| Author | Thread |
|
|
09/29/2004 08:42:21 AM · #26 |
Originally posted by lenkphotos:
Originally posted by notonline:
if you open a beer, drink a beer then pee which part would you photograph??? Just think outside the box... or inside the box... or at least a part of the box. |
I'd use Tv mode to set the shutter speed at 1/2000 to get a stopped-motion shot of the pee, ...and then crop to one/two drops, which would be part of the pee, right?? |
sounds like whole drops to me, clearly you could not be bother to read the challenge - 1 ;)
|
|
|
|
09/29/2004 08:43:22 AM · #27 |
| This is getting weird now. Back to work. |
|
|
|
09/29/2004 08:55:31 AM · #28 |
Originally posted by Pug-H:
Originally posted by xion:
I don't seem to find the box. |
The box has been broken up into parts and scattered. |
Soooooo..... just take a picture of part of the box.
|
|
|
|
09/29/2004 09:08:37 AM · #29 |
I wonder if that part could be privat? So a photo of someones private part, would be only a part of the whole self, meaning you could photo the entire privat part!! ohhh, i've gone crosseyed.!!
|
|
|
|
09/29/2004 09:16:01 AM · #30 |
| OMG - this thread has completely made my morning. you people are insane, and I love each and everyone of you. Well, part of each and everyone of your parts. |
|
|
|
09/29/2004 09:19:08 AM · #31 |
Originally posted by atsxus:
OMG - this thread has completely made my morning. you people are insane, and I love each and everyone of you. Well, part of each and everyone of your parts. |
It's great to be loved - even if it's partially.
|
|
|
|
09/29/2004 09:21:36 AM · #32 |
| yeah, sum of my parts are greater than the whole of me. |
|
|
|
09/29/2004 09:45:28 AM · #33 |
I hope I know which parts you love. other parts don't even fit and should not be where they are.
|
|
|
|
09/29/2004 09:46:37 AM · #34 |
Originally posted by jmsetzler:
What if I photograph a whole part of something? Should I only photograph part of the part or the whole part or part of the whole? |
hmmmm... Let's see here. It would probably be better to photograph a part of the part rather than the entire part. Someone might consider your entire part the entire subject, which in turn would be a direct violation of the challenge, which is "photographing a part of the subject". And don't forget, "be creative with your angle". Hence a straight on shot or other common angle will not meet the challenge. And finally, "be creative with your approach". I take this to mean that your set-up should be unique. Hence a shot of water on glass over a flag, or a glass appearing to have different colored liquids in it would not be a unique approach, and thus not meet the challenge. Of course if I am mistaken, feel free to correct me as I hate being pickey... 
|
|
|
|
09/29/2004 10:24:18 AM · #35 |
| Is it okay to take a picture of part of a zoo? |
|
|
|
09/29/2004 10:28:50 AM · #36 |
Originally posted by thatcloudthere:
Is it okay to take a picture of part of a zoo? |
How about part of the world? Now I'm getting silly. :D
|
|
|
|
09/29/2004 10:54:59 AM · #37 |
Originally posted by Arnarp:
I hope I know which parts you love. other parts don't even fit and should not be where they are. |
Ok - that's just disturbing. But that's why I like it! |
|
|
|
09/29/2004 11:34:51 AM · #38 |
Apart from parting from a holistic approach to the subject, what, specifically, would impart more than a marginal sense of a thing, an object (as compared to a thing)? A completeness? Alas, when is one so?
An impartial opinion? Amuse me, I am wholly split already. But to scatter an egg or a sphere...
Message edited by author 2004-09-29 11:39:34.
|
|
|
|
09/29/2004 12:25:27 PM · #39 |
Originally posted by zeuszen:
Apart from parting from a holistic approach to the subject, what, specifically, would impart more than a marginal sense of a thing, an object (as compared to a thing)? A completeness? Alas, when is one so?
