| Author | Thread |
|
|
05/01/2006 01:36:26 AM · #51 |
Originally posted by Southern Gentleman:
Originally posted by lfordhere:
Is there a way to cancel, or unsubmit, my photo? This is ridiculous... The quality of my photo is exceptional, yet my score is 5.5. It's a FREE STUDY for crying out loud, which implies to me to judge the photo based on how technically sound it is. I am really fed up with this site and the people that vote without care. I'm now thinking comments should be required. |
Do you consider a 5.5 score to be bad? Could put into words what quality of picture would deserve a 5.5? |
Yes, I would consider it bad based on how well I think the photo is; looking at the photo from the technical perspective. Yes, I am biased, but technically the photo is perfect. |
|
|
|
05/01/2006 01:37:27 AM · #52 |
Originally posted by yanko:
lfordhere, are you voting on every photo in each challenge? |
No, I don't have time to sit here and vote on every challenge, and each photo. I try to comment as much as possible, but I usually only make it to the 20% mark before quitting. |
|
|
|
05/01/2006 01:38:00 AM · #53 |
Originally posted by Rikki:
Well let's get back on track shall we?
Votes: 14
Views: 29
Avg Vote: 7.7143
Comments: 1
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 05/01/06 01:34 am |
You are disgusting. Great start! Keep this up and you won't have any friends at all. LOL!!!
|
|
|
|
05/01/2006 01:38:56 AM · #54 |
Originally posted by stdavidson:
Originally posted by Rikki:
Well let's get back on track shall we?
Votes: 14
Views: 29
Avg Vote: 7.7143
Comments: 1
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 05/01/06 01:34 am |
You are disgusting. Great start! Keep this up and you won't have any friends at all. LOL!!! |
shhhhh. that really ain't my score steve. just trying to prove a point :P |
|
|
|
05/01/2006 01:39:07 AM · #55 |
Originally posted by lfordhere:
Yes, I am biased, but technically the photo is perfect. |
I can see why your mad!
LMAO :-P |
|
|
|
05/01/2006 01:41:35 AM · #56 |
Originally posted by lfordhere:
Yes, I would consider it bad based on how well I think the photo is; looking at the photo from the technical perspective. Yes, I am biased, but technically the photo is perfect. |
But does it have cowbell? |
|
|
|
05/01/2006 01:41:46 AM · #57 |
Originally posted by thegrandwazoo:
Originally posted by lfordhere:
Yes, I am biased, but technically the photo is perfect. |
I can see why your mad!
LMAO :-P |
LOL, well, it is! |
|
|
|
05/01/2006 01:42:29 AM · #58 |
Originally posted by lfordhere:
Originally posted by Southern Gentleman:
Originally posted by lfordhere:
Is there a way to cancel, or unsubmit, my photo? This is ridiculous... The quality of my photo is exceptional, yet my score is 5.5. It's a FREE STUDY for crying out loud, which implies to me to judge the photo based on how technically sound it is. I am really fed up with this site and the people that vote without care. I'm now thinking comments should be required. |
Do you consider a 5.5 score to be bad? Could put into words what quality of picture would deserve a 5.5? |
Yes, I would consider it bad based on how well I think the photo is; looking at the photo from the technical perspective. Yes, I am biased, but technically the photo is perfect. |
Then how would you define a score of 3.6+/-? You have over a thousand votes and your vote cast is almost 2 full points lower than what you define as a BAD picture. In my opinion if you are receiving votes of 2 points higher than you give; I don't see a justification in complaining.
Just my "respectful" two cents.
|
|
|
|
05/01/2006 01:42:41 AM · #59 |
Originally posted by Rikki:
Originally posted by stdavidson:
Originally posted by Rikki:
Well let's get back on track shall we?
Votes: 14
Views: 29
Avg Vote: 7.7143
Comments: 1
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 05/01/06 01:34 am |
You are disgusting. Great start! Keep this up and you won't have any friends at all. LOL!!! |
shhhhh. that really ain't my score steve. just trying to prove a point :P |
Well, good, we don't hate you now. Not entirely, anyway. ;) :P |
|
|
|
05/01/2006 01:42:55 AM · #60 |
Votes: 14
Views: 18
Avg Vote: 5.2857
Comments: 1
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 05/01/06 01:34 am
Hmmm, seems the score debate is raising it's head again :)
My 2c... While I still have to break the 6 mark (may still get there on the photojournalism thing 5.8), I consider a 5+ a good photograph. Besides, this is just for fun. |
|
|
|
05/01/2006 01:45:37 AM · #61 |
Originally posted by sammigurl:
Originally posted by Rikki:
Originally posted by stdavidson:
Originally posted by Rikki:
Well let's get back on track shall we?
