DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Challenge Results >> My first Brown, YAY :-(
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 18 of 18, (reverse)
AuthorThread
09/19/2011 06:00:21 AM · #1
Well, I don't know what to say... I didn't think it would be understood, but Damn...



This actually took a lot of time and I was pretty sure no one else would do it. I think if my processing skills were better it would have done...well, better...
I took a fake sunflower apart, cut out the center, and glued it back together. I then spray painted it the "negative" of all of its colors (yellow petals were painted blue, green stem was painted purple. Then I put up a cardboard box (tan's neg is blueish) with a hole in it (and a blue gel over it). Lined up the sun, with the hole in the box, the hole in the flower and my camera and "let her rip". In Post processing I inverted the hole image, cleaned it up and got this.

The black dot in the center of the flower is actually the sun..
09/19/2011 08:22:21 AM · #2
You are right in that I didn't 'get it', but damn, you deserve extra points for the effort and creativity.
09/19/2011 09:05:28 AM · #3
A for effort at least.
09/19/2011 09:11:25 AM · #4
If you could have put that whole description in the 'title' field, you might have done better. Unfortunately when voting people don't always know the pain you went to to get the shot, they vote on what they see.
09/19/2011 09:12:01 AM · #5
I've had one of my own that I put a lot of effort into only to reap a sub-5 as a reward. What really hurt about it is the comment that said it was clear I put no effort into it. Then I've had lazy shots that ribboned. Effort does not always correspond to a high score. All that matters is results.
09/19/2011 09:29:09 AM · #6
Originally posted by Yo_Spiff:

I've had one of my own that I put a lot of effort into only to reap a sub-5 as a reward. What really hurt about it is the comment that said it was clear I put no effort into it. Then I've had lazy shots that ribboned. Effort does not always correspond to a high score. All that matters is results.


+1
And I will add that putting tags in the title to try to convey the effort usually are not well received. If you start to get the feeling that you have to explain yourself in the title, that should be a big red flag.
09/19/2011 09:41:38 AM · #7
Originally posted by JH:

If you could have put that whole description in the 'title' field, you might have done better. Unfortunately when voting people don't always know the pain you went to to get the shot, they vote on what they see.


Originally posted by kirbic:

Originally posted by Yo_Spiff:

I've had one of my own that I put a lot of effort into only to reap a sub-5 as a reward. What really hurt about it is the comment that said it was clear I put no effort into it. Then I've had lazy shots that ribboned. Effort does not always correspond to a high score. All that matters is results.


+1
And I will add that putting tags in the title to try to convey the effort usually are not well received. If you start to get the feeling that you have to explain yourself in the title, that should be a big red flag.


Refer to this little experiment that i did a while back :-)
09/21/2011 03:41:41 PM · #8
Originally posted by sinistral_leo:

Well, I don't know what to say... I didn't think it would be understood, but Damn...



This actually took a lot of time and I was pretty sure no one else would do it. I think if my processing skills were better it would have done...well, better...
I took a fake sunflower apart, cut out the center, and glued it back together. I then spray painted it the "negative" of all of its colors (yellow petals were painted blue, green stem was painted purple. Then I put up a cardboard box (tan's neg is blueish) with a hole in it (and a blue gel over it). Lined up the sun, with the hole in the box, the hole in the flower and my camera and "let her rip". In Post processing I inverted the hole image, cleaned it up and got this.

The black dot in the center of the flower is actually the sun..


Kind of like solarizing. When I saw it, I approved. Thought it would hit dead last.
09/21/2011 03:52:53 PM · #9
Agreed with Bohemka - "...Unfortunately it was lost on voters in a simple photography competition, but that's to be expected when the greater context is unknown..."
09/21/2011 03:59:00 PM · #10
Thedruid, sorry, I don't understand your reply. I understand solarizing, but not the approval part.

Message edited by author 2011-09-21 16:44:33.
09/21/2011 04:42:04 PM · #11
congratulations

or


Message edited by author 2011-09-21 16:51:46.
09/21/2011 05:19:28 PM · #12
Originally posted by sinistral_leo:

Thedruid, sorry, I don't understand your reply. I understand solarizing, but not the approval part.

I also "approve" of (appreciate?) what you did, and especially your detailed description of how you did it. Someday "someone" somewhere will remember that you can build a set-up in "negative" colors to create an image with a black sun, and make some new art.

However, if asked, I would have also predicted a low score in a DPC challenge, partly because of the degree of posterization (akin to solarization) and blur detracting from the photo-realistic quality, partly because people don't know and can't appreciate how it was done, and partly because I tried for a somewhat similar effect (but using a vastly different technique) in a recent challenge, and it was not that well-received.

09/21/2011 06:04:35 PM · #13
Originally posted by GeneralE:

Originally posted by sinistral_leo:

Thedruid, sorry, I don't understand your reply. I understand solarizing, but not the approval part.

I also "approve" of (appreciate?) what you did, and especially your detailed description of how you did it. Someday "someone" somewhere will remember that you can build a set-up in "negative" colors to create an image with a black sun, and make some new art.

However, if asked, I would have also predicted a low score in a DPC challenge, partly because of the degree of posterization (akin to solarization) and blur detracting from the photo-realistic quality, partly because people don't know and can't appreciate how it was done, and partly because I tried for a somewhat similar effect (but using a vastly different technique) in a recent challenge, and it was not that well-received.



I commented on your image and voted and 8. I guess it is my style.

09/21/2011 06:05:15 PM · #14
Originally posted by raish:

congratulations


Sweet! I like the "negative" one!!
09/21/2011 07:52:01 PM · #15
Originally posted by sinistral_leo:

I commented on your image and voted and 8. I guess it is my style.

:-)

BTW, if you are short of Brown ribbons, I'd be happy to lend you a few ... ;-)
09/21/2011 07:56:17 PM · #16
JMRitz has a whole collection 21 Brown Ribbons from this year alone.
Not a bad thing at all.
09/21/2011 08:13:22 PM · #17
Hey, I've got some browns, and I don't think of them as *brown* in a nasty sense.

I think of them as chocolate.

Chocolate ribbons, which maybe uhm got left out in the sun and hence a little runny, but that doesn't change the fact that they're still CHOCOLATE!!!!

And I guess whiterook better look to his laurels, JMRitz does seem to be on fire...
09/21/2011 09:46:44 PM · #18
Originally posted by snaffles:

Chocolate ribbons, which maybe uhm got left out in the sun and hence a little runny, but that doesn't change the fact that they're still CHOCOLATE!!!!

Yes, I approve of chocolate ...
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 08/03/2025 03:37:11 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/03/2025 03:37:11 AM EDT.