Author | Thread |
|
01/09/2006 06:59:18 AM · #1 |
Okie. I got a bit of a mistake somewhere in the translation, but anyhow, I now want to know what you people think about going with the Canon 80-200 F2.8L for around 480 dollars US.
I had asked earlier about the 70-200, but I guess I was a bit wrong.
How does it compare with the 70-200 in terms of speed and sharpness?
Anything else that needs to be known?
Thanks! I have the lens in my hot little hands and I have no camera body to test it with (although I will be borrowing a friend's camera ASAP to check it out. |
|
|
01/09/2006 07:30:50 AM · #2 |
Better change that price to 600 dollars US |
|
|
01/09/2006 08:11:23 AM · #3 |
I was about to say that's an amazing deal at 480. Still a good deal at 600...this is one of the best lenses Canon has ever made. Very sharp...focusing speed is quite good (no USM so no full time manual or quiet focus). |
|
|
01/09/2006 08:34:19 AM · #4 |
Thanks for that. I feel a lot more secure knowing that 600 dollars is still considered a good deal. I actually really liked the lens when I saw it and it's in really good shape. It also comes with a 50 dollar B+W filter on it for protection that is pretty nice.
Just felt a little overwhelmed because I haven't got a camera yet. |
|
|
01/09/2006 09:03:41 AM · #5 |
hmm this is an old lens, is it discontinued? never heard of it. Who has used it or likes if anyone?
ok answered sounds like a pretty cool lens
Message edited by author 2006-01-09 09:08:59.
|
|
|
01/09/2006 09:05:50 AM · #6 |
600 US?! Take it and don't look back
I've no regrets with mine. You may not have the extra 10mm, but I love mine. Speedwise, it's been a while since I fiddled with the 70-200, but I shoot live action, and I've never been frustrated with the performance of the lens.
According to a review I read somewhere, the optics of the 80-200 are on par with, if not a tiny bit better than the 70-200, but I can't vouch for that.
   
First and last have ahd a fair amount of post processing done to them...
Anyways, I think you should get it, and amke sure it comes with the tripod mount
|
|
|
01/09/2006 09:15:00 AM · #7 |
The Canon 80-200 f2.8 L aka "Magic Drainpipe" is one of the best Canon lenses made. As mentioned before, it has no USM, so there's no fulltime manual focus and it's not as quiet as a USM lens, but it still focuses well.
|
|
|
01/09/2006 09:44:06 AM · #8 |
Great encouragement. One website has the information reported that the sharpness is equivalent to most other lenses except the edges at 200mm f2.8.
Yes it is a discontinued lens. It is the precursor to the 70-200 F2.8L.
What encourages me most is people's evaluation of the value at this price and also the long-time users who report so well on the feel and usability.
|
|
|
01/09/2006 11:18:38 AM · #9 |
Grab it and run away smiling. I saw one on FM last week for more than than that - the edge issue will not be an issue on a less than FF sensor anyway.
I got an older 70-210 2.8 tamron for a good price. I see issues now and then that might not be an issue with a newer lens, but i can live wiht that when i get pics like this from it:
the bird, not the BG - well, it was shot with that lens too, but this is a composite)

|
|
|
01/09/2006 12:52:33 PM · #10 |
Photozone.de has reviews of both the 80-200 and 70-200. I think the lens is nice and appears comparable to the 70-200 if you can find a nice clean copy .
Good luck bidding.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/21/2025 10:30:54 PM EDT.