| Author | Thread | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 02:46:31 PM · #1			 | 
		
		| As often happens, this is quite ambiguous.  Does this mean complexity of the composition, or of the subject? |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 02:55:22 PM · #2			 | 
		
		that's kind of a complicated question.
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 02:56:19 PM · #3			 | 
		
		I take it too mean the subject should be complex -- but if more than one subject it could very well be the composition that makes the collective subject complex.
 
 David
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 03:41:15 PM · #4			 | 
		
		why not submitting snapshot of paper with math mambo-jumbo ? LOL.
 
 Britannica, I took a shot that made me think of how complicated (complex) some things in our lives are.
 
 Try buildings with bizarre architecture, unique constructions.. I think that anything with a lot of rods & bars could represent complexity :-)
 
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 03:43:06 PM · #5			 | 
		
		Originally posted by nshapiro:   As often happens, this is quite ambiguous.  Does this mean complexity of the composition, or of the subject?  |   
 
 Perhaps there is no 'right' approach? Perhaps both are acceptable?
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 03:47:01 PM · #6			 | 
		
		| I choose a complex issue as opposed to a literal interpretation.  I am already thinking that I will recieve either a very good score or a very low score with everyone commenting that it doesn't meet the challenge.  I may change my submission yet. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 03:52:43 PM · #7			 | 
		
		Originally posted by e301:   Originally posted by nshapiro:   As often happens, this is quite ambiguous.  Does this mean complexity of the composition, or of the subject?  |   
 
 Perhaps there is no 'right' approach? Perhaps both are acceptable?  |   
 
 Sure, then half the voters give you a 1, and the other half score you according to your photo. ;) |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 04:02:30 PM · #8			 | 
		
		could the rubix cube not be simplicity or complexity???  considering math is fairly easy why not consider other objects???
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 04:07:22 PM · #9			 | 
		
		In the end, the most complex subject would be women, but those feminists with their ego trips will rate those photos poorly for sure..
 
 Said in a humoristic spirit, no offence please :o)
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 04:08:06 PM · #10			 | 
		
		Originally posted by notonline:   could the rubix cube not be simplicity or complexity???  considering math is fairly easy why not consider other objects???  |   
 
 i thought of a rubix cube too, as did my girlfriend when i asked her if she had any ideas. lets see if any rubix cubes show up in this challenge.
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 04:08:35 PM · #11			 | 
		
		Originally posted by s4nd3r99:   In the end, the most complex subject would be women, but those feminists with their ego trips will rate those photos poorly for sure..
 
 Said in a humoristic spirit, no offence please :o)  |   
 
 hahah i mentioned that in the chat room before.
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 04:12:38 PM · #12			 | 
		
		| I _almost_ submitted a picture of my girlfriend, but opted for my current submission instead. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 04:13:16 PM · #13			 | 
		
		Originally posted by xtabintun:   I _almost_ submitted a picture of my girlfriend, but opted for my current submission instead.  |   
 
 That's funny stuff! |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 04:13:59 PM · #14			 | 
		
		i was going to use the rubix cube also.  I think we will see a couple in the challenge.
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 04:14:25 PM · #15			 | 
		
		| I was going to do a rubix cube woman supported by rods, with a math eqation backround, but couldn't get the depth of feild and lighting. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 04:30:07 PM · #16			 | 
		
		Originally posted by Cafe O Penguins:   I was going to do a rubix cube woman supported by rods, with a math eqation backround, but couldn't get the depth of feild and lighting.  |   
 
 I would LOVE to see that shot! |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 04:46:43 PM · #17			 | 
		
		I̢۪m trying not to go for the literal meaning which will probable result in either plenty of 2, 3 and 4 or 7, 8, 9. It̢۪s very hard to judge peoples reaction.
 
 I have seen some wonderful photos that meet the challenge dead on and they still have scores of 1, 2 and 3's.
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 08:17:24 PM · #18			 | 
		
		I'm extremely pleased that this challenge has a description that is wonderfully vague, allowing me to take a photo that captures the essence of complexity (whether through composition, subject, technique...whatever).
 
 It also allows me to vote very simply:  "Is this a photo that does a great job of capturing 'complexity'?"
 
 I wish all the challenge descriptions where this open!  Big smile on my face... |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 08:18:59 PM · #19			 | 
		
		Just take a photo of a woman.
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/25/2004 08:21:17 PM · #20			 | 
		
		Originally posted by Jacko:   Just take a photo of a woman.  |   
 
 Nekkid is preferable.
 
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/26/2004 01:36:43 AM · #21			 | 
		
		Originally posted by Riggs:   Originally posted by Jacko:   Just take a photo of a woman.  |   
 
 Nekkid is preferable.  |   
 Not that I'm against it -- but that kind of simplifies the impact of the image; doesn't it?  :D
 
 ---
 
 When I read the subject I immediately thought of the science of complexity; basically, many simple things interacting to form complex patterns, such as the flocking of birds/schooling of fish or the formation of clouds.  The trick, I think, is not in finding something complex to shoot, but in finding a shot that shows the complexity in an easily identifiable way -- all while being compositionally sound.
 
 David
 
 /edit: added link
  Message edited by author 2004-09-26 01:43:14.
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/27/2004 07:58:54 AM · #22			 | 
		
		I checked out the thumbnails for the complexity challenge, and I have to say I'm pleased with what I see so far...this will be a great challenge to vote on!  It looks like there are a lot of interesting interpretations...
 
 I'm sitting at about 5.3 with no comments so far, but I personally wouldn't rate my photo much higher than that anyhow so I'm happy... |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/27/2004 08:23:58 AM · #23			 | 
		
		I'm going for my lowest score yet!
 
 there's still wacky foods though... |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/27/2004 08:28:26 AM · #24			 | 
		
		i am sitting at just over 6.  whoo hoo.
 however my touch challenge is in the 4 range.. so it makes up for it.
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/27/2004 08:43:01 AM · #25			 | 
		
		Could be my 3rd highest score. Sitting at 6.1220 right now.
  Message edited by author 2004-09-27 08:43:13. |  
  | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 11/03/2025 09:09:06 PM EST.