| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/11/2011 12:03:57 PM · #26 |
Originally posted by gcoulson:
Haven't quite figured out what Google+ offers over Facebook. |
Quite simple really.
Message edited by author 2011-07-11 12:04:11.
|
|
|
|
07/11/2011 12:51:46 PM · #27 |
I would like to join:
I'm here
Thanks! |
|
|
|
07/11/2011 01:27:55 PM · #28 |
Originally posted by NiallOTuama:
Originally posted by gcoulson:
Haven't quite figured out what Google+ offers over Facebook. |
Quite simple really.
|
Funny, but the real beauty is, even when they are, you don't have to share with them! |
|
|
|
07/11/2011 01:42:54 PM · #29 |
| I'm on as Johanna Siegmann. No idea even where that link IS. I'm so hopeless with this stuff. But for sure won't be using it to post photos. Just info. |
|
|
|
07/11/2011 02:39:22 PM · #30 |
I'd join if somebody added me- here----------> Blindjustice-pauledaddario at google+
I guess I found a bunch and added people to my own DPchallenge circle. I admittedly don't know how exactly info is shared on G+, but...
Message edited by author 2011-07-11 15:21:36. |
|
|
|
07/11/2011 03:24:25 PM · #31 |
Originally posted by NiallOTuama:
Originally posted by gcoulson:
Haven't quite figured out what Google+ offers over Facebook. |
Quite simple really.
|
Shouldn't that read 'Your kids aren't here yet'?? ;)
|
|
|
|
07/11/2011 03:45:09 PM · #32 |
Originally posted by gcoulson:
Haven't quite figured out what Google+ offers over Facebook. |
XKCD |
|
|
|
07/11/2011 04:52:43 PM · #33 |
i would need an invitation if someone has a spare one :-)
THX.
|
|
|
|
07/11/2011 04:58:29 PM · #34 |
| Im in if somebody will invite me. |
|
|
|
07/11/2011 05:44:04 PM · #35 |
- Chris - Sent you an invite on the email in your profile.
- Goran - I need an email to send an invite... just PM me and will be on it's way. |
|
|
|
07/12/2011 12:10:34 AM · #36 |
|
|
|
07/12/2011 01:01:13 AM · #37 |
| I'm new to DPC so I can't say I actually know any of you, but it's always nice to have people to share photos with! I can be found here |
|
|
|
07/12/2011 09:19:09 AM · #38 |
I only check in on FB a couple of times a week, so I don't expect I would sign up for Google's service unless everyone abandons FB, leaving it a wasteland like MySpace now is. At any rate, I ran into this article on Migrating your information from Facebook to Google+. Thought it would be useful.
|
|
|
|
07/12/2011 10:31:05 AM · #39 |
|
|
|
07/12/2011 10:57:29 AM · #40 |
|
|
|
07/12/2011 11:13:32 AM · #41 |
Got 20 of ye in my circle now.
|
|
|
|
07/12/2011 11:23:20 AM · #42 |
//gplus.to/nrshapiro
Message edited by author 2011-07-12 11:23:26. |
|
|
|
07/12/2011 11:26:33 AM · #43 |
| May I have an invite, please |
|
|
|
07/12/2011 11:28:09 AM · #44 |
Originally posted by dsterner:
May I have an invite, please |
sending now:p
|
|
|
|
07/12/2011 11:34:27 AM · #45 |
Originally posted by nB:
Originally posted by dsterner:
May I have an invite, please |
sending now:p |
Thank you |
|
|
|
07/12/2011 12:02:38 PM · #46 |
www.gplus.to/markwiley
I am in. Not sure where I am going.
|
|
|
|
07/12/2011 12:17:21 PM · #47 |
Interesting article from the Washington Post warning photographers about the terms for photos on Google+
From the Google+ TOS
By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services.
You agree that this license includes a right for Google to make such Content available to other companies, organizations or individuals with whom Google has relationships for the provision of syndicated services, and to use such Content in connection with the provision of those services.
You understand that Google, in performing the required technical steps to provide the Services to our users, may (a) transmit or distribute your Content over various public networks and in various media; and (b) make such changes to your Content as are necessary to conform and adapt that Content to the technical requirements of connecting networks, devices, services or media. You agree that this license shall permit Google to take these actions.
Be careful out there!
|
|
|
|
07/12/2011 12:33:34 PM · #48 |
Originally posted by scarbrd:
Interesting article from the Washington Post warning photographers about the terms for photos on Google+
From the Google+ TOS
By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services.
You agree that this license includes a right for Google to make such Content available to other companies, organizations or individuals with whom Google has relationships for the provision of syndicated services, and to use such Content in connection with the provision of those services.
You understand that Google, in performing the required technical steps to provide the Services to our users, may (a) transmit or distribute your Content over various public networks and in various media; and (b) make such changes to your Content as are necessary to conform and adapt that Content to the technical requirements of connecting networks, devices, services or media. You agree that this license shall permit Google to take these actions.
Be careful out there! |
You know, DPC has a very similar TOS. I recall someone recently freaking out about sending in a RAW for validation because they were convinced that Langdon and his minions were going to print it as posters and sell hundreds of thousands of copies...
I see this as pretty much the same thing - effectively they have this in their TOS so they can deliver your photos to whatever device and in whatever format... I'm pretty sure Google isn't going to open themselves up to any sort of litigation over a simple photo - as sure as I am that they won't print your images up as thousands of posters and sell them for a profit - remember, Google is not in the poster business, they do have a fairly diverse business plan, but I'm confident that fine art prints are not yet in their sights.
Relax - that's not in the TOS so they can steal your crap, it's just there to protect them for normal activities that will require changing and distributing the content. |
|
|
|
07/12/2011 01:00:03 PM · #49 |
Originally posted by Cory:
You know, DPC has a very similar TOS. I recall someone recently freaking out about sending in a RAW for validation because they were convinced that Langdon and his minions were going to print it as posters and sell hundreds of thousands of copies...
I see this as pretty much the same thing - effectively they have this in their TOS so they can deliver your photos to whatever device and in whatever format... I'm pretty sure Google isn't going to open themselves up to any sort of litigation over a simple photo - as sure as I am that they won't print your images up as thousands of posters and sell them for a profit - remember, Google is not in the poster business, they do have a fairly diverse business plan, but I'm confident that fine art prints are not yet in their sights.
Relax - that's not in the TOS so they can steal your crap, it's just there to protect them for normal activities that will require changing and distributing the content. |
What this is saying is that anyone can grab an image off Google+ and use it as they see fit.
This is the clause I take the most issue with
You agree that this license includes a right for Google to make such Content available to other companies, organizations or individuals with whom Google has relationships for the provision of syndicated services, and to use such Content in connection with the provision of those services.
Anyone they have a relationship with is anyone on Google+. Say my syndicated service is a photo stock agency for web sites. By displaying the photos, Google+ plus is providing me with content I can use for my syndicated service. I can sell these images without compensating the originator.
I've refused to sell photos with less restricting language.
This is nothing like the DPC TOS. |
|
|
|
07/12/2011 01:59:33 PM · #50 |
Anyone try deleting images from their Scrapbook?
Let me know how, when you do... |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/01/2025 06:40:44 AM EDT.
