Author | Thread |
|
12/18/2010 10:08:20 PM · #1 |
OK I have a image i would like some one who has Photoshop 5 and can try and edit out the light fitting for me. I was thinking of someone using the new "content aware" option in PS5
Now I think about it anyone that can edit it out by any means would be fine and would earn my eternal thanks.
I have considered covering the light fitting with a godzilla monster but is not quite in keeping with the rest of the image.....
Any help welcome - Thanks in advance.
Here is a link to a 5 meg jpg for your entertainment.
 |
|
|
12/18/2010 10:16:46 PM · #2 |
i cant get it to work to well.
careful cloning may be your best bet.
Message edited by author 2010-12-18 22:17:09. |
|
|
12/18/2010 10:20:47 PM · #3 |
Thanks for trying Mike ;-)
|
|
|
12/19/2010 01:56:38 AM · #4 |
I had a play, but the background is a bit too cluttered and busy for it to work well using content aware fill. It worked like a charm for the cables hanging from the ceiling, but the lamps, not so much. |
|
|
12/19/2010 03:07:06 AM · #5 |
I took a shot - not perfect and did not use content aware and played with perspective and crop...
and for the record, I would not have covered the light with Godzilla, but I would do this:
 |
|
|
12/19/2010 03:50:40 AM · #6 |
I thought about giving it a try, but decided there was too much detail in the artwork for me. (Good job, Art!) I did notice this when I was looking for a way to replace the light. Nice headless cleavage.
 |
|
|
12/19/2010 04:04:28 AM · #7 |
it's not considered avant garde if it doesn't have headless cleavage. |
|
|
12/19/2010 08:00:42 AM · #8 |
Originally posted by aliqui: Nice headless cleavage.
|
Hey - the guy taking the photo captured the bits he felt were important !
lol |
|
|
12/20/2010 12:56:54 AM · #9 |
Thank you all for your input.
This site/community is a hugely generous well meaning place.
Art i will use your edit as it fits my needs perfectly.
Not the one with Godzilla in it, but thanks for the laugh.
Cheers all
Craig
|
|
|
12/20/2010 01:01:17 AM · #10 |
Originally posted by Art Roflmao: it's not considered avant garde if it doesn't have headless cleavage. |
Sounds like a nice challenge suggestion...
|
|
|
12/20/2010 02:48:11 AM · #11 |
Originally posted by fotomann_forever: Originally posted by Art Roflmao: it's not considered avant garde if it doesn't have headless cleavage. |
Sounds like a nice challenge suggestion... |
Do you mean "Avant Garde" or "Headless Cleavage"? The latter could have legal complications. |
|
|
12/20/2010 04:00:40 AM · #12 |
Certainly if it was run as a basic editing challenge. |
|
|
12/20/2010 04:07:32 PM · #13 |
for those who asked, I put a quick explanation of the edit here:
 |
|
|
12/20/2010 04:31:50 PM · #14 |
Originally posted by aliqui: I thought about giving it a try, but decided there was too much detail in the artwork for me. (Good job, Art!) I did notice this when I was looking for a way to replace the light. Nice headless cleavage.
|
Um, where exactly were you looking for the lamp...? |
|
|
12/20/2010 05:00:51 PM · #15 |
Originally posted by tanguera: Originally posted by aliqui: I thought about giving it a try, but decided there was too much detail in the artwork for me. (Good job, Art!) I did notice this when I was looking for a way to replace the light. Nice headless cleavage.
|
Um, where exactly were you looking for the lamp...? |
I was looking for something to replace the lamp with within the artwork. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/02/2025 04:54:46 PM EDT.