Author | Thread |
|
06/02/2004 04:49:01 PM · #1 |
Well, I reckon this would have done well (taken on the 31st June though)
And this
]
would have been my June submission if
1. it wasn't taken so early in the month and
2. I hadn't posted it here
I reckon I've come on in leaps and bounds this last couple of months (thanks for all your guidance) and If I can better either of these pics i'll be more than happy
Would love some constructive critism, am in a good mood tonight so you won't upset me 
|
|
|
06/02/2004 05:29:32 PM · #2 |
The bird looks awesome, (Shame you can't enter it)
And the flower is pretty good to.what lens did you use?
looks a bit close for the kit lens |
|
|
06/02/2004 06:19:20 PM · #3 |
Thanks Shane, I suprised myself with the baby falcon pic but its a crop so probably not go bigger than 7x5, the rose is about 75% of the original and am happy with it, am close to submitting my first print to dpc :)
Both pics were taken with my new 75-300 USM IS. I'll be amongst the first to say its not the cam, moreover the photog that makes a good pic but I must say I reckon I'm getting better pics since I got the 300D (or maybe I've learnt more from you folks?)
|
|
|
06/02/2004 06:24:14 PM · #4 |
Are you copying me ?
:-) |
|
|
06/02/2004 06:34:21 PM · #5 |
I.m part way through saving for that lens now should have it by xmas
with a bit of luck, bought the cheap sigma 70-300 to tide me over, its ok but not that quality.
How do you find the push pull zooming? |
|
|
06/02/2004 06:36:56 PM · #6 |
lol I wish :)
If I ever get a 6.xxx I wouldn't care if I was Not being biased (in any way) but I prefer my shot, not sure about your border but don't they say plaguerisn is the best form of flattery?
|
|
|
06/02/2004 06:37:22 PM · #7 |
Thats pretty awesome to pitsaman. is it a falcon as well? |
|
|
06/02/2004 06:41:08 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by Andelain: I.m part way through saving for that lens now should have it by xmas
with a bit of luck, bought the cheap sigma 70-300 to tide me over, its ok but not that quality.
How do you find the push pull zooming? |
Shane, the 75-300 isn't push pull. I've just posted the Sigma 70-300 APO back to the guy I bought it off as it needs re-chipping and only worked on the 300D @ 300, nice lense though.
|
|
|
06/02/2004 06:44:29 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by pitsaman: Are you copying me ?
:-) |
just checked and I have seen this, scored it a 7 :)
edited to say, nope I'm not copying, this is a way better shot :)
Message edited by author 2004-06-02 18:45:37.
|
|
|
06/02/2004 06:45:06 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by Ecce Signum: Well, I reckon this would have done well (taken on the 31st June though) |
If your EXIF says that's taken on June 31st I suggest you upgrade the camera firmware to use the Gregorian Calendar. |
|
|
06/02/2004 06:48:56 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by GeneralE: Originally posted by Ecce Signum: Well, I reckon this would have done well (taken on the 31st June though) |
If your EXIF says that's taken on June 31st I suggest you upgrade the camera firmware to use the Gregorian Calendar. |
LOL, oh, look at this, EXIF says 01.01.2001, maybe I should enter it and plead insanity????
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/06/2025 02:09:45 PM EDT.