Author | Thread |
|
02/07/2013 02:13:12 PM · #1 |
Description: Give us your best shot where you convey the idea of "One becomes Two".
Editing: Advanced. |
|
|
07/28/2014 01:21:54 PM · #2 |
Ok, so ... Anyone have any thoughts as to what this should be? |
|
|
07/28/2014 01:25:29 PM · #3 |
Cutting a worm in half??? |
|
|
07/28/2014 01:27:56 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by Cory: Anyone have any thoughts as to what this should be? |
I had one, but then it became two. |
|
|
07/28/2014 01:29:06 PM · #5 |
This is a complicated one. I have an idea, but I'm starting to think many people willl think of the same... hmm. |
|
|
07/28/2014 01:29:43 PM · #6 |
If you have them, I imagine you could photograph your divorce papers.
Or, Langdon could have titled it "Sliced Fruit" |
|
|
07/28/2014 02:36:11 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by LN13: If you have them, I imagine you could photograph your divorce papers.
Or, Langdon could have titled it "Sliced Fruit" |
stole my idea... |
|
|
07/28/2014 03:40:26 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by wiki: Axiom of Maria is a precept in alchemy: "One becomes two, two becomes three, and out of the third comes the one as the fourth." It is attributed to 3rd century alchemist Maria Prophetissa, also called the Jewess, sister of Moses, or the Copt.[1] Marie-Louise von Franz gives an alternative version thus: "Out of the One comes Two, out of Two comes Three, and from the Third comes the One as the Fourth."[2]
Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung (1875 – 1961) used the axiom as a metaphor for the process of individuation. One is unconscious wholeness; two is the conflict of opposites; three points to a potential resolution; the third is the transcendent function, described as a "psychic function that arises from the tension between consciousness and the unconscious and supports their union";[3] and the one as the fourth is a transformed state of consciousness, relatively whole and at peace.
Jung speaks of the axiom of Maria as running in various forms through the whole of alchemy like a leitmotiv. In "The Psychology of the Transference" he writes of the fourfold nature of the transforming process using the language of Greek alchemy:
"It begins with the four separate elements, the state of chaos, and ascends by degrees to the three manifestations of Mercurius[4] in the inorganic, organic, and spiritual worlds; and, after attaining the form of Sol and Luna (i.e., the precious metal gold and silver, but also the radiance of the gods who can overcome the strife of the elements by love), it culminates in the one and indivisible (incorruptible, ethereal, eternal) nature of the anima, the quinta essentia, aqua permanens, tincture, or lapis philosophorum. This progression from the number 4 to 3 to 2 to 1 is the 'axiom of Maria'..."[5]
The Axiom of Maria may be interpreted as an alchemical analogy of the process of individuation from the many to the one, from undifferentiated unconsciousness to individual consciousness. |
Lyrics of "One Becomes Two" By Kaura:
Trying to find my way out
Feeling like I̢۪ve been drowned in doubt
Strangled by my own vice
Nothing comes without sacrificeâ€Â¦I’ve triedâ€Â¦I’ve tried
I̢۪ve tried all my life to be someone, to find my place
I̢۪ve tried all this time to be something
But I still feel the same
Struggling with the unknown
But how can I see when that̢۪s all I̢۪m shown
One becomes two and then three
Time is slipping away from me
All I know is I can̢۪t breather because it hurts too much
I̢۪ve tried all my life to be someone, to find my place
I̢۪ve tried all this time to be something
But I still feel the sameâ€Â¦I’ve triedâ€Â¦I’ve tried |
|
|
07/28/2014 05:56:32 PM · #9 |
Just have to find someone in town who is giving birth the same time as the challenge...and is willing to let me photograph it...with 'artistic vision'.
Should be simple ;-)
"Hey doc, your hands are in my shot, can you move over?" |
|
|
07/28/2014 06:18:50 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by rcollier: "Hey doc, your hands are in my shot, can you move over?" |
I think that might elicit a "Five becomes One" response ... :-)  |
|
|
07/29/2014 01:31:18 AM · #11 |
I have thought deeply on this matter â€Â¦ and am reduced to a crisis of conscience. My sleep is troubled with dreams of madness. I seek chemical comfort but it is denied me.
