Author | Thread |
|
08/01/2005 12:19:56 AM · #26 |
I will appologize now if I leave a comment on your photo and you don't like it to flippin bad. Please post it in the forum so I can have a laff at why it was bad. I know nothing and never claimed I did so IF I offended you then suck it up :D j/k
On a serious note... people have to understand that if there is a long exposure speed it does meet the challenge. After all that is what the challenge is about.
Again SUCK IT UP PPL ITS ONLY A COMMENT. lol j/k
edit:
You have rated 6 of 200 images (3%) in this challenge.
You have commented on 6 images (3%) in this challenge.
Hopefully I will comment on %100 this time.
Message edited by author 2005-08-01 00:23:34.
|
|
|
08/01/2005 12:40:11 AM · #27 |
NotOnline,
Where is a photo of yourself at? Scared of being critiqued by your peers? |
|
|
08/01/2005 12:53:31 AM · #28 |
Originally posted by ph223048: NotOnline,
Where is a photo of yourself at? Scared of being critiqued by your peers? |
People don't wanna see my picture. I the prime example of the east end of a dog headed west.
|
|
|
08/01/2005 12:55:13 AM · #29 |
Votes: 28
Views: 44
Avg Vote: 4.1429
Comments: 0
|
|
|
08/01/2005 12:58:08 AM · #30 |
Chele:
Looks like you are the victim of "NotOnline" |
|
|
08/01/2005 01:00:24 AM · #31 |
Originally posted by ph223048: Chele:
Looks like you are the victim of "NotOnline" |
Actually al the photos I have score thus far I have given my score with my comment. From what I've seen so far NOBODY deserves under a 5.
|
|
|
08/01/2005 01:05:18 AM · #32 |
I agree! This is a really good group of photos this challenge. Great work everyone...lots to look at this week. |
|
|
08/01/2005 01:08:55 AM · #33 |
Hopefully it stops going down! lol.. but still not bad
Votes: 25
Views: 54
Avg Vote: 6.3600
Comments: 0
Favorites: 1
|
|
|
08/01/2005 01:16:08 AM · #34 |
Originally posted by notonline: Originally posted by ph223048: Chele:
Looks like you are the victim of "NotOnline" |
Actually al the photos I have score thus far I have given my score with my comment. From what I've seen so far NOBODY deserves under a 5. |
it's going up a little. but now i'm afraid of the update button.
|
|
|
08/01/2005 01:17:51 AM · #35 |
Originally posted by chele: Originally posted by notonline: Originally posted by ph223048: Chele:
Looks like you are the victim of "NotOnline" |
Actually al the photos I have score thus far I have given my score with my comment. From what I've seen so far NOBODY deserves under a 5. |
it's going up a little. but now i'm afraid of the update button. |
Don't fear the dark side... lol
|
|
|
08/01/2005 01:20:10 AM · #36 |
...hitting the update button is like putting your finger in a light socket...
:-P
|
|
|
08/01/2005 01:22:37 AM · #37 |
Originally posted by taterbug: ...hitting the update button is like putting your finger in a light socket...
:-P |
actually I don't mind putting my finger in a light socket. It my tongue I can't stand when that happens.
edit:
You have rated 20 of 200 images (10%) in this challenge.
You have commented on 20 images (10%) in this challenge.
Message edited by author 2005-08-01 01:38:07.
|
|
|
08/01/2005 01:40:54 AM · #38 |
Votes: 25
Views: 60
Avg. 5.125
Man, I just KNEW this was going to be the one ..... (sigh)
VOTE PEOPLE - VOTE KINDLY FOR ME!!! LOL
Judy |
|
|
08/01/2005 01:42:17 AM · #39 |
Just had a runthrough of the challenge entries and, well...
I'm DOOOOOOOOOMED! DOOOOOOOMED I SAY, DOOOOOMED!
No seriously, awsome shots people:-)
|
|
|
08/01/2005 01:53:19 AM · #40 |
Okay, Im inspired. Everyone is getting a comment from me too! Please excuse me if my comment has been so irrelevant that you are a worse photogrpaher for having read it. Sometimes I go off in my own direction for a while and forget what the photo is about.
Im voting pretty generously this challenge, primarily because these pictures are fantastic!
My current score 4.03--1 comment |
|
|
08/01/2005 01:53:33 AM · #41 |
I've never had more fun looking at a challenge, myself. Man, these were good. I gave many 8's because there were so many awesome shots. Two 10's stuck out in my mind and only 2 4's. WOO HOO
Illusions?? Yikes... I don't know if I'm that brave.
