| Author | Thread | 
		
			|  | 01/19/2005 04:22:42 PM · #1 | 
		| | Okay, it's time to move beyond my kit lens.  Which would you choose? 
 I've heard that the 50mm 1.8 II is a no-brainer for the price (ca. $120 CAD) but I've heard another photographer say he would definitely buy the Sigma 24-70 instead (on sale for $150 CAD).
 
 What do you recommend?  A better walk around with nice range or a nice, fast prime?
 
 Anything else in the $150 - $200 range you would recommend instead?
 
 
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/19/2005 04:25:21 PM · #2 | 
		| | unless u need need need the zoom, 1.8 is the way to go. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/19/2005 04:35:27 PM · #3 | 
		| | The f1.8 is a steal at the price, its very fast at focusing, and you get pictures like this 
 
   
 ... well I am biased, its my Grandson!
 
 Message edited by author 2005-01-19 16:36:33.
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/19/2005 04:42:48 PM · #4 | 
		| | I have de Canon 50mm, and is a really good lens (IMHO), it will help you a lot in very low light situations, and I enjoy play around with the depth of field. That is the first lens I bought for mine and no regreats. Besides if you have the kit lens you already have the a lot of that area covered. 
 In the $150-$200 I bought the Tamron 70-300 LD Macro, I like it, a little bit heavy and a little slow (4.0-5.6) but I have gotten really good results, and the macro function is really cool on that one. I got that one for 150 USD.
 
 My 2 cents only... hope it helps.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/19/2005 04:45:12 PM · #5 | 
		| | The 50 1.8 is incredible for the price. It's a great lens, and that's not just "in my opinion". No one can deny the value of this lens. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/19/2005 04:52:12 PM · #6 | 
		| | Since you have the kit lens I would vote for the 50mm f1.8 as well.  I have this lens  and really like the results I get with it, especially in low light situations. 
 A couple examples with the lens.
 
 
   
 Message edited by author 2005-01-19 16:54:13.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/19/2005 05:28:40 PM · #7 | 
		| | I have EF lenses that cost in the thousands and I also own the 50 f/1.8. I will tell you it is a good sharp lens, price or no. The Sigma 24-70 isn't even on my wish list. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/19/2005 05:39:54 PM · #8 | 
		| | Cool, thanks everyone...50mm1.8 it is. 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/19/2005 06:49:41 PM · #9 | 
		| | The canon 50mm f1.8 is my cheapest and sharpest lens. This is at 1.8 hand held in a very dim room. Very shallow dof but not unuseable.
 
  
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/19/2005 06:52:19 PM · #10 | 
		| | shallow is good here if you ask me, and generally i like shallow DOF over deep.  but that's just me.  f:1.8 is good for making shallow DOF ;} i own it, and haven't a complaint.
 
 Message edited by author 2005-01-19 18:52:38.
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/19/2005 08:05:24 PM · #11 | 
		| | Another plug for the 50...  You need one, and at the price it's a crime not to own one. 
 My addtions for the shots from this lens..
 
       
 Go now, buy... :-)
 
 Cheers, Chris H.
 
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/19/2005 08:17:18 PM · #12 | 
		| | Mike, 
 Besides the kit lens, the 50mm 1.8mm is the only other one I own. I love it. Actually, it hasn't been off the camera since I got it before Christmas. It's a bit loud but it focuses very fast and is very sharp. Also by not having the zoom to depend on I'm forcing myself to work on my composition skills - a side benefit.
 
 Owen
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/19/2005 08:26:42 PM · #13 | 
		| | It seems kind of superfluous to say that the 50mm 1.8 is a must buy lens but I will say it anyway.  It is a great lens if you want to do any available light photography indoors. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 01/19/2005 08:48:03 PM · #14 | 
		| | I received the 50mm 1.8 lens for Christmas, I too have not removed it from my camera since then. I love it for portrait work and general around the house stock shots. But, I brought it on a recent snowshoe trip in Yosemite and was disapointed with the photos, seems a zoom when you are out and about is a good thing.
 Now I need a good zoom to replace my kit lens that is affordable, I wonder if it's even worth replacing without spending too much money.
 | 
 | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 10/31/2025 03:50:39 PM EDT.