Whether it is nobler to cut Art Roflmao in half or choose a noble flatworm to sever? Whether to serve up two halves of a frame? To show a half measure of some vibrant liquid, or two, against a benign background? Cut off a digit? Sever an heirloom tomato. Slice a personality into a Jeckle/Hide montage (using Advanced editing only , please).
I am sorry to report the discomfit I experience. Perhaps brilliance will emerge from the collective's creativity! |
|
|
07/29/2014 09:22:16 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by Dr.Confuser: I have thought deeply on this matter â€Â¦ and am reduced to a crisis of conscience. My sleep is troubled with dreams of madness. I seek chemical comfort but it is denied me.
Whether it is nobler to cut Art Roflmao in half or choose a noble flatworm to sever? Whether to serve up two halves of a frame? To show a half measure of some vibrant liquid, or two, against a benign background? Cut off a digit? Sever an heirloom tomato. Slice a personality into a Jeckle/Hide montage (using Advanced editing only , please).
I am sorry to report the discomfit I experience. Perhaps brilliance will emerge from the collective's creativity! |
I'm glad to report the remedy to all your woes is here.
:) |
|
|
07/29/2014 11:36:31 AM · #13 |
A picture of identical twins should fit the challenge
|
|
|
07/29/2014 03:03:47 PM · #14 |
All right, now we're cloning Art Roflmao. Sounds fun! |
|
|
07/29/2014 03:05:07 PM · #15 |
10% of all the drinking challenge entries.... |
|
|
07/30/2014 05:32:59 PM · #16 |
a = b
a^2=ab
a^2 - b^2 = ab - b^2
(a-b)(a+b)=b(a-b)
a + b = b
2b = b
2 = 1 |
|
|
07/30/2014 05:58:39 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by vawendy: a = b
a^2=ab
a^2 - b^2 = ab - b^2
(a-b)(a+b)=b(a-b)
a + b = b
2b = b
2 = 1 |
Hmmm...
to get from (a-b)(a+b)=b(a-b) to a + b = b you have to divide both sides by (a-b) but a-b=0 and you cannot divide by zero?
|
|
|
07/30/2014 06:22:05 PM · #18 |
Originally posted by markwiley: Originally posted by vawendy: a = b
a^2=ab
a^2 - b^2 = ab - b^2
(a-b)(a+b)=b(a-b)
a + b = b
2b = b
2 = 1 |
Hmmm...
to get from (a-b)(a+b)=b(a-b) to a + b = b you have to divide both sides by (a-b) but a-b=0 and you cannot divide by zero? |
ok -- how about this then
a = b
a^2=ab
a^2 - b^2 = ab - b^2
(a+b)(a-b)=b(a-b)
(a+b)(a-b)!=b(a-b)!
a + b = b
2b = b
2 = 1
since 0 factorial = 1 :) |
|
|
07/30/2014 09:41:29 PM · #19 |
I followed you up to here: (a+b)(a-b)=b(a-b). I am not quite sure how you go from there to (a+b)(a-b)!=b(a-b)! but my math skills are rusty.
I think we may have killed this thread. |
|
|
07/30/2014 09:48:24 PM · #20 |
Originally posted by markwiley: I followed you up to here: (a+b)(a-b)=b(a-b). I am not quite sure how you go from there to (a+b)(a-b)!=b(a-b)! but my math skills are rusty.
I think we may have killed this thread. |
You can't, that is invalid algebra. You cannot choose to apply something to PART of each side of the equation, you need to apply to ALL of each side of the equation. |
|
|
07/30/2014 10:43:41 PM · #21 |
Originally posted by Professor Tom Lehrer:
New Math (from "That Was The Year That Was" recorded live in 1965)
Some of you who have small children may have perhaps been put in the embarrassing
position of being unable to do your child's arithmetic homework because of the
current revolution in mathematics teaching known as the New Math. So as a public
service here tonight, I thought I would offer a brief lesson in the New Math.
