DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Individual Photograph Discussion >> worthy or not?
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 11 of 11, (reverse)
AuthorThread
06/14/2004 09:30:24 PM · #1
Would that,



be print worthy even with that kind of noise in background?

(actual 100% crop of a print sized 300DPI file)

Nothing work in Neatimage, I can both leave it that way or dump it!

Thanks in advance for advice


06/14/2004 10:26:14 PM · #2
Nobody?
06/14/2004 10:28:06 PM · #3
On my monitor, I have difficulty seeing the noise you are talking about. I think the shot is lovely. As a print, it will probably print just fine if it's not blown up extremely large. Then again, I'm not a professional, so what do I know. ;o)
06/14/2004 10:53:42 PM · #4
Originally posted by laurielblack:

On my monitor, I have difficulty seeing the noise you are talking about. I think the shot is lovely. As a print, it will probably print just fine if it's not blown up extremely large. Then again, I'm not a professional, so what do I know. ;o)


Thanks laurie, I noticed that you often replies to questions posted by others (more often than I do sadly).
It made me ask my self who you where so I looked at your profile. I really like Jazz but my best of from you is "Hot metal, cold pink" wich was added to my favorites along with your profile. Thanks for being a prolific and usefull commenter.
06/15/2004 01:04:44 AM · #5
Oooh, oooh, ouch. Lovely shot, very crisp, nice light, but looking at the close up, the pixelization really hurts. I'd try for a reshoot. Maybe while you're at it, try a less central composition using the rule of thirds, and improve it in more than one way?
06/15/2004 01:21:53 AM · #6
You might try this technique for reducing the color in the grain.

Create a duplicate layer in PS, apply Gaussian Blur, get it pretty blurry (you may have to experiment with the radius but try 4 or 5 to start), set the blend mode to color, then adjust the opacity until the effect is strong enough without creating halos.
06/15/2004 02:41:57 PM · #7
Originally posted by jodiecoston:

Oooh, oooh, ouch. Lovely shot, very crisp, nice light, but looking at the close up, the pixelization really hurts. I'd try for a reshoot. Maybe while you're at it, try a less central composition using the rule of thirds, and improve it in more than one way?


Thanks for the advice. I may reshoot it but not before i'm sure I did all i could with that one. By the way, Calla lilly is truly amazing. Congratulation!!
06/15/2004 02:47:34 PM · #8
Originally posted by Spazmo99:

You might try this technique for reducing the color in the grain.

Create a duplicate layer in PS, apply Gaussian Blur, get it pretty blurry (you may have to experiment with the radius but try 4 or 5 to start), set the blend mode to color, then adjust the opacity until the effect is strong enough without creating halos.


Really thanks for the trick. I'm gonna keep it in my mind with other problematic images. Now the noise in my photo look much like film grain wich for me is really great. By the way, "The far three" just made it to my favorites. It's really... ... ... lacking for a stronger word because english is not my home language i'd say... amazing how the composition in this shot is hot. I think it's really fun to use the forum requesting for answer and giving comment back to people who care to answer you. Thanks again.
06/15/2004 03:02:15 PM · #9
Nicolas, I think its a great shot, i've been shooting flowers for a couple of weeks now (1.4gb to be exact!).

Its a 'good' shot but looking at your portfolio I wouldn't rank it amongst your best (that is certainly a compliment). I have been struggling with getting a flower pick good enough to print and decided to try black bacgkgrounds to remove any 'clutter'

I think the below is a great Rose and may submit it as a print myself (well I'll buy it)


btw, you need to change the links in your signature, they point to the viewers portfolio/prints (I thought you'd been copying me :)
06/15/2004 06:39:21 PM · #10
[quote=Ecce Signum] Nicolas, I think its a great shot, i've been shooting flowers for a couple of weeks now (1.4gb to be exact!).

Its a 'good' shot but looking at your portfolio I wouldn't rank it amongst your best (that is certainly a compliment). I have been struggling with getting a flower pick good enough to print and decided to try black bacgkgrounds to remove any 'clutter'

Hi Andy. Thanks for the compliment. 1st of all, I'm jealous of where you live. I love Norfolk and Virginia Beach very much. I have myself a collection of photography from this area and particularly the norfolk harbor and the naval base that I've taken from a cruise last summer... before I knew how to take good pictures :-( I don't want black background in my flower pictures because for me a good point is to have a nature context around a flower and the look of the sun in the picture. Wich I had not in my original beacause I took the photography around 8:30 P.M. I've been correcting and corecting to get the "look" of a sunny day in my picture (wich I almost got) and the result is I have to deal with a lot of noise from the editing. I've been suggested to reshoot but since yesterday the flower became ugly...

Speaking of photography, you have a photography in your portfolio that have a powerfull potential and it's retired after 50 years. I leave a comment on it now.

Thanks again!!

06/15/2004 07:18:21 PM · #11
Thanks Nicolas, first off I live in Norfolk England, a very fine place :) as for reshooting pictures of flowers it is hard and you realy need to get it right first time, I had 2 days with the rose below but am still unhappy, sadly too late to reshoot

And thanks for the comments on my recent challenge entry (I do like the sepia idea), I really need to reshoot this and as its at the bottom of my garden I have no excuse!


Pages:  
Current Server Time: 09/10/2025 06:28:45 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/10/2025 06:28:45 PM EDT.