field...
Best use of black and white...
Best use of perspective...
Best use of lighting...
just some thoughts...
|
|
|
|
04/26/2002 11:09:12 AM · #24 |
i think jmsetzler is right on with a few of those ideas but i could see a problem developing with a black and white or lighting award. those are more specific in the others in that what would happen if everyone decided to go for the black and white or lighting prize and each picture was essentially just a contest for a sub-category and not the actual category like transtions or whatever it may be for that week.
* This message has been edited by the author on 4/26/2002 11:09:31 AM.
* This message has been edited by the author on 4/26/2002 11:09:45 AM. |
|
|
|
04/26/2002 11:42:24 AM · #25 |
... but given that the number of submissions means that future challenges might be broken in sub-catagories anyway, this might be a good way of doing so.
* This message has been edited by the author on 4/26/2002 11:42:49 AM.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/27/2025 07:52:27 PM EDT.
