Author | Thread |
|
10/10/2004 02:16:35 AM · #1 |
I'm looking to add a Wide angle lens to my collection and would like some suggestions. I have a Canon 10D and want to buy a lens that won't break the bank but on the other hand I don't want anything cheap either. I've been looking at Sigma but I'm not that familiar with their lens. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Dale |
|
|
10/10/2004 02:26:38 AM · #2 |
tell us what breaks the bank ?
canon 17-40 F4 L is a very good glass |
|
|
10/10/2004 02:40:29 AM · #3 |
Anything over $600.00 would break my Bank!
|
|
|
10/10/2004 03:02:20 AM · #4 |
Check them out here. I have the 17-40 4.0L and it is worth the extra money. The link is a list of canon lenses and prices. Good luck.
|
|
|
10/10/2004 04:41:30 AM · #5 |
Reading the reviews Sigma has a very good reputation with lens that rival the marque lens. Of the independants they and the ATX Tokinrange are good value for money. |
|
|
10/10/2004 07:02:49 AM · #6 |
I don't think you can find too many faults with the Sigma 12-24.
It depends what sort of wide you want. If you want a regular lens that goes wide enough, then the 17-40, or the 24-70 Canons are good if you want to fork out the extra dosh. |
|
|
10/10/2004 07:02:59 AM · #7 |
Canon 17-40 f/4L hands down!
|
|
|
10/10/2004 08:14:33 AM · #8 |
I have to chime in for the 17-40 F/4 L as well. Very good sharpness and color. |
|
|
10/10/2004 12:55:29 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by Dusty: Anything over $600.00 would break my Bank! |
Canon 17-40 F/4 L is just over your budget. You can sure find some used / mint condition pieces below 600. This lens is worth the price. |
|
|
10/10/2004 01:12:43 PM · #10 |
EOS D60, just no time to enjoy it, going to cut back to something that doesn't intimidate my wife. Mint, perfect condition, all packaging included. I appear to be new here because I lost my password and my email changed, but please look at my ebay rating:
//feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?MfcISAPICommand=ViewFeedback&userid=rvgraham987
In any case, I prefer to sell face to face to someone in the Monterey Bay - San Francisco bay area.
$700, or $1400 with perfect 17-40L and 50 1.8 II
rvgraham789NOSPAM@sbcglobal.net
831-638-1767 Home 831-801-1597 cell
|
|
|
10/10/2004 02:01:43 PM · #11 |
|
|
10/10/2004 02:52:52 PM · #12 |
Dusty, I don't think you have any choice left. Just buy the 17-40 ;) |
|
|
10/10/2004 09:13:00 PM · #13 |
Thank you all for the advice! I will definately look into the 17-40L!!! Maybe I can find a used one? If I can't find one I just won't tell my wife about the extra that I'll have to fork out!! Please don't tell her! Not real sure where to look though. Again, thank you all.
Dusty
|
|
|
10/10/2004 09:26:06 PM · #14 |
I gotta recommend the Sigma 12-24.
All of these were done with the Sigma 12-24 @12mm. I looked at the 17-40 too, but it was just not wide enough.
 |
|
|
10/10/2004 09:28:12 PM · #15 |
Spaz,
Those look great :) I'm pretty 'stuck' on the 12-24 also. It has a couple disadvantages compared to the 17-40 f/4L, but its badass wide and I like that :)
|
|
|
10/12/2004 12:38:27 AM · #16 |
Spaz, those are definately fantastic photos, WOW! Now you've made my decision that much harder, LOL. Thank you!
Dusty
|
|
|
10/12/2004 01:48:47 AM · #17 |
I use a Vivitar 19-35mm, done good for me so far but I know there are much better lenses out there.
|
|
|
10/12/2004 02:43:56 AM · #18 |
Originally posted by Dusty: Spaz, those are definately fantastic photos, WOW! Now you've made my decision that much harder, LOL. Thank you!
Dusty |
Sorry to muddy your waters, but for Canon, it's the widest thing going. Unless you want a fisheye or have a 300D or 20D and can get the new 10-22. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/13/2025 12:14:45 AM EDT.