Author | Thread |
|
06/13/2005 10:41:05 PM · #1 |
Is drawing something and incorporating it in the image allowed in this? I'm not talking about post-production. |
|
|
06/13/2005 10:44:20 PM · #2 |
yes

|
|
|
06/14/2005 03:13:17 AM · #3 |
I don't understand, then what do they mean by 'You may not post-process your entry from or to include elements of multiple images, multiple exposures, clip art, computer-rendered images, or elements from other photographs'?
Isn't your drawing and the pencil consisting of two elements? I mean, two different photo's joined together?
I'm getting a bit confused.
|
|
|
06/14/2005 03:41:22 AM · #4 |
You can print out a pic or project it or display it on a monitor and use that in the composition of the final photo. I know, it's a gray area, but lots of precedent...
- - 
Message edited by author 2005-06-14 03:41:57.
|
|
|
06/14/2005 04:15:00 AM · #5 |
There are `grey areas` and then there are blatantly photoshopped images :P |
|
|
06/14/2005 05:29:04 AM · #6 |
Does this meen a use of gradient is ok ? ie sunshine rays ect. ect |
|
|
06/14/2005 05:39:19 AM · #7 |
I think, that the use of printed images and/or monitors shouldn't be allowed at dpc...
I could just make a cool looking 3D model, print it and take a picture of it. It's not photography anymore |
|
|
06/14/2005 05:41:58 AM · #8 |
Originally posted by Uusilehto: ...
I could just make a cool looking 3D model, print it and take a picture of it. It's not photography anymore |
That's why it's not allowed. Using it as a background is a different story. |
|
|
06/14/2005 07:00:07 AM · #9 |
i am so confused...ok i can take a photo and scramble its components as long as everything in the photo comes from the same original...correct????
|
|
|
06/14/2005 07:19:04 AM · #10 |
Originally posted by Titia: I don't understand, then what do they mean by 'You may not post-process your entry from or to include elements of multiple images, multiple exposures, clip art, computer-rendered images, or elements from other photographs'? |
Those elements weren't added in post-processing. They were in the original capture. They're not literal representations of artwork either because there are 'real' elements in the photo in addition to the artwork. |
|
|
06/14/2005 07:20:02 AM · #11 |
Originally posted by buzzmom: i am so confused...ok i can take a photo and scramble its components as long as everything in the photo comes from the same original...correct???? |
No, you can't move objects to different locations in Photoshop. |
|
|
06/14/2005 07:46:47 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by Titia: I don't understand, then what do they mean by 'You may not post-process your entry from or to include elements of multiple images, multiple exposures, clip art, computer-rendered images, or elements from other photographs'?
Isn't your drawing and the pencil consisting of two elements? I mean, two different photo's joined together?
I'm getting a bit confused. |
I believe this is refering to adding those items in post processing, if they are part of the original photograph that is a different story...I could be wrong though, I have been dq'd for taking a picture of an item I created and printed but I think that is because it didn't have any real items in it. |
|
|
06/14/2005 10:10:27 PM · #13 |
Ok, I get the picture. The pencil wasn't added later on, but photographed same time with the drawing.
|
|
|
06/15/2005 10:27:54 PM · #14 |
I had a submission but I retracted it because I thought it might go against the rules. I'm relatively new, so tell me if you have an image and then you change it using software, but nothing is changed other than what the software does to it, then it's ok???
This can be frustrating sometimes. Thanks for the info! |
|
|
06/15/2005 10:53:12 PM · #15 |
Could you be a little more specific? |
|
|
06/15/2005 11:35:10 PM · #16 |
Ok, can you solarize and spherize (distort round) a photo so that it looks nothing like the original, yet you've not added or detracted anything other than what the software did?
thanks |
|
|
06/16/2005 12:13:02 AM · #17 |
Solarize should be OK, but whatever software tools you use cannot obscure major elements in the photo. If the distortion is so extreme that significant objects in the original are no longer recognizable in the final, then it will likely be DQ'd. |
|
|
06/16/2005 12:45:47 AM · #18 |
Ok, that's what I thought. OH well... it was a fun whim. I'll have to figure out something else. Thanks for the info. |
|
|
06/16/2005 01:13:42 AM · #19 |
took this shot on Saturday at a concert, not sure what happened but it I love the look of this shot and tooooo early for the fantasy challenge. Comments?
 |
|
|
06/16/2005 01:49:59 AM · #20 |
Originally posted by khdoss: took this shot on Saturday at a concert, not sure what happened but it I love the look of this shot and tooooo early for the fantasy challenge. Comments?
|
coooooooool, whats the exif on it? its a very interesting effect...
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/03/2025 05:28:30 PM EDT.