Votes: 14
Views: 29
Avg Vote: 7.7143
Comments: 1
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 05/01/06 01:34 am |
You are disgusting. Great start! Keep this up and you won't have any friends at all. LOL!!! |
shhhhh. that really ain't my score steve. just trying to prove a point :P |
Well, good, we don't hate you now. Not entirely, anyway. ;) :P |
He's just playing you. His score is probably 7.7243!
|
|
|
|
05/01/2006 01:46:40 AM · #62 |
Originally posted by Rikki:
Originally posted by stdavidson:
Originally posted by Rikki:
Well let's get back on track shall we?
Votes: 14
Views: 29
Avg Vote: 7.7143
Comments: 1
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 05/01/06 01:34 am |
You are disgusting. Great start! Keep this up and you won't have any friends at all. LOL!!! |
shhhhh. that really ain't my score steve. just trying to prove a point :P |
From you that is a VERY believable score and I'm gullible! LOL!!
|
|
|
|
05/01/2006 01:48:14 AM · #63 |
| Looks like Erick and I are competing for Brown on this one... 3.57 after 14 votes. |
|
|
|
05/01/2006 01:53:03 AM · #64 |
Originally posted by MQuinn:
Originally posted by lfordhere:
Yes, I would consider it bad based on how well I think the photo is; looking at the photo from the technical perspective. Yes, I am biased, but technically the photo is perfect. |
But does it have cowbell? |
No it has two people. |
|
|
|
05/01/2006 01:58:54 AM · #65 |
Originally posted by Rikki:
Well let's get back on track shall we?
Votes: 14
Views: 29
Avg Vote: 7.7143
Comments: 1
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 05/01/06 01:34 am |
phew.. #1, thank pete we don't compete against you in week 5.
#2, thank pete it doesn't count in the WPL anyway. hehe
#3, teach me to be this consistently good. lol
#4, oops, I didn't read ahead enough to realize you were joking.
Message edited by author 2006-05-01 01:59:41. |
|
|
|
05/01/2006 02:03:10 AM · #66 |
Originally posted by lfordhere:
Yes, I would consider it bad based on how well I think the photo is; looking at the photo from the technical perspective. Yes, I am biased, but technically the photo is perfect. |
Maybe the way in which you presented your subject matter is technically perfect but aesthetically bad ?
bazz.
|
|
|
|
05/01/2006 02:05:22 AM · #67 |
Originally posted by sir_bazz:
Originally posted by lfordhere:
Yes, I would consider it bad based on how well I think the photo is; looking at the photo from the technical perspective. Yes, I am biased, but technically the photo is perfect. |
Maybe the way in which you presented your subject matter is technically perfect but aesthetically bad ?
bazz. |
I don't know... I think it's perfect. I'm stubborn too. |
|
|
|
05/01/2006 02:07:50 AM · #68 |
| If you feel that contests average a 3.5, how could you expect people to recognize the excellence of your photos? They clearly don't know any better. |
|
|
|
05/01/2006 02:09:02 AM · #69 |
Originally posted by mk:
If you feel that contests average a 3.5, how could you expect people to recognize the excellence of your photos? They clearly don't know any better. |
Great point... I'm in the wrong place. Thanks for shining the light so I could see. |
|
|
|
05/01/2006 02:10:04 AM · #70 |
Votes: 14
Views: 19
Avg Vote: 6.0714
I'll take it.
|
|
|
|
05/01/2006 02:15:26 AM · #71 |
| Hey take it easy on this guy, he's 85 after all (check the profile). Technical excellence may include a bit of camera shake at that age...or maybe the cataract is causing a color cast...most likely it's just senility and his score really is good, he's just forgotten. |
|
|
|
05/01/2006 02:19:58 AM · #72 |
Originally posted by DrAchoo:
Hey take it easy on this guy, he's 85 after all (check the profile). Technical excellence may include a bit of camera shake at that age...or maybe the cataract is causing a color cast...most likely it's just senility and his score really is good, he's just forgotten. |
hahahaha, thanks for the laugh... something tells me you viewed my profile before I have decided to pull everything off and quit it. |
|
|
|
05/01/2006 02:24:58 AM · #73 |
Originally posted by lfordhere:
hahahaha, thanks for the laugh... something tells me you viewed my profile before I have decided to pull everything off and quit it. |
Guess your not as quick a learner as you suggested in one of your earlier posts here.
cheers,
bazz.
|
|
|
|
05/01/2006 02:27:42 AM · #74 |
Originally posted by sir_bazz:
Originally posted by lfordhere:
hahahaha, thanks for the laugh... something tells me you viewed my profile before I have decided to pull everything off and quit it. |
Guess your not as quick a learner as you suggested in one of your earlier posts here.
cheers,
bazz. |
What is this supposed to mean? Simply because I don't want to be a member of this site anymore I suddenly don't learn so quick? How can you possibly connect those dots?
|
|
|
|
05/01/2006 02:29:54 AM · #75 |
| I think he was saying he's not surprised you are doing time in the 5.5's before you rise to stellar heights... |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/01/2025 07:36:45 AM EDT.
