DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Tips, Tricks, and Q&A >> Exposure Blues...
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 6 of 6, (reverse)
AuthorThread
04/15/2003 01:21:44 PM · #1
It seems I can never properly expose my shots. Many are slightly under-exposed, many slightly over-exposed. I know, I can adjust the brightness in post-processing, but it doesn't seem to be quite as good as just adjusting the exposure. Can someone give some hints on how to best determine necessary exposure?
04/15/2003 01:25:58 PM · #2


Well you can always bracket your shots.

04/15/2003 01:29:51 PM · #3
The book 'Understanding Exposure' by Bryan Paterson is pretty good on this topic... I think there is a new edition coming out quite soon.

Also if your camera has a histogram function, that can help you learn.

Message edited by author 2003-04-15 13:30:06.
04/15/2003 03:09:31 PM · #4
Keep in mind also that cameras' internal exposure meter has its own issues.

It's similar to FILM.... you can buy for example a Velvia film, rated ISO 64, though in cameras such as NIkon, you'd use ISO 50, which is about 1/3 less than what the label says.

Similarly for digital, you can't simply do spot metering using a spot meter (not from within the camera) and use the exposure reading, because they'll vary between the camera brands. You have to compensate by a factor from the reading.

Rules such as "metering off snow and add +2 stop" is fine, however, for digital, if you use the in-camera metering system, you may have to adjust it up by 1/2 stop or lower by 1/2 stop.
04/15/2003 03:16:59 PM · #5
I would suggest doing some tests metering off a gray card and using different levels of compensation to determine what is right for your camera. I have found that exposure meters vary from camera to camera even within the same brand and model. I did some tests of my 1D against a friend’s 1D and found that his meter was about ½ stop under mine.

Greg
04/15/2003 03:45:18 PM · #6
Yeah this is a good thing to do.

Eventually if you shoot a lot you will know given a scene whether you need to compensate one way or the other.

Anyway, with digital it's always better to underexpose, as you can recover the darkened image, versus "clipped" or blown image losing the highlights. You don't want to be too underexposed as noise levels will affect image quality but 1/3 - 1/2 stops would be no problem.


Originally posted by dadas115:

I would suggest doing some tests metering off a gray card and using different levels of compensation to determine what is right for your camera. I have found that exposure meters vary from camera to camera even within the same brand and model. I did some tests of my 1D against a friend’s 1D and found that his meter was about ½ stop under mine.

Greg
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 08/26/2025 11:33:56 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/26/2025 11:33:56 PM EDT.