| Author | Thread | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/22/2005 02:32:35 AM · #1			 | 
		
		Please lets not have a 100 entries focused around film and film cameras.
 
 Personally I'll be voting for the more creative interpretations (e.g. A Motocycle parked in front of a hitching post!)
 
 Could be a good challenge....
 
 
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/22/2005 02:48:05 AM · #2			 | 
		
		| haha- the exception is that you can't use people. I wonder who would actually model for such a photo!? |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/22/2005 02:49:07 AM · #3			 | 
		
		| You can always do a self-portrait. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/22/2005 02:57:30 AM · #4			 | 
		
		lol...thanks for the laugh... :D
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/22/2005 03:02:05 AM · #5			 | 
		
		Give up now. Your puny pictures can not hold a candle to what I have in store. Save yourself embarassment and just let this challenge go.
 
 Walk away,
 Just walk away... |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/22/2005 03:03:48 AM · #6			 | 
		
		| Hey!! You better not turn this into the obsolete smack-talk thread! And we all know that my photo is going to take yours down, so you can just walk away. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/22/2005 03:04:59 AM · #7			 | 
		
		| My picture can beat up your picture! |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/22/2005 03:09:08 AM · #8			 | 
		
		Originally posted by Jason:   Give up now. Your puny pictures can not hold a candle to what I have in store. Save yourself embarassment and just let this challenge go.
 
 Walk away,
 Just walk away...  |   
 
 You must be Slipstrike in disguise to be trashtalking like that.
 What happened? The Slipstrike ego has become obsolete?
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/22/2005 03:19:59 AM · #9			 | 
		
		| Phonograph pictures will outnumber cameras and film. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/22/2005 03:25:23 AM · #10			 | 
		
		Originally posted by clicker:   Phonograph pictures will outnumber cameras and film.  |   
 
 typewriters, rotary-dial phones, mechanical alarm clocks, the church ;-)
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/22/2005 03:29:51 AM · #11			 | 
		
		| dont forget cheese... no one uses cheese anymore ; ) |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/22/2005 03:30:32 AM · #12			 | 
		
		| Where are my 8 track tapes? ;) |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/22/2005 03:36:09 AM · #13			 | 
		
		Originally posted by thewriterside:   dont forget cheese... no one uses cheese anymore ; )  |   
 
 What. The. Crap.
 
 No clue what you're talking about. :-| |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/22/2005 06:30:34 AM · #14			 | 
		
		Thinking of how I can photograph common sense. It seems to have been phased out of all aspects of society.
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/22/2005 07:00:21 AM · #15			 | 
		
		Originally posted by skylen:   Originally posted by thewriterside:   dont forget cheese... no one uses cheese anymore ; )  |   
 
 What. The. Crap.
 
 No clue what you're talking about. :-|  |   
 
 Obsolete things were being named. My random sense of humor decided to add something to the list and I happened to be eating some cheese at the time. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/22/2005 08:11:16 AM · #16			 | 
		
		The Church?!  Not obsolete in our neck of the woods - still building them at a pretty good clip.  ;^)
 
 Originally posted by rgo:  ...typewriters, rotary-dial phones, mechanical alarm clocks, the church ;-)  |  
 
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/22/2005 08:16:18 AM · #17			 | 
		
		More of the obsolete that we could attempt to take photos of-
 
 Michael Jackson trials, relationships between celebrities, syphilis in palm springs, infomercials at 2am. Oh...wait..never mind. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/22/2005 08:22:14 AM · #18			 | 
		
		Originally posted by rgo:   Originally posted by Jason:   Give up now. Your puny pictures can not hold a candle to what I have in store. Save yourself embarassment and just let this challenge go.
 
 Walk away,
 Just walk away...  |   
 
 You must be Slipstrike in disguise to be trashtalking like that.
 What happened? The Slipstrike ego has become obsolete?  |   
 
 Oh my, tell me I'm not on someone's 'Enemies' list!
  
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/24/2005 12:49:56 PM · #19			 | 
		
		Okay, I've got a question about the "no people alive or dead" stipulation--
 
 I interpret this to mean that you can't take a photo of someone as the subject (e.g. person's dead now they're obsolete, or picture of an adult as an obsolete child, that kind of thing.)
 
 What about a person doing a task that is now obsolete?  What about a person's hand or foot or something like that?  I'd hate to submit a photo and have it be disqualified because it had someone's foot in it.
 
 Reading through this, it sounds so silly, but it's a real concern!  Any thoughts?
 Thanks,
 Jeannel |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/24/2005 12:55:52 PM · #20			 | 
		
		I think your interpretation is correct - people can't be the main subject, but a person can be in the photo.  JMO
 
 Originally posted by tpoc:   Okay, I've got a question about the "no people alive or dead" stipulation--
 
 I interpret this to mean that you can't take a photo of someone as the subject (e.g. person's dead now they're obsolete, or picture of an adult as an obsolete child, that kind of thing.)
 
 What about a person doing a task that is now obsolete?  What about a person's hand or foot or something like that?  I'd hate to submit a photo and have it be disqualified because it had someone's foot in it.
 
 Reading through this, it sounds so silly, but it's a real concern!  Any thoughts?
 Thanks,
 Jeannel  |  
 
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/26/2005 12:04:09 AM · #21			 | 
		
		What about an activity, a profession, or a trade that's now obsolete?  For example, would it violate the "no people" rule if I photographed something that indicated "milkman" (in the U.S., when I was a kid, the milkman would deliver bottles of milk to our door several time a week), - without actually having a milkman in the photo?
 
 [Note: I obviously won't produce this image since I opened my big mouth to discuss it here...] |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/26/2005 12:44:06 AM · #22			 | 
		
		| I can't think of anything! I thought about a checkbook, because I really don't use it. Then I thought about eating some brownies and I gave up. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/26/2005 12:48:43 AM · #23			 | 
		
		lets see how many beautiful sunsets and flowers try and get passed off in this challenge   LOL!
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/26/2005 12:51:30 AM · #24			 | 
		
		Originally posted by Strikeslip:   Originally posted by rgo:   Originally posted by Jason:   Give up now. Your puny pictures can not hold a candle to what I have in store. Save yourself embarassment and just let this challenge go.
 
 Walk away,
 Just walk away...  |   
 
 You must be Slipstrike in disguise to be trashtalking like that.
 What happened? The Slipstrike ego has become obsolete?  |   
 
 Oh my, tell me I'm not on someone's 'Enemies' list!
    |   
 
 bah :P I think you need new slipmoticons.
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
06/26/2005 02:24:48 AM · #25			 | 
		
		Actually, I find this challenge to be difficult, what with this day and age of recycling and reuse.  Let the best photograph win!  Or mine....
  |  
  | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 11/04/2025 02:51:43 AM EST.