DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Tips, Tricks, and Q&A >> Throw away photos - general curiosity
Pages:  
Showing posts 26 - 41 of 41, (reverse)
AuthorThread
11/20/2004 05:34:55 PM · #26
well, i guess that's the end goal.

and i see that as a fairly important skill.
it likely makes for less frustration - say after returning from a trip where you 'think' you shot 250 photos...

how would shoot if you were using film?

11/20/2004 06:26:43 PM · #27
I wasn't to conservative there either.
I just was relaxing and thinking about this. Your goal is good because you want to become better.
But let's say that every picture you took from now on was a keeper. Pretty soon you would have thousands upon thousands of pictures. Now. What is the purpose of those pictures? What is their value to you or to the world? That is what I think about when I delete mine. It's not that they aren't up to par. If I was using photography to document my life or doing something more important, I would want to keep more. But I do it mostly to amuse myself. I never get to frustrated because I do look at and evaluate most of my pictures on my computer. I would never assume that I had 250 good shots by just looking at the lcd display.
11/20/2004 06:51:04 PM · #28
Originally posted by pcody:

But I can see how it would be easy to want to keep everything. Some of you might become famous someday and will need all those pictures to sell, or at least to show your progress.

But Andy Warhol promised!

The trick will be to find them in 15 minutes ...
11/20/2004 07:02:30 PM · #29
wouldn't it be nice if you did?

Originally posted by pcody:

I would never assume that I had 250 good shots by just looking at the lcd display.


if every photo i took was a keeper - they would all be archived.
the purpose of my photos is to capture a thought of mine, or a moment in time viewed through my eyes. hopefully they are pleasing to a viewer, or have some emotion or meaning attached to them. ( for others )

if they are/become valuable - BONUS

Message edited by author 2004-11-20 19:03:04.
11/20/2004 07:07:04 PM · #30
Paul. It's only 15 seconds. How ever will you show all those thousands of pictures in that short of time?
Sorry: it was 15 minutes?

Message edited by author 2004-11-20 19:18:28.
11/20/2004 07:18:02 PM · #31
I guess what I'm saying about keeping them all is eventually, because the mass of the pictures will grow, each one will become less valuable to you. Even if they do show your life in minute detail, you will not have time to enjoy them. I want to look back and see moments where I discovered something new and moments that I think are a sum of what my life was like at a particular moment. I don't want to get bogged down in all the details of life by having to look at a 100 photos when there could be just one I can look at and recall everything before or after it was taken.
11/20/2004 07:51:57 PM · #32
Originally posted by pcody:

Paul. It's only 15 seconds. How ever will you show all those thousands of pictures in that short of time?
Sorry: it was 15 minutes?

"In the future everyone will be famous for fifteen minutes."
Andy Warhol (1928 - 1987)
11/20/2004 07:54:57 PM · #33
those are the 1-2% that get printed... ;}

Originally posted by pcody:

I guess what I'm saying about keeping them all is eventually, because the mass of the pictures will grow, each one will become less valuable to you. Even if they do show your life in minute detail, you will not have time to enjoy them. I want to look back and see moments where I discovered something new and moments that I think are a sum of what my life was like at a particular moment. I don't want to get bogged down in all the details of life by having to look at a 100 photos when there could be just one I can look at and recall everything before or after it was taken.

11/20/2004 07:55:55 PM · #34
Originally posted by soup:

those are the 1-2% that get printed... ;}

Originally posted by pcody:

I guess what I'm saying about keeping them all is eventually, because the mass of the pictures will grow, each one will become less valuable to you. Even if they do show your life in minute detail, you will not have time to enjoy them. I want to look back and see moments where I discovered something new and moments that I think are a sum of what my life was like at a particular moment. I don't want to get bogged down in all the details of life by having to look at a 100 photos when there could be just one I can look at and recall everything before or after it was taken.

Or still on the hard drive in the "Edited" folder : )
11/20/2004 08:05:39 PM · #35
Now that you have said that 2% will actually mean something to you, lets go back to the original question. Why are you keeping the 98% that will mean nothing to you in a year?
I think I have gone on to long with this thread. Like I said before, I don't like holding onto things. That's why I delete most of my pictures. The ones I think will have value for me for the future, I keep.
11/20/2004 08:11:34 PM · #36
because you never know what will mean something to someone else....

that's what photography is all about...

Message edited by author 2004-11-20 20:12:23.
11/20/2004 09:49:15 PM · #37
"In the future everyone will be famous for fifteen minutes."
Andy Warhol (1928 - 1987) [/quote]

Realizing that I may have had my 15 min about 25 yrs ago, I'm trying to prove Andy wrong.
11/20/2004 10:02:43 PM · #38
Originally posted by moodville:


I typically toss about 80% of my images these days. 10% I keep as something I may want to play with in the future (I have a habit of liking things I dont immediately like after a month or so), 9% I'll upload to the web, and 1% I'll print.

Which boils down to 'I suck!' :)


This sounds about right for me ... and if she sucks, I should give up altogether :)
11/20/2004 10:47:00 PM · #39
Originally posted by moodville:

I trash any shot that is blurry, wrong exposure, distracting elements, bad composition, ... and anything that I think just wouldnt be useable.

I trash a lot because I find going through (many) poor images at a later date to find one good image to be totally frustrating. I would rather search through 100 good images and have a varied choice to pick from.


My procedure and reason - exactly.
I think I toss about 20% after the first look. The rest go to (duplicate) CDs, cataloged with Photoshop Album.
11/20/2004 11:20:12 PM · #40
Lately I trash only the near duplicates, very bad blurs or the seriously underexposed experiments.

Everythng else I keep to remind me that I once thought that subject was worth archiving and that I should really go back for further study and clicking when I know I can take more time with it.
11/20/2004 11:25:49 PM · #41
I only throw away the absolutely ruined shots. Camera shake, and other things or duplicates. Reason being, I used to throw away a good bit, then I'd be kicking myself in the butt a while later when I think back of a shot I took and realize I threw it away if I want to mess with it in photoshop or whatever. For example, if I see a nice tutorial in a magazine, and I think of an image of mine that would be good for it, I go grab it and follow along. :D
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 09/16/2025 04:26:42 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/16/2025 04:26:42 PM EDT.