| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/16/2002 01:28:10 PM · #26 |
I'm super broke, too, but somehow I keep buying things for my camera so I'm sure I could come up with a small donation to the site if need be. I figure I'm probably going to sue this site at some point anyway for totally disrupting my life and not allowing me to even think about anything else, well, almost:? )
Tim J
|
|
|
|
07/16/2002 01:33:18 PM · #27 |
i'm not far from broke but i willingly pay $15/y for one membership and $60/y each for 2 other memberships ...i deem these sites worthwhile ...hint hint drew! :o)
|
|
|
|
07/16/2002 01:45:00 PM · #28 |
you may be able to turn that into a class action suit. count me in for that, too! :)
Originally posted by timj351:
I figure I'm probably going to sue this site at some point anyway for totally disrupting my life and not allowing me to even think about anything else, well, almost:? )
Tim J
|
|
|
|
07/16/2002 01:52:27 PM · #29 |
Originally posted by brumos:
This is exactly what i figured may happen with the recent voting rule changes. You can't force people to comment or change the way they comment by introducing new voting requirements. It was working just fine before. It's a huge waste of time!
Brumos,
I don't think this is an artifact of the new submission guidelines, as there has been discussion of these types of comments being left in the past. There is one user in particular who has been known to leave a mostly puzzline one-word comments, but some of her other comments have been constructive. It is unlikely that she is doing this to meep the submission guideline, as she has never posted a photo to a challenge.
-Terry
|
|
|
|
07/16/2002 01:56:19 PM · #30 |
Originally posted by KDJohnson:
Originally posted by karmat:
[i]My husband and I were talking about this last night. Have ya''ll looked into it? I am sure there are several on this site that would be willing to help. I would be. Others?
I''d be willing to help as well. Would rather see a yearly fee though. Perhaps you could keep the site open for everyone but offer a few "perks" for those who choose to pay membership fees? If enough people are willing to contribute I''m not sure that it would cost that much, would it? Just an idea....
K
oops..had to edit...just wanted to be sure that you knew I''d be willing to contribute without "perks" or membership as well. :P
[/i]
Add me to the list on that.... what she said.
-Terry
|
|
|
|
07/16/2002 02:34:57 PM · #31 |
Originally posted by KDJohnson:
Would rather see a yearly fee though.
It definitely should be yearly. It lets the site know that it has the money for the year and lets them get a deal on a contract. It lets the users make one payment and be done with it.
|
|
|
|
07/21/2002 11:17:09 PM · #32 |
We''re all photographer''s right? And most of us take pretty good pictures, right? Is there maybe a way we can sell the photos? (With the photographer''s permission, of course) Maybe we could make people pay $10, $15 or $20 for a one of our photos printed out and framed. If we can find a way to mass produce the pictures and sell them to stores, markets...
...Just a thought...
* This message has been edited by the author on 7/21/2002 11:18:46 PM. |
|
|
|
07/21/2002 11:44:07 PM · #33 |
This has been discussed in a different thread... I think the Admins are working on a partnership or something....
Stay tuned!
|
|
|
|
07/22/2002 12:11:51 AM · #34 |
Originally posted by gr8photos:
you may be able to turn that into a class action suit. count me in for that, too! :)
Originally posted by timj351:
I figure I'm probably going to sue this site at some point anyway for totally disrupting my life and not allowing me to even think about anything else, well, almost:? )
Tim J
can we make that a double-breasted suit?
seriously though with over 200 hotos submitted its going to get slower especially with all of the people voting and stuff.
Does anyone have access to a good co-lo facility? Id think that latency would be more of a problem than system through put?
Maybe set up a tech board in administrative?
Remember all comenters are reveled for what they are when the voting is done. though I dont pay anyattention to the ones that dont make any sense. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/03/2025 10:35:15 AM EDT.
