Author | Thread |
|
06/06/2005 01:51:35 PM · #1 |
Anyone have any comments on what is the best all around zoom for the Canon 20D? or walk around lens?
Doesn't have to be Canon just to fit a canon. Doesn't have to be zoom.
Please say why you like it so much. |
|
|
06/06/2005 01:55:09 PM · #2 |
Well that´s always a matter of opinion but if you want mine it´s the 24-70L. |
|
|
06/06/2005 01:59:24 PM · #3 |
When I used my D Rebel it was the 16-35 f/2.8, now with the 1D II it is the 24-70. Depends on your shooting style. I like wider angles. |
|
|
06/06/2005 02:02:13 PM · #4 |
I like the 17-40 f/4, because it zooms out to the 35mm equivalent of 27mm for a 1.6 crop factor camera. I like the wide stuff, so the 24-70L wouldn't be wide enough for me on a 20D. |
|
|
06/06/2005 02:16:15 PM · #5 |
I'm in the same boat... looking for a good buy with backpay money.
So what's up with getting rid of the Canon 17-40mm f/4? Don't like it?
|
|
|
06/06/2005 02:17:26 PM · #6 |
I do like the wide angle but would like some reach too. I would sacrafic both for sharpness. |
|
|
06/06/2005 02:18:48 PM · #7 |
Tamron 28-75 XR Di f/2.8... it's extremely sharp throughout the zoom range, works well in low light, and it's a third the price of the Canon 24-70. Unless I have a specific need for wide angle or a long zoom, this is the lens that's on my camera. For greater range, the Canon 17-85 IS would be a good choice.
Message edited by author 2005-06-06 14:26:47. |
|
|
06/06/2005 02:20:49 PM · #8 |
Not the sharpest lens, but very functional and handy, Canon 28-135 IS.
|
|
|
06/06/2005 02:21:33 PM · #9 |
I wouldn`t be without my sigma 18-125mm lens.. It can`t be beaten for a walkaround lens and sharper than the kit lens.
|
|
|
06/06/2005 02:21:39 PM · #10 |
For a walkaround lens I used to say the 17-40mm F/4L, but I recently bought a 24-70mm F/2.8L and I am just amazed at the sharpness and overall quality of the lens. If I know I need to have the wide angle the 17-40mm is still my choice (I'm definitely not selling that lens) but for just generally walking around I have a feeling I will be using the 24-70mm more. It's just that much fun to use. |
|
|
06/06/2005 02:22:16 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by Corwyn: I do like the wide angle but would like some reach too. I would sacrafic both for sharpness. |
So you're saying that your canon 17-40mm isn't sharp? That sux.
I'm good for reach right now. The Canon 300mm f/4 L IS is my favourite lens at the moment. Will be purchasing Canon 1.4x converter to go with it shortly.
|
|
|
06/06/2005 02:22:18 PM · #12 |
I can justify having this lens. I've owned it now for 4 months and used it maybe 6 times. That 1000$ canadian dollars sitting in waste. I do you my 28-135 a little more but would like something a little wider.
Originally posted by Beagleboy: I'm in the same boat... looking for a good buy with backpay money.
So what's up with getting rid of the Canon 17-40mm f/4? Don't like it? |
|
|
|
06/06/2005 02:22:54 PM · #13 |
The 17-40 is supersharp but no lenght.
Originally posted by Beagleboy: Originally posted by Corwyn: I do like the wide angle but would like some reach too. I would sacrafic both for sharpness. |
So you're saying that your canon 17-40mm isn't sharp? That sux.
I'm good for reach right now. The Canon 300mm f/4 L IS is my favourite lens at the moment. Will be purchasing Canon 1.4x converter to go with it shortly. |
|
|
|
06/06/2005 02:30:12 PM · #14 |
without owning one... I think the best all around lens for me would be the 70-200L 2.8 IS. But it might be a too short some of the time.
|
|
|
06/06/2005 02:34:28 PM · #15 |
the 17-40L is very good, but not the best walkaround lens since it's just wideangle, the 28-135 isn't the best either since it's 45-216 on 1.6 crop.
the Tamron 28-75 f2.8 is great, but I think the new Canon EF-S 17-85 IS is the best walkaround today, on 1.6crop it has the same angle as the 28-135 IS but the optics are much better.
as for the 24-70L, it's great, but it is way to heavy for a walkaround, and it costs an arm & a leg ;) |
|
|
06/06/2005 02:39:00 PM · #16 |
Originally posted by kyebosh: without owning one... I think the best all around lens for me would be the 70-200L 2.8 IS. But it might be a too short some of the time. |
I have the 70-200L f2.8 IS, and as a walkaround.. well it's so heavy that your neck starts to hurt after 20 minutes, due to the weight of the camera+lens. (using the neckstrap) |
|
|
06/06/2005 02:39:05 PM · #17 |
That's a very good point; the 24-70 does indeed weigh a ton. And I am sure it just gets magnified after carrying it all day. Something to consider. |
|
|
06/06/2005 02:39:21 PM · #18 |
Without any HOPE of owning one... I think the best all around lens would be the Canon 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L. ;-D |
|
|
06/06/2005 02:41:23 PM · #19 |
Now there is some weight to lug around :-) |
|
|
06/06/2005 02:41:31 PM · #20 |
What about the 17-85mm IS.
Anyone own one??? |
|
|
06/06/2005 02:43:53 PM · #21 |
Now this isn't a zoom, but it has to be the best to carry around with you for walk around shooting :)
 |
|
|
06/06/2005 02:48:15 PM · #22 |
Originally posted by DanSig: Originally posted by kyebosh: without owning one... I think the best all around lens for me would be the 70-200L 2.8 IS. But it might be a too short some of the time. |
I have the 70-200L f2.8 IS, and as a walkaround.. well it's so heavy that your neck starts to hurt after 20 minutes, due to the weight of the camera+lens. (using the neckstrap) |
I have the 80-200L which weighs similarly to that one. I don't find it too heavy at all to walk around with.
|
|
|
06/06/2005 03:43:57 PM · #23 |
Besides the kit lens, I have the 24-70 L, and the 70-200 2.8 L IS. The 17-40 is in the mail as well. Up till now, the 24-70 is my no doubt favorite for a walk around lens. While it is heavy, it's not near as bad as the 70-200, and for what I shoot, more versatile. Note that I do not carry my camera on a neck strap, but with the wrist strap, and after a day of wandering around, I really don't feel it that much. At any rate, not enough to trade in for something less. Good luck.
|
|
|
06/06/2005 05:07:02 PM · #24 |
Originally posted by bruski: Now this isn't a zoom, but it has to be the best to carry around with you for walk around shooting :)
|
I agree, cause you don't have to get as close to your subject.....less walking! :-)
|
|
|
06/06/2005 06:13:28 PM · #25 |
You have 12 suggestions so far. Are you any closer to your final decision?
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/03/2025 07:03:56 AM EDT.