| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/24/2004 12:30:22 AM · #1 |
Thoughts?
Or any other contenders? |
|
|
|
06/24/2004 12:39:41 AM · #2 |
I think the Epson inks are supposed to last longer but otherwise they are probably both strong choices. I read the other day that Kodak was selling inkjet photo paper that enjoyed 100yr+ longevity. Is that true? But might be worth looking into if you are concerned about that issue but like the Canon printer better.
Just my 2cents :-) |
|
|
|
06/24/2004 12:43:50 AM · #3 |
The canon has 2 picolotre drop sizes, and the Epson has 1.5 pL drops.
Does this make a lick of differences? |
|
|
|
06/24/2004 12:45:56 AM · #4 |
I have no experience with the Canon printer. The R800 is great - fast, beautiful prints, quiet, takes a variety of papers (matte, lustre, glossy). Each of the inks can be replaced on their own, rather than in a cartridge with all the others (less wastage)
Archival up to 100 or 200 years or something similar, under the right conditions, and it'll also print CD labels which I've used a few times and is quite cool.
|
|
|
|
06/24/2004 12:54:14 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by Gordon:
Each of the inks can be replaced on their own, rather than in a cartridge with all the others (less wastage) |
The Canon does have the individual tanks, but print heads?
is it better that a print head is attached to the printer, or a removeable cradle?? I'm thinking it is the cradle option. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/12/2025 01:34:02 AM EDT.
