|
| Author | Thread |
|
|
05/04/2003 05:04:40 PM · #1 |
Since the S50 hit the market a few months ago I have been looking long and hard at how I could justify getting one. I figured, Wow! 2 more megapixels! that would be just awesome!
Well, in my little impromptu test at Best Buy today, I have decided that, for me at least, its not worth the money. I just happened to be in the store to purchase some photo paper, and stepped over to take another look at the S50. As I was checking it out I realized that I had my camera in my pocket, so I asked the salesman if he had any objections to my popping in my own compact flash card and snapping a few shots with it. He was cool with that. So I snapped a rather hasty couple of pics (the control layout is identical, except for the Func feature, but the menu systems are not quite the same).
I did manage to get the camera set to RAW mode (since I shoot in RAW) but neglected to check the sharpness, contrast, and saturation values... exif data shows they were set to NORMAL. (I always keep mine turned LOW). Also, I keep my exposure compensation set to -1/3, the S50 appears to have been set to Normal. So these are some of the reasons for the different color in the two pics. Both were shot at iso 50. Only RAW converson and cropping at 1:1 has been done. No other modifications were made.
S30 crop //www.dpchallenge.com/image.php?IMAGE_ID=20425
S50 crop //www.dpchallenge.com/image.php?IMAGE_ID=20426
As you can see, there is a nice increase in file size, and the colors are obviously not the same (see details on exposure above) but overall, to my eye anyway, they are about the same in the resolution department.
At first I was surprised... but then I thought, well, it IS the same lens. Why should another 2 megapixels make it jump up and do the Fandango? Obviously it shouldn't, and it doesn't. Granted there are some really nice new features, like focus bracketing, but for image quality you might want to consider saving your dough for something else. |
|
|
|
05/04/2003 05:20:57 PM · #2 |
I am going to have to agree with you on this one. I too looked at the S50 and wasn't supremely impressed. It does offer a higher number of megapixels but Canon has yet to approve upon it's lense for the whole series (S30, S40, S45, S50). Not recommended for a previous Canon user.
E.J. |
|
|
|
05/04/2003 06:15:49 PM · #3 |
I really do not see how this kind of a test will prove anything, why do you expect to see a difference in such a low resolution subject on your monitor? If you are looking for an optical resolution increase, you would need to photograph a test pattern with lines closer and closer together to see if there is any increase. Photographing a person would have been a good test, as how well eyelashes or eyebrows were defined my have been tellilng.
But in practicle terms, the only gain you will get from going from 3 to 5mp is if you are printing large images. If you do not need 11x14+ images regularly, than forget about it.
|
|
|
|
05/04/2003 06:16:22 PM · #4 |
At the risk of joining the band wagon, I agree. I went with the S30 over the S40 b/c I didn't think the resolution change justified the extra money, and I still feel that way. The only thing I would get after the S30 would be a DSLR, and since I don't have that kind of money nor really the need for something that advanced, the S30 will more than handle the job for me.
|
|
|
|
Current Server Time: 09/07/2025 05:55:07 AM  |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/07/2025 05:55:07 AM EDT.
|
