| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/16/2005 01:13:16 AM · #26 |
Originally posted by sfboatright:
So we've established that you can take a picture of anyone in a public place, but you can't use it "commercially."
So what do you do with the public people pics you take? Suggestions? |
TO share them with other photo nuts unlike ourselves. Simply for enjoyment of captureing a moment in time. As well, it's challenging. |
|
|
|
02/16/2005 01:21:54 AM · #27 |
|
|
|
02/16/2005 01:35:07 AM · #28 |
yeah...I have a couple like that...
 |
|
|
|
02/16/2005 01:50:43 AM · #29 |
Originally posted by sfboatright:
So we've established that you can take a picture of anyone in a public place, but you can't use it "commercially."
So what do you do with the public people pics you take? Suggestions? |
When they say you can use them commercially, that means you can't sell it for use in an ad etc.
You CAN sell that printed image as art.
You CAN use it editorially (i.e. sell it to your local paper or other media agency (AP, Reuters etc.) for that use) if it's newsworthy.
|
|
|
|
02/16/2005 10:17:17 AM · #30 |
Originally posted by capgal:
otherwise he has a HUGE lawsuit to file....
Just my 2 cents... |
What lawsuit would that be? Wisconsin has no laws against at-will employment, so as long as they are not violated federal laws(i.e. fired because of ethnicity, religion, sex, any of those discriminatory type situations) or a contract clause they don't have to have a reason to fire him.
Message edited by author 2005-02-16 10:18:15. |
|
|
|
02/16/2005 05:35:24 PM · #31 |
Originally posted by deapee:
Legally speaking...anything or anybody viewable from a public place is perfectly fine to take a picture of. |
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Then perhaps you could have added strategic emphasis, so as to avoid any possible mistaken implication someone might logically draw from your statment |
No need. Read it just as I typed it and you won't have any problem understanding EXACTLY what it was that I said.
|
|
|
|
02/16/2005 07:10:12 PM · #32 |
Originally posted by colema19:
Originally posted by capgal:
otherwise he has a HUGE lawsuit to file....
Just my 2 cents... |
What lawsuit would that be? Wisconsin has no laws against at-will employment, so as long as they are not violated federal laws(i.e. fired because of ethnicity, religion ... |
You're saying Bud's not a religion? : )
That'll be news to the NFL.
deapee: you may well be perfectly correct. My only further "argument" might be that, given that I apparently misunderstood/misinterpreted what you said, it's not implausible that one less-versed in the verbal arts and legal precision than I am might have similarly misunderstood your position. I don't think anything I've posted contradicts anything you said, but only added/elaborated on the original. I apologize if it seemed otherwise.
Message edited by author 2005-02-16 19:12:18. |
|
|
|
02/16/2005 07:28:23 PM · #33 |
Originally posted by GeneralE:
deapee: you may well be perfectly correct. My only further "argument" might be that, given that I apparently misunderstood/misinterpreted what you said, it's not implausible that one less-versed in the verbal arts and legal precision than I am might have similarly misunderstood your position. |
I'm not sure what makes your verbal skills better than anyone else's, and I'm not sure why you misunderstood/misinterpreted what I said. It was and still is pretty clear by my definitions.
Legally speaking...anything or anybody viewable from a public place is perfectly fine to take a picture of.
Which part is misleading or which part did you have a hard time interpreting or understanding?
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/14/2025 10:40:43 AM EDT.
