| Author | Thread |
|
|
03/29/2006 07:36:11 PM · #26 |
I don't share the obsession with resolution in fine (no pun intended) art photography. Have you ever tried to look at an impressionistic painting from a 1 ft distance? How does it look? I think composition, lighting, mood are much more important than pixel count.
|
|
|
|
03/29/2006 07:40:02 PM · #27 |
Originally posted by ltsimring:
I don't share the obsession with resolution in fine (no pun intended) art photography. Have you ever tried to look at an impressionistic painting from a 1 ft distance? How does it look? I think composition, lighting, mood are much more important than pixel count. |
Thats the reason Ansel used a 35mm. Who needs all that resolution...
|
|
|
|
03/29/2006 07:48:51 PM · #28 |
Originally posted by fitmpdnsthtr:
I don't know what you guys are talking about, my (now)crappy dig. rebel is good enough to print 20x30. I recently printed about seven 20x30 of SF and they look awesome. I can't even see the pixels yet. I am getting a 30D in tomorrow, can't wait to see what I can print with that, I am sure I can do 30x40. I guess only time will tell. I am sure I will be happy either way. |
Everybody has there own opinions of quality. I prefer very large prints from scanned (200mb+) film files.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/24/2025 07:01:50 AM EDT.
