Author | Thread |
|
02/16/2011 12:40:49 PM · #1 |
A few people have asked how I made that dark, gloomy crow image, so here's a step-by-step for those who are interested. Note that this was a flyby shot, at a full 400mm, of a crow briefly visiting a tree by my driveway. I got two exposures only, then he was gone. They don't like having me around with a "gun", which is what the 400 looks like :-) I went out in the first place 'cuz there were like 100 of these things flocking and wheeling in that tree, so I grabbed the 5D, mounted the gun, and stepped out the front door.
Ill-advisedly, as it happens, since the whole freaking flock decamped instantly, except this one danged bird who was giving me the beady eye: then he left too.
So I had to deal with a fairly extreme crop, and an underexposed image to boot...
*************
Processing steps in each image's details box.
***************
Image as shot, and as processed in ACR:
Iterations of processing in CS3:
Image as submitted:
R. |
|
|
02/16/2011 12:50:28 PM · #2 |
Wow. Thanks! Lots of info to absorb. |
|
|
02/16/2011 12:53:51 PM · #3 |
Congrats on your Blue ribbon. That is a very good extraction of the essence of the scene, with much attention paid to important details and good crop. The color temp change allowed just the right mood. |
|
|
02/16/2011 12:56:22 PM · #4 |
Very, very cool. Thanks for detailing it. Lots to study. |
|
|
02/16/2011 01:03:32 PM · #5 |
Wow! I loved your entry but to be honest if I had taken that shot I would have deleted it because I know there's no way I could ever process it that well. |
|
|
02/16/2011 01:07:54 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by KarenNfld: Wow! I loved your entry but to be honest if I had taken that shot I would have deleted it... |
I nearly did, but I was using the magnifier in Bridge to see how sharp it was (new lens, don'tcha know?) and I realized that crow was casting a baleful glare my way, so I said to myself "You can do something with this!"
R. |
|
|
02/16/2011 01:14:18 PM · #7 |
This is why it is great when people post originals on the site. Thanks a lot, shows how much I need to experiment with photoshop etc. Amazing what you can do with an original like that.
Message edited by author 2011-02-16 13:15:01. |
|
|
02/16/2011 01:16:34 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by KarenNfld: Wow! I loved your entry but to be honest if I had taken that shot I would have deleted it because I know there's no way I could ever process it that well. |
I thought the same thing. I never would have saved that shot. Trash can.
Makes me wonder what gems I've thrown away. :)
|
|
|
02/16/2011 02:55:48 PM · #9 |
Thats not photography! thats photoshop! |
|
|
02/16/2011 03:07:38 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by LVicari: Thats not photography! thats photoshop! |
Says the man who gave us THIS literal, unmanipulated image :-)
R.
|
|
|
02/16/2011 03:12:22 PM · #11 |
I was just waiting for a response! :)
I was trying to prod the "purists"
Just having fun, Robert.
Leo
BTW : Who says my image was manipulated? That was pretty much straight out of the camera. I think :)
Message edited by author 2011-02-16 15:19:49. |
|
|
02/16/2011 03:24:19 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by LVicari: Who says my image was manipulated? That was pretty much straight out of the camera. I think :) |
I quote your note in the Photographer's Notes box:
"Having fun with PS."
What's a bear s'posed to think? (And I'm just having fun too...)
More seriously: Although there were a lot of steps involved in making the image useful, I don't consider it to be particularly "photoshopped": the end result is reasonably close to what was shot. Seriously. I have a TON of images that are WAY more 'shopped than that :-)
R.
Message edited by author 2011-02-16 15:24:29. |
|
|
02/16/2011 03:38:32 PM · #13 |
Hey
I know. Mine was shopped pretty good. I was trying to spark a debate on PS and Photography. I personally dont care how much PS goes into an image as long as it looks good.
Leo |
|
|
02/16/2011 03:40:13 PM · #14 |
Thank you very much Robert for all the info.
I was stunned by your photo, even independently of the challenge, although it was perfection for Hitchcock.
What is ACR? (Ignorance here) I have photoshop CS4 and love it. |
|
|
02/16/2011 05:06:28 PM · #15 |
Originally posted by mariuca: What is ACR? (Ignorance here) I have photoshop CS4 and love it. |
Adobe Camera Raw: it's the RAW converter Bridge uses by default, and when you are through with it the image opens in Photoshop.
R. |
|
|
02/16/2011 05:25:30 PM · #16 |
Wow! Thank you so much for the work you put into sharing that info with the rest of us. If I recall correctly you used to be a teacher, and that is obviously part of your nature, lucky for us. |
|
|
03/15/2011 04:48:06 PM · #17 |
awesome that you posted the steps. this really makes me think one thing...
i have A LOT to learn when it comes to processing. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/05/2025 02:54:33 AM EDT.