J |
|
|
08/01/2005 01:57:54 AM · #42 |
Originally posted by Jutilda: I've never had more fun looking at a challenge, myself. Man, these were good. I gave many 8's because there were so many awesome shots. Two 10's stuck out in my mind and only 2 4's. WOO HOO
Illusions?? Yikes... I don't know if I'm that brave.
J |
Not that you should change your vote but the 2 photo's you gave 4's to did they have a longer then normal exposure??? If so, then wouldn't a 4 represent 40%??? which in my books is a failing grade. If it fits the challenge then should a photo not at least pass at 50%??? Just my opinion and not meant for debate. Is it also safe to say that you are done voting on the 200 photos in less then 2hrs??? Just an observation.
|
|
|
08/01/2005 02:03:46 AM · #43 |
I go with my gut on first review. Then I go back in a couple of days and redo what I think I misjudged in the first place. In the end, it's the final score that "counts." That's just my way of doing it.
I think 5 is average ok, ho hum, nothing special since it is in the middle between one and 10. If it is slightly below that then it will receive a 4. I'm sure everybody has their own method. I read one post where somebody said he gave mostly 4's and 5's to everybody. WOW - that's being negative!!! J |
|
|
08/01/2005 02:06:16 AM · #44 |
I wasn't complain, I was trying to understand. Hope I didn't offend you.
|
|
|
08/01/2005 02:06:58 AM · #45 |
Originally posted by notonline: Originally posted by Jutilda: I've never had more fun looking at a challenge, myself. Man, these were good. I gave many 8's because there were so many awesome shots. Two 10's stuck out in my mind and only 2 4's. WOO HOO
Illusions?? Yikes... I don't know if I'm that brave.
J |
Not that you should change your vote but the 2 photo's you gave 4's to did they have a longer then normal exposure??? If so, then wouldn't a 4 represent 40%??? which in my books is a failing grade. If it fits the challenge then should a photo not at least pass at 50%??? Just my opinion and not meant for debate. Is it also safe to say that you are done voting on the 200 photos in less then 2hrs??? Just an observation. |
I didn't know we pass and fail marks ?? everyone has their own scale within the 1 - 10 range.
If someone has voted 200 images in 2 hours so what !! to me thats about 30 sec per photo which would probably be longer then the average voter for the sight.
|
|
|
08/01/2005 02:07:04 AM · #46 |
just want to be part of a late night discussion ... k im done
Votes: 31
Views: 64
Avg Vote: 5.0968
Comments: 1
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 08/01/05 02:00 am
|
|
|
08/01/2005 02:08:57 AM · #47 |
No offense taken.
I'll ponder them again many times before the challenge is over. These were so good. I wish more were as interesting and unique. At least there's no toilets or bark!!!!
J |
|
|
08/01/2005 02:14:20 AM · #48 |
Originally posted by keegbow: Originally posted by notonline: Originally posted by Jutilda: I've never had more fun looking at a challenge, myself. Man, these were good. I gave many 8's because there were so many awesome shots. Two 10's stuck out in my mind and only 2 4's. WOO HOO
Illusions?? Yikes... I don't know if I'm that brave.
J |
Not that you should change your vote but the 2 photo's you gave 4's to did they have a longer then normal exposure??? If so, then wouldn't a 4 represent 40%??? which in my books is a failing grade. If it fits the challenge then should a photo not at least pass at 50%??? Just my opinion and not meant for debate. Is it also safe to say that you are done voting on the 200 photos in less then 2hrs??? Just an observation. |
I didn't know we pass and fail marks ?? everyone has their own scale within the 1 - 10 range.
If someone has voted 200 images in 2 hours so what !! to me thats about 30 sec per photo which would probably be longer then the average voter for the sight. |
This isn't the thread to debate it as I said it wasn't open for discussion or to argue about. I was merely trying to understand how some of the people work in here. See my post above yours.
|
|
|
08/01/2005 02:16:28 AM · #49 |
Anything posted here by anyone IS open for discussion unless you are SC and the thread is locked. |
|
|
08/01/2005 02:18:08 AM · #50 |
Originally posted by keegbow: Anything posted here by anyone IS open for discussion unless you are SC and the thread is locked. |
Thats not the point. I'm sure the thread was started to post scores not debate a specific subject that has been overly debated before.
|
|