Author | Thread |
|
06/27/2004 11:50:45 PM · #1 |
I used a few different layers of blurred and brightened duplicates and goofed around with their transparency until I ended up with this. It looks a more like a painting than a photograph now I think. Do you think this is taking Digital photography editing too far? Strangely enough, the only spot editing I did was to leave some regions (the flowers) less blurred than the green background.
Here's the original for comparison.
Message edited by author 2004-06-27 23:54:11. |
|
|
06/28/2004 12:23:56 AM · #2 |
Digital art or whatever, I think it's beautiful. Did you try a longer aspect like 8x10? |
|
|
06/28/2004 05:37:24 AM · #3 |
Image is a bit soft for my taste, almost bordering on "out of focus" or being blurry. Nice job with the colors though.
|
|
|
07/01/2004 01:11:13 AM · #4 |
Thanks for the suggestion pcody. I tried it and I like how it turned out.
 |
|
|
07/01/2004 10:28:19 AM · #5 |
Yes, I would consider this digital art, but I also don't think there's anything wrong with it. In fact, I really like the outcome, and I'm even more impressed with it after seeing the original. Great work :)
|
|
|
07/01/2004 10:33:09 AM · #6 |
If you apply "paint daubs" filter to this in Photoshop, you would HAVE a beautiful painting. :) I like it.
Mav
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/16/2025 10:15:49 AM EDT.