Author | Thread |
|
01/03/2005 12:52:08 AM · #1 |
Okay, these were shot at weddings last week, so they don't qualify. And I don't have any weddings this week, so I can't shoot anything similar. But see what you think of these...
- - 
|
|
|
01/03/2005 01:01:43 AM · #2 |
I just looked in on the "Bokeh - Duh" thread... for what it's worth, I think mine better fit the challenge than the samples posted thus far.
The samples I'm seeing are simply blurring the background. Sure ... a blurred background allows you to focus on the subject. But how about a little more emphasis on the challenge which states "take a photograph whose subject is enhanced by the bokeh of the background".
To me, that meant the background needs to add meaning to the photo. Simply bluring the background doesn't do that... but in the pictures I posted the blurred background gives meaning to an otherwise boring foreground.
Just my 2 cents for the challenge...
Message edited by author 2005-01-03 01:02:33.
|
|
|
01/03/2005 01:03:21 AM · #3 |
I think #2 is a good example. IMO
|
|
|
01/03/2005 01:04:23 AM · #4 |
Yes, #2 is a good example, and I agree with your interpretation of the challenge. |
|
|
01/03/2005 01:05:52 AM · #5 |
I agree with you. I think, ideally, bokeh should provide juxtaposition to the foreground to form a "multi-voice composition" (if I can borrow a musical term here)
--Lev |
|
|
01/03/2005 01:07:28 AM · #6 |
I actually like #3 most, the group in the background really tells the story. |
|
|
01/03/2005 01:08:28 AM · #7 |
I think #3 fits best in this challenge. The second has a OOF background but no real bokeh character. |
|
|
01/03/2005 01:10:45 AM · #8 |
How are these bokeh? Interesting or not?

|
|
|
01/03/2005 01:14:47 AM · #9 |
I agree with the interpretation of the challenge below. Yes, all the pictures have enhanced quality because of the shallow DOF. The are actually good pictures...without reference to the challenge of "bokeh".
I have one of my personal favorites in my portfolio that I feel represents the challenge as well. It did quite below my expectation in the challenge (because of not meeting the theme) but i believe it is one of my best shots ever. This was taken in Luang Prabang, Laos.
 |
|
|
01/03/2005 01:17:29 AM · #10 |
Don't want to cross-post my thumb here, but do you think my shot in the other thread is a good example for the challenge, or just a shallow DoF shot.
Thanks,
Ara
|
|
|
01/03/2005 01:18:34 AM · #11 |
Originally posted by bruchen: How are these bokeh? Interesting or not?
|
I like your shot... I think yours does a better job of illustrating what *I* always thought bokeh meant. To me, bokeh was how the out of focus points of light would be shaped by the lens. You can see that in your photo whereas mine simply blur the background. (without points of light it's difficult to see the patterns that the lens puts into your photo without you knowing it)
You'll see even more of this if you stop way down ... such as f/22. On some images you see a beautiful star pattern to the points of light in the image. And that's what I thought bokeh meant.
Maybe I was wrong... anyone else want to chime in?
|
|
|
01/03/2005 01:24:06 AM · #12 |
Here is an example of bokeh (almost) without any foreground
 |
|
|
01/03/2005 01:24:23 AM · #13 |
Originally posted by librodo: I have one of my personal favorites in my portfolio that I feel represents the challenge as well. It did quite below my expectation in the challenge (because of not meeting the theme) but i believe it is one of my best shots ever. This was taken in Luang Prabang, Laos.
|
Wow, I love that shot! It went straight to my favorites... :-)
I dunno, maybe you were right about it not fitting the theme of challenge (it was entered in) so well, but the image itself is outstanding.
Message edited by author 2005-01-03 01:29:40.
|
|
|
01/03/2005 01:27:56 AM · #14 |
Originally posted by BikeRacer: Don't want to cross-post my thumb here, but do you think my shot in the other thread is a good example for the challenge, or just a shallow DoF shot. |
Okay, I'll do it. :-)
For me, your image works well. If it was just the toothbrush, it would have less meaning. The blurred background adds to the meaning of the photo.
|
|
|
01/03/2005 01:32:35 AM · #15 |
Originally posted by dwterry: Originally posted by BikeRacer: Don't want to cross-post my thumb here, but do you think my shot in the other thread is a good example for the challenge, or just a shallow DoF shot. |
Okay, I'll do it. :-)
For me, your image works well. If it was just the toothbrush, it would have less meaning. The blurred background adds to the meaning of the photo. |
thanks - i was trying for a dual meaning there. something like the background being soft and "dirty" with the brush being all crisp and "clean" - but enough thread-jacking. :)
I like your second image best also. I think the softness helps compliment the feelings the bride and groom would like to remember (even if the day itself is just a blur) (pun intended)
2nd edit - not used to GFs laptop and hitting its touchpad while typing...
Message edited by author 2005-01-03 01:37:57.
|
|
|
01/03/2005 01:33:36 AM · #16 |
Originally posted by dwterry:
I like your shot... I think yours does a better job of illustrating what *I* always thought bokeh meant. To me, bokeh was how the out of focus points of light would be shaped by the lens. You can see that in your photo whereas mine simply blur the background. (without points of light it's difficult to see the patterns that the lens puts into your photo without you knowing it)
You'll see even more of this if you stop way down ... such as f/22. On some images you see a beautiful star pattern to the points of light in the image. And that's what I thought bokeh meant.
Maybe I was wrong... anyone else want to chime in? |
Thanks David...
Some useful info on bokeh from this site that I googled.
|
|
|
01/03/2005 01:35:31 AM · #17 |
Originally posted by ltsimring: Here is an example of bokeh (almost) without any foreground
|
Hey, I was there just a couple of months ago... :-)
By the way, I took a look at your portfolio (went to see if you had more pictures of Brazil). I love your Ipanema Beach photo. Parabens!
|
|
|
01/03/2005 01:49:50 AM · #18 |
dwterry, i think that your 3rd shot there has the most Bokeh aspects to it as the candle is brought to a diffrent place(brought into a diffrent light if u will) by the out of focus nature of the backround u can tell it is a wedding and so the candle becomes more that just a candle on a table it weaves its way into a bigger fealing and 1 can begin to place the sceen in their mind.
but overall the shots u put up don't really have all the aspects and composer i think the winning shot will need.
the other 2 miss the deffinition compleatly.(IMO)
_brando_
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/07/2025 05:38:09 PM EDT.