Tonight, we're gonna cover subtraction. This is the first room I've worked for a
while that didn't have a blackboard, so we will have to make do with more primitive
visual aids, as they say in the ed biz. Consider the following subtraction problem,
which I will put up here: 342 minus 173. Now, remember how we used to do that:
Three from two is nine, carry the one, and if you're under 35 or went to a private
school, you say seven from three is six, but if you're over 35 and went to a public
school, you say eight from four is six ...and carry the one, so we have 169.
But in the new approach, as you know, the important thing is to understand what
you're doing, rather than to get the right answer. Here's how they do it now:
You can't take three from two,
Two is less than three,
So you look at the four in the tens place.
Now that's really four tens
So you make it three tens,
Regroup, and you change a ten to ten ones,
And you add 'em to the two and get twelve,
And you take away three, that's nine.
Is that clear?
Now instead of four in the tens place
You've got three,
'Cause you added one,
That is to say, ten, to the two,
But you can't take seven from three,
So you look in the hundreds place.
From the three you then use one
To make ten ones...
(And you know why four plus minus one
Plus ten is fourteen minus one?
'Cause addition is commutative, right!)...
And so you've got thirteen tens
And you take away seven,
And that leaves five...
Well, six actually...
But the idea is the important thing!
Now go back to the hundreds place,
You're left with two,
And you take away one from two,
And that leaves...?
Everybody get one?
Not bad for the first day!
Hooray for New Math,
New-hoo-hoo Math,
It won't do you a bit of good to review math.
It's so simple,
So very simple,
That only a child can do it!
Now, that actually is not the answer that I had in mind, because the book that I got
this problem out of wants you to do it in base eight. But don't panic! Base eight is
just like base ten really - if you're missing two fingers! Shall we have a go at it?
Hang on...
You can't take three from two,
Two is less than three,
So you look at the four in the eights place.
Now that's really four eights,
So you make it three eights,
Regroup, and you change an eight to eight ones
And you add 'em to the two,
And you get one-two base eight,
Which is ten base ten,
And you take away three, that's seven.
Ok?
Now instead of four in the eights place
You've got three,
'Cause you added one,
That is to say, eight, to the two,
But you can't take seven from three,
So you look at the sixty-fours...
"Sixty-four? How did sixty-four get into it?" I hear you cry! Well, sixty-four
is eight squared, don't you see? "Well, ya ask a silly question, ya get a silly answer!"
From the three, you then use one
To make eight ones,
You add those ones to the three,
And you get one-three base eight,
Or, in other words,
In base ten you have eleven,
And you take away seven,
And seven from eleven is four!
Now go back to the sixty-fours,
You're left with two,
And you take away one from two,
And that leaves...?
Now, let's not always see the same hands!
One, that's right.
Whoever got one can stay after the show and clean the erasers.
Hooray for New Math,
New-hoo-hoo Math!
It won't do you a bit of good to review math.
It's so simple,
So very simple,
That only a child can do it!
Come back tomorrow night...we're gonna do fractions!
Y'know, I've often thought I'd like to write a mathematics textbook someday because I have a title that I know will sell a million copies; I'm gonna call it Tropic of Calculus |
Message edited by author 2014-07-30 22:46:11. |
|
|
07/30/2014 11:18:53 PM · #22 |
and they said we would never use algebra outside of high school lololol
Message edited by author 2014-07-30 23:19:28. |
|
|
07/31/2014 02:18:46 AM · #23 |
Everyone talking math go and wash your mouths out!
|
|
|
07/31/2014 09:17:54 AM · #24 |
Originally posted by jomari: Everyone talking math go and wash your mouths out! |
LOL ! |
|
|
08/10/2014 12:49:29 PM · #25 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/23/2025 03:21:07 PM EDT.