Author | Thread |
|
04/18/2003 08:45:15 AM · #1 |
Well, I picked up my 10D yesterday morning.
I posted a few test shots Here. All the shots have been resized to 1200x800 with Photoshop 7 and saved under a quality of 7 (I only have access to a dial-up connection for the next few days). No editing whatsoever.
I'm very pleased with both the 28-135mm IS and the 75-300mm IS. The Autofocus is great and works very well in low light conditions.
Woo hoo, now I'm part of team 10D. :)
|
|
|
04/18/2003 09:10:50 AM · #2 |
Good luck with the new cam. Make sure you spend some time with the manual and get aquainted with all the bells and whistles. Nice camera :)
|
|
|
04/18/2003 09:11:02 AM · #3 |
mine needs to ship out now, nice pics
|
|
|
04/18/2003 09:19:36 AM · #4 |
Hi Jacques,
Very nice, very nice indeed. Not too bad for a Canon - of course, Nikon images would have added more punch. [grin].
I look forward to seeing more of these wonderful shots and especially in the Flora and Fauna challenges. It looks like you were out shooting birds, so is that one of your subjects? With that new long zoom of yours it can make the images even grander with the extra 1.6x magnification ratio from the chip, so you should be able to get in real tight. Lots of fun.
Cheers,
Michael
{the self-proclaimed Nikon King bows respectfully towards the east to acknowledge the new King of Canon}
|
|
|
04/18/2003 09:54:54 AM · #5 |
congrats, dude :)
for more 10D Flavah, go here
Tests with superzoom and macro, portraits with strobes, white balance comparison with Olympus E-10 and more .. :-D
Message edited by author 2003-04-18 09:57:45.
|
|
|
04/18/2003 10:33:24 AM · #6 |
Nice one - you realise if you don't have a ribbion within the first 4 challenges you have to send it back ? |
|
|
04/18/2003 10:49:54 AM · #7 |
Congrats :) Though, I think the 75-300 mm lens is a bit soft.
Originally posted by Jacko: Well, I picked up my 10D yesterday morning.
I posted a few test shots Here. All the shots have been resized to 1200x800 with Photoshop 7 and saved under a quality of 7 (I only have access to a dial-up connection for the next few days). No editing whatsoever.
I'm very pleased with both the 28-135mm IS and the 75-300mm IS. The Autofocus is great and works very well in low light conditions.
Woo hoo, now I'm part of team 10D. :) |
|
|
|
04/18/2003 11:02:03 AM · #8 |
Yup, the 75-300mm is a bit soft around the 300mm level, but not too bad 220mm and under (equivalent to 350mm on a 35mm camera). Still workable with 300mm (480mm equivalent) in my opinion. The Image Stabilisation comes in handy at that level. The 28-135mm seems to be sharper.
[quote=paganini]Congrats :) Though, I think the 75-300 mm lens is a bit soft.
|
|
|
04/18/2003 11:03:17 AM · #9 |
Hey Mag! Get rid of that Olympus E-10 under your name. Not thinking about returning the 10D are you? lol. :)
|
|
|
04/18/2003 11:12:12 AM · #10 |
Congrats, Jacko. I picked up an F717 yesterday, though it was sitting right next to a 10D in the display case. For a moment I thought about it (a mere $2500 CDN) but I swear I could feel my Visa card recoil in my hands...
I'm incredibly pleased with the quality of the F717, for my needs it's perfect. I'm looking forward to doing some serious battle with you guys now that I've got a fairly respectable tool. Consider the gloves off!
And, go Canucks!
James.
Message edited by author 2003-04-18 11:14:56. |
|
|
04/18/2003 11:12:35 AM · #11 |
I don̢۪t think the 75-300 is quite as bad as some people make it out to be. This shot is not from the IS version and it does not show the edges of the frame and I did use Fred̢۪s CS Pro 2.0 to sharpen it set to low intensity. I don̢۪t think it is that soft really. Maybe I am crazy?
//forums.consumerreview.com/crforum?14@98.aOyIaPqotzK.1@.efc8c72
Greg
|
|
|
04/18/2003 04:04:39 PM · #12 |
The 75-300mm has had alot of bad rap with their earlier models. People buying the newer ones appear to get better results.
Nice shot by the way. Very crisp.
|
|
|
04/18/2003 04:41:51 PM · #13 |
Nice shot!
I just got mine but I took this the other day. lots of fun, cant wait til the weather gets better and i can go out and play more!
Full Sized Version
[quote=dadas115]I don̢۪t think the 75-300 is quite as bad as some people make it out to be. This shot is not from the IS version and it does not show the edges of the frame and I did use Fred̢۪s CS Pro 2.0 to sharpen it set to low intensity. I don̢۪t think it is that soft really. Maybe I am crazy?
//forums.consumerreview.com/crforum?14@98.aOyIaPqotzK.1@.efc8c72
Greg
|
|
|
04/18/2003 04:49:31 PM · #14 |
No, but I feel like if I change it on here, then I will be betraying my E-10 even more than I already did by getting the 10D. Lol.
Originally posted by Jacko: Hey Mag! Get rid of that Olympus E-10 under your name. Not thinking about returning the 10D are you? lol. :) |
|
|
|
04/18/2003 10:46:23 PM · #15 |
A few more pics with the Canon 10D and 28-135mm IS and the 75-300mm IS.
Tomorrow I'll try to shoot some nice photos instead of 1 snapshot every 3 seconds. lol I'm going with Refracted tomorrow to the local zoo.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/25/2025 09:52:01 PM EDT.