| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/03/2005 11:50:00 PM · #1 |
Here is what I should have entered The text would not had been there.
Here is what I entered 
Would I had scored higher with my "should have?
KS |
|
|
|
11/03/2005 11:52:13 PM · #2 |
I can only speak for myself, but in my case definitely. Looks liek the entry is a crop of the other one? Why you let the beautiful, soft, white face go so dark is a mystery to me :-)
Robt.
|
|
|
|
11/03/2005 11:54:10 PM · #3 |
This was a completly different shot...taken a few seconds later...
Why would I let the beautiful face go so dark and enter that one? Cause I'm an idiot! ;-)
Originally posted by bear_music:
I can only speak for myself, but in my case definitely. Looks liek the entry is a crop of the other one? Why you let the beautiful, soft, white face go so dark is a mystery to me :-)
Robt. |
|
|
|
|
11/03/2005 11:59:11 PM · #4 |
I am not a big fan of "light on white" photos, but your "outtake" is delightful.
Forgive me, but I must agree with your self-assessment. |
|
|
|
11/04/2005 12:01:20 AM · #5 |
I would have scored the one you didn't enter much higher. I was personally upset that the doggie was out of focus.
|
|
|
|
11/04/2005 12:02:36 AM · #6 |
I will second the comments expressed by Bear....
You fumbled the ball on this one, my friend. It is really sad that you opted for the photo you did as the other was so so much better.
Live an learn I guess.
Ray
PS Calling yourself an idiot is perhaps a bit harsh...... but then again, I don't know you that well,,,,,,,,,,hehehehehe. |
|
|
|
11/04/2005 12:14:24 AM · #7 |
Your outtake is a huge improvement.
Good luck with your next challenge.
bazz. |
|
|
|
11/04/2005 12:38:04 AM · #8 |
Yep...just as I thought...I blew it...maybe a half to 3/4 point? Oh well..My first DSLR was purchased last April... So only been doing this a short while.
I'll choose more "wisely" in the future!
KS |
|
|
|
11/04/2005 05:44:17 AM · #9 |
| from me yes. I hate to say it but it was blurred and the first wasn't. The eyes were sharp and the image was cleaner looker. I think #2 is beautiful. |
|
|
|
11/04/2005 05:50:18 AM · #10 |
| Oh why didn't you enter your out take! It's a much better photo and would of scored well! The focus in your entry is really too soft. You nailed it in the second one! |
|
|
|
11/04/2005 06:01:10 AM · #11 |
I have to agree with everyone else. The outtake is a better shot and I would have scored it higher. The one you used is out of focus on the dog's face and it looks underexposed. The other shot has nice focus and fits the challenge nicely.
Message edited by author 2005-11-04 07:31:27.
|
|
|
|
11/04/2005 06:08:16 AM · #12 |
agree with what has been said,,, the entry was out of focus where as the other shot would have scored alot higher as its a great shot.. very sharp..
beautiful dog btw.. :D
Message edited by author 2005-11-04 06:08:45. |
|
|
|
11/04/2005 07:18:28 AM · #13 |
I also would have scored the outtake a lot higher, I concur with all the comments before, one you submitted being too dark and out of focus etc. I would have scored it at least 2 or 3 points higher. Cute shot.
|
|
|
|
11/04/2005 07:24:24 AM · #14 |
Out-take is much better!
But I bet you would have gotten a comment... Eyes and Nose are Too Dark, does not meet challenge (evil laugh)
|
|
|
|
11/04/2005 07:31:56 AM · #15 |
| I second guess myself all the time! Don't fret it. Just know that you have those great photos for yourself, if not for a DPC challenge! :) |
|
|
|
11/04/2005 07:40:44 AM · #16 |
Thanks for the comments... I'll know better next time!
KS |
|
|
|
11/04/2005 09:35:08 AM · #17 |
| Outtake would have been 3 points higher.. a MUCH better shot. |
|
|
|
11/04/2005 10:04:39 AM · #18 |
Oh hell yes! I gave your original a 3 and that was generious. No need for such out of focus shot and underexposure. I would've given higher marks for your "Should have." It would be a better shot if the dog was looking into the camera tho.
|
|
