| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/16/2004 11:15:50 PM · #1 |
Too much processing? Not enough? What was I thinking? :o)
 
|
|
|
|
06/16/2004 11:44:55 PM · #2 |
I am not skilled enough to know the processing from the original. All I know is that the second one has GREAT immediacy in the top portion - excellent - but the bottom portion is far different and blown out. The bottom part doesn't seem to match with the saturation and texture of the top, if that makes sense.
|
|
|
|
06/16/2004 11:45:51 PM · #3 |
i think it is great.. i dont see any heavy post processing which is good for the purpose you intended i think,, soft focus seems to work great with the first imeage.. i think it is a good effort overall..
|
|
|
|
06/16/2004 11:57:40 PM · #4 |
I didn't have the greatest light this morning, about 30 minutes after sunrise...so I used the fill flash. That may be why the second one seems kind of washed out or something at the bottom. I'll work on that. I blurred the background on both, added some slight gaussian blur across the flowers, cloned a tad here and a tad there. I just didn't want it to look cartoonish or garish. Thanks for your help!!! :o)
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/10/2025 05:25:11 PM EDT.
