| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/01/2002 04:54:02 PM · #26 |
Originally posted by dimitrii:
I agree about not discussing a contest which we are voting at the moment.
The picture just has to be visually, grabbing, stimulating or pleasing and win on that merit.
We do have an option of creating an interesting title that may help people understand your intent better.
I didn't mean to upset anyone over discussion of my own photo in the current challenge. I have not revealed which specific photo belongs to me. And, in fact, I am speaking of a general issue which is a byproduct of the challenge process.
I agree that the photo must be all of those compelling things. My simple statement was that I believe my photo has the potential of having its "grabbing, stimulating, or pleasing" nature diluted by the coincidental occurrence of many of a similar type.
To be honest, I'm not particularly pleased with my shot at all, but I do think that, singularly, it has some merit.
mjcecil
|
|
|
|
10/01/2002 05:02:21 PM · #27 |
Originally posted by JohnSetzler :
Davinci's Mona Lisa: Too Dark
Michaelangelo's David: Bad Crop
Whoever's Son of Man: I would like it better if the hat was red
Van Gogh's Starry Night: Its out of focus
Monet's Sunflowers: shoulnd't have cropped the flowers on the right
Gaugin's "Woman with Mango": should have used an apple
Caravaggio's Doubting Thomas: way too dark
Seurat's A Sunday in the Park - Too grainy
Warhol's 200 Campbell's Soup Cans - Too setup
-Terry
* This message has been edited by the author on 10/1/2002 5:13:32 PM.
* This message has been edited by the author on 10/1/2002 5:18:52 PM.
|
|
|
|
10/01/2002 05:17:26 PM · #28 |
If you are going to be like that about it
Sistine Chapel: Illegal dimensions
Moonrise, Hernandez, Ansel Adams: DQ for spot editing
Edward Weston, Peppers #30: Too much colour manipulation
Christ of Saint John of the Cross, Salvidor Dali: This a composite image
|
|
|
|
10/01/2002 05:38:16 PM · #29 |
ok .. I like that a lot .. but try to provide links guys !!!!!
|
|
|
|
10/01/2002 05:43:37 PM · #30 |
| hopper nighthawks : obviously a setup : Not candid !! |
|
|
|
10/01/2002 05:50:46 PM · #31 |
Originally posted by lionelm:
ok .. I like that a lot .. but try to provide links guys !!!!!
Try www.google.com and search for them, in the 'Images' section
of the search engine. You may want to switch on 'safe searches'
to minmise any nudity/ porn.
|
|
|
|
10/01/2002 06:39:14 PM · #32 |
Originally posted by ClubJuggle:
Originally posted by JohnSetzler :
[i]Davinci's Mona Lisa: Too Dark
Michaelangelo's David: Bad Crop
Whoever's Son of Man: I would like it better if the hat was red
Van Gogh's Starry Night: Its out of focus
Monet's Sunflowers: shoulnd't have cropped the flowers on the right
Gaugin's "Woman with Mango": should have used an apple
Caravaggio's Doubting Thomas: way too dark
ROFL!!!!! John that's hilarious!
And "Son of Man" was Magritte, unless your're talking about my rendition.
-Terry
[/i]
Terry, your version of Magritte's Son of Man was stupendous. I love Magritte and I thoughroughly enjoyed your homage.
aldo
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/19/2025 02:02:05 AM EDT.
