| Author | Thread |
|
|
03/29/2006 06:14:48 PM · #276 |
|
|
|
03/29/2006 06:50:43 PM · #277 |
|
|
|
03/30/2006 09:56:01 AM · #278 |
woohooo keep bumping the scores!! its getting higher!
|
|
|
|
03/30/2006 10:16:08 AM · #279 |
Im at 5.95 -1.30
Did recieve a comment from the original member. |
|
|
|
03/30/2006 10:23:14 AM · #280 |
I'm really looking forward to seeing the top 10 scores in this Challenge.
|
|
|
|
03/30/2006 10:53:07 AM · #281 |
|
|
|
03/30/2006 11:18:47 AM · #282 |
| -0.7964... and happy about it. |
|
|
|
03/30/2006 01:23:17 PM · #283 |
its been going up little by little :)..can't wait to see the ribbon winners!
|
|
|
|
03/30/2006 01:29:58 PM · #284 |
-0.7351
my score skyrocketed overnight...keep going
|
|
|
|
03/30/2006 01:53:46 PM · #285 |
Deja Vu II
Votes: 192
Views: 282
Avg Vote: 4.8021
Comments: 6
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 03/30/06 01:10 pm
I remain mired in mediocrity.
Well, I tried to vote on everything but I still have 21 entries that I can't recognize the originals for! I found originals for everyone who gave a date or a challenge name or an author, but the remaining are title only, if that. Any suggestions how I can find the originals? |
|
|
|
03/30/2006 02:06:06 PM · #286 |
I voted all the images in this challenge. I expect very high scores for the top finishers. There are fantastic entrys in it. I gave more than 40% of them scores of 8 and above and no scores below 5.
Great work and a tip of the hat to all who entered!
Then, after I voted the last one I discovered that nobody did a tribute to any of my pictures. That caused a terrible dilema. I was distraught. I didn't know what to do.
So I consulted with other DNMC voters and we all agreed... If there are no tributes to any of our photographs in the challenge that clearly proved that the whole collection of pictures failed to meet the challenge. And oddly enough, that was true of every one of us.
Sorry...
So I went back and re-voted all the pictures, randomly scattering scores in the 1-5 range to prevent detection by computer voting analysis so they would not be thrown out.
That is how we DNMCers always do that.
|
|
|
|
03/30/2006 02:14:42 PM · #287 |
Originally posted by stdavidson:
So I consulted with other DNMC voters and we all agreed... If there are no tributes to any of our photographs in the challenge that clearly proved that the whole collection of pictures failed to meet the challenge. And oddly enough, that was true of every one of us.
That is how we DNMCers always do that. |
Mine IS a tribute to your Morning Coffee!!
(It's just, er, an abstract tribute) and only a TRUE artist, such as yourself, would appreciate my artistic license.
So - please hand me back that 10.
Thanks.
:-)
|
|
|
|
03/30/2006 02:34:03 PM · #288 |
Originally posted by mattmac:
Originally posted by stdavidson:
So I consulted with other DNMC voters and we all agreed... If there are no tributes to any of our photographs in the challenge that clearly proved that the whole collection of pictures failed to meet the challenge. And oddly enough, that was true of every one of us.
That is how we DNMCers always do that. |
Mine IS a tribute to your Morning Coffee!!
(It's just, er, an abstract tribute) and only a TRUE artist, such as yourself, would appreciate my artistic license.
So - please hand me back that 10.
Thanks.
:-) |
OK... you got it, but if you think I'm going to go back and changing all those other scores again your crazy!
I'll let it slide this time, but I don't want to ever catch you accusing us DNMCers of being "a TRUE artist" ever again. LOL!!!
|
|
|
|
03/30/2006 02:39:21 PM · #289 |
Originally posted by stdavidson:
I voted all the images in this challenge. I expect very high scores for the top finishers. There are fantastic entrys in it. I gave more than 40% of them scores of 8 and above and no scores below 5.
Great work and a tip of the hat to all who entered!
Then, after I voted the last one I discovered that nobody did a tribute to any of my pictures. That caused a terrible dilema. I was distraught. I didn't know what to do.
So I consulted with other DNMC voters and we all agreed... If there are no tributes to any of our photographs in the challenge that clearly proved that the whole collection of pictures failed to meet the challenge. And oddly enough, that was true of every one of us.
Sorry...
So I went back and re-voted all the pictures, randomly scattering scores in the 1-5 range to prevent detection by computer voting analysis so they would not be thrown out.
That is how we DNMCers always do that. |
Just to make absolutely sure (so nobody worries) - you are kidding, right?
|
|
|
|
03/30/2006 02:42:07 PM · #290 |
Originally posted by ursula:
Originally posted by stdavidson:
That is how we DNMCers always do that. |
Just to make absolutely sure (so nobody worries) - you are kidding, right? |
Of course I am! But not the part about how great the pictures in the challenge are.
They are Super!!
|
|
|
|
03/30/2006 02:43:26 PM · #291 |
Originally posted by stdavidson:
Originally posted by ursula:
Originally posted by stdavidson:
That is how we DNMCers always do that. |
Just to make absolutely sure (so nobody worries) - you are kidding, right? |
Of course I am! But not the part about how great the pictures in the challenge are.
They are Super!! |
:)
|
|
|
|
03/30/2006 02:54:33 PM · #292 |
Definitely agree on the quality of this week's images ...
We have some amazing photographers here.
bummer that my for-once decent score will merely be swimming under the many much higher scores :)
|
|
|
|
03/30/2006 04:21:01 PM · #293 |
Votes: 194
Views: 311
Avg Vote: 6.3351
Comments: 5
Favorites: 2
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 03/30/06 04:19 pm
Let's see, 140 entries in this challenge, most of exceptionally high quality, will a 6.3 place in the top 70?
|
|
|
|
03/30/2006 04:26:09 PM · #294 |
Originally posted by metatate:
bummer that my for-once decent score will merely be swimming under the many much higher scores :) |
I hear you. This will be my personal best if it stays in the vicinity of where it is right now.
Well, I'll have a high-score image on my profile page, shouldn't matter that it will be a 70% challenge shot.
Edit to add: 202 votes @ 6.5545, 15 comments.
Message edited by author 2006-03-30 16:27:00. |
|
|
|
03/30/2006 06:06:52 PM · #295 |
Originally posted by posthumous:
Well, I tried to vote on everything but I still have 21 entries that I can't recognize the originals for! I found originals for everyone who gave a date or a challenge name or an author, but the remaining are title only, if that. Any suggestions how I can find the originals? |
Post,
I suggest you vote on the qualitly of the image itself, not how well it copied the original. There could be aspects that are better or just different, that you may be marking down because it is not an imitaion. Just vote, and enjoy!
Message edited by author 2006-03-30 18:07:32. |
|
|
|
03/30/2006 06:16:05 PM · #296 |
Originally posted by larryslights:
Let's see, 140 entries in this challenge, most of exceptionally high quality, will a 6.3 place in the top 70? |
If the previous Deja Vu is any indication, you should be in top 50 (in that challenge 6.3 were around 35th place among 106 participants, and we have 140).
Using the same scaling, I should be in top 10 :). We'll see...
Message edited by author 2006-03-30 18:16:20.
|
|
|
|
03/30/2006 06:51:13 PM · #297 |
And using that same scaling, my 4.533 should rank around 150th place
|
|
|
|
03/30/2006 06:53:41 PM · #298 |
Votes: 189
Views: 272
Avg Vote: 5.9788
Comments: 9
|
|
|
|
03/30/2006 07:52:35 PM · #299 |
wow i feel great! i'm beating you!!! now if i could only beat rikki....
Originally posted by idnic:
Votes: 189
Views: 272
Avg Vote: 5.9788
Comments: 9 |
|
|
|
|
03/30/2006 08:12:18 PM · #300 |
well, I just finished voting on all of the images, so don't expect anymore scores from me.
sorry if I didn't vote you high enough.
|
|
