| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/27/2012 05:57:27 PM · #1 |
|
|
|
01/29/2012 01:17:06 AM · #2 |
What the hell is he talking about? Maybe some prerequisite examples will help.
Mannerism:
Pontormo
-
Neo-mannerism:
Ernie Barnes (More images)
-
Photoneomannerism:
Photography in the style of the second example: Elongated figures, exaggerated poses, rapturous expressions, a graceful sort of energy, and color -- lots of color. Yeah, I came up with the term on my own. There are references to "photomannerism" but none to "photoneomannerism." Well, until now.
Candid or set-up. (I prefer candid, of course.) Minimal or expert.
|
|
|
|
01/29/2012 01:28:42 AM · #3 |
This would certainly qualify:
 |
|
|
|
01/29/2012 03:04:15 AM · #4 |
|
|
|
01/29/2012 03:07:18 AM · #5 |
| I want this challenge topic. Not least for the fun of reading the 'WTF?' thread that would surely follow the official challenge announcement. You are a wicked fellow. |
|
|
|
01/29/2012 11:07:29 AM · #6 |
Originally posted by ubique:
I want this challenge topic. Not least for the fun of reading the 'WTF?' thread that would surely follow the official challenge announcement. You are a wicked fellow. |
I just might start that thread myself! It sounds intriguing, but also has me scratching my head to try and figure out how to do a photograph that suits it.
|
|
|
|
01/29/2012 03:45:21 PM · #7 |
| Spent a lot of time looking at Ernie Barnes' work. |
|
|
|
01/29/2012 05:14:39 PM · #8 |
| Candid? That would be impressive based on the examples given. Naturally the salted wounds are your suggested rulesets, but I hope this makes the cut. |
|
|
|
01/29/2012 05:46:53 PM · #9 |
Photography in the style of the second example: Elongated figures, exaggerated poses, rapturous expressions, a graceful sort of energy, and color -- lots of color. Yeah, I came up with the term on my own. There are references to "photomannerism" but none to "photoneomannerism." Well, until now
Wouldn't that be what one sees in Vogue, Elle, Victoria's Secret, etc? Fashion Photoshopography...? XD |
|
|
|
01/29/2012 05:54:24 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by bvy:
This would certainly qualify:
|
as long as it's not a challenge of recreated paintings. |
|
|
|
02/03/2012 08:44:36 PM · #11 |
Yes to bemusing the DPC community. No to restaging existing works of art. Yes to Ernie Barnes (dy-no-mite). No to Vogue. DX to you too.
Candids can work. A wide angle, novel point of view -- even creative use of blur -- can go a long way to enhance or elongate human forms. This is photography; women with eight foot long arms are hard to come by. But we can fake it.
|
|
|
|
02/03/2012 09:10:23 PM · #12 |
| creative/artistic distort. |
|
|
|
02/03/2012 09:20:05 PM · #13 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/27/2025 03:35:00 PM EDT.