An impartial opinion? Amuse me, I am wholly split already. But to scatter an egg or a sphere... |
Anything, no matter how big, is still part of a larger whole. |
|
|
|
09/29/2004 12:26:27 PM · #40 |
Originally posted by zeuszen:
Apart from parting from a holistic approach to the subject, what, specifically, would impart more than a marginal sense of a thing, an object (as compared to a thing)? A completeness? Alas, when is one so?
An impartial opinion? Amuse me, I am wholly split already. But to scatter an egg or a sphere... |
yes
|
|
|
|
09/29/2004 12:27:24 PM · #41 |
Originally posted by zeuszen:
Apart from parting from a holistic approach to the subject, what, specifically, would impart more than a marginal sense of a thing, an object (as compared to a thing)? A completeness? Alas, when is one so?
An impartial opinion? Amuse me, I am wholly split already. But to scatter an egg or a sphere... |
...absolutely. |
|
|
|
09/29/2004 12:28:32 PM · #42 |
Originally posted by zeuszen:
Apart from parting from a holistic approach to the subject, what, specifically, would impart more than a marginal sense of a thing, an object (as compared to a thing)? A completeness? Alas, when is one so?
An impartial opinion? Amuse me, I am wholly split already. But to scatter an egg or a sphere... |
couldn't agree more |
|
|
|
09/29/2004 12:34:24 PM · #43 |
yup. full on, dude.
Originally posted by zeuszen:
Apart from parting from a holistic approach to the subject, what, specifically, would impart more than a marginal sense of a thing, an object (as compared to a thing)? A completeness? Alas, when is one so?
An impartial opinion? Amuse me, I am wholly split already. But to scatter an egg or a sphere... |
|
|
|
|
09/29/2004 12:36:53 PM · #44 |
Originally posted by zeuszen:
Apart from parting from a holistic approach to the subject, what, specifically, would impart more than a marginal sense of a thing, an object (as compared to a thing)? A completeness? Alas, when is one so?
An impartial opinion? Amuse me, I am wholly split already. But to scatter an egg or a sphere... |
This one makes even less sense than most! |
|
|
|
09/29/2004 12:59:47 PM · #45 |
Originally posted by zeuszen:
Amuse me, I am wholly split already. |
But, it is you who amuses us, my sides have split. |
|
|
|
09/29/2004 01:32:28 PM · #46 |
| So.....if a "part" is small, you could use a macro lens to enhance the "part" in order to help it fill the frame or provide a unique view. Correct ? |
|
|
|
09/29/2004 01:33:50 PM · #47 |
Originally posted by Resusit8u:
So.....if a "part" is small, you could use a macro lens to enhance the "part" in order to help it fill the frame or provide a unique view. Correct ? |
Exactly......
|
|
|
|
09/29/2004 01:44:51 PM · #48 |
Originally posted by Resusit8u:
So.....if a "part" is small, you could use a macro lens to enhance the "part" in order to help it fill the frame or provide a unique view. Correct ? |
Even if the part is large, you can do the same thing.
All technical/logistical considerations aside, you could take a picture of the solar system from beyond the orbit of Pluto and say that is "part" of the Milky Way Galaxy. You could also take a picture of the Galaxy and say that it is "part" of the Universe. |
|
|
|
09/29/2004 01:54:01 PM · #49 |
Even if the part is large, you can do the same thing.
Not necessarily, size counts...if the "part" is large you would need a wide angle lens where as if it is small it would require a macro.
:) |
|
|
|
09/29/2004 01:58:57 PM · #50 |
Originally posted by colda:
...the 'anything' that is 'something', is it a part of something, a part of anything, a part of everything or a whole of something/anything/everything? |
OK, I'm lost... who's on first?
Deciding on an appropriate subject is part of the challenge (I was really hoping to avoid that word). While any object may be construed as part (dang!) of a larger whole, showing the whole object would be scoring suicide. If you can't decide whether or not your image portrays a piece (heh, heh) of something, just ask a partner.. (doh!) |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 11/04/2025 03:09:41 AM